Mostly bizarre.

[Foxaèr]

As far as it concern me I pick what make sense and I leave the rest to fools that dream that the universe pop up as per magic.  

Have a good day anyway.  

That's precisely my point. You're choosing to believe in that which subjectively makes sense to you rather than what objectively makes sense realistically.

[Anomalocaris]

Well, why now you're just mixing science fiction with theology, because that simply makes everything much clearer.

I would rather leave theology with CL and science fiction with atheists.
As far as it concern me I pick what make sense and I leave the rest to fools that dream that the universe pop up as per magic.  

Have a good day anyway.  

Well, you see, you are an ignorant wishthinking idiot. So only idiotic ignorant bullshit appear to make sense to you.

[BrianSoddingBoru4]

Clearly, you missed (or - what is more likely - ignored) this bit:

'Thousands of experiments confirm the hypothesis that neurochemical processes produce subjective experiences.'

An experiment which confirms an hypothesis qualifies as evidence.  What there is NO evidence for is the loopy idea that consciousness proceeds (or persists, if you like) without neurochemical processes.  Neurochemical processes have never, ever, not once, been observed to occur in a dead brain.

You're an idiot.

Boru

FOOL.  

Why there should be neurochemical processes once the consciousness has left the brain?
Do you expect a wreck of a vehicle with no driver to show any activity?

Once again you show that you know nothing about the relation between consciousness and brain-body.

Go back to school boy.  

You asked the wrong questions.

Why there should be neurochemical processes once the consciousness has left the brain?

The proper question should be, 'How can there be consciousness outside of a neurochemically active brain, when such has never been shown to be the case?'

Do you expect a wreck of a vehicle with no driver to show any activity?

The proper question should be, 'How can a vehicle continue operate after the driver has died?'

Boru

[Angrboda]

[Little Rik]

Humm..........I have been banned few times for less than that but of course you will not be banned.  

Why such a smart girl should be banned?  

Have a good day anyway.  

[Peebothuhlu]

At work.

Hello!

I'm new to the forum but, sadly, late to the/this thread.

Might the OP indulge my tardy self with a short summation of their veiws/points?

Cheers!

[Little Rik]

FOOL.  

Why there should be neurochemical processes once the consciousness has left the brain?
Do you expect a wreck of a vehicle with no driver to show any activity?

Once again you show that you know nothing about the relation between consciousness and brain-body.

Go back to school boy.  

You asked the wrong questions.

Why there should be neurochemical processes once the consciousness has left the brain?

The proper question should be, 'How can there be consciousness outside of a neurochemically active brain, when such has never been shown to be the case?'

Do you expect a wreck of a vehicle with no driver to show any activity?

The proper question should be, 'How can a vehicle continue operate after the driver has died?'

Boru

My reply to your previous post may seem to you as questions.
Unfortunately you lack   what is needed to understand the meaning of my answers or you may pretend that my answer to you are questions when in reality are just answers to your previous questions.
In all cases you fail and fail badly.  

---

At work.

Hello!

I'm new to the forum but, sadly, late to the/this thread.

Might the OP indulge my tardy self with a short summation of their veiws/points?

Cheers!

Welcome to the forum PT.      

Is all very very simple.
Here there is a group of people that dream that science back them.
Unfortunately for them science contradict them at every step so they get angry and use a despicable way to address me.
Nothing new really.  

[Peebothuhlu]

At work.

Uhm...... I'm sorry I don't quite parse that reply.

Could you, perhaps, offer an example or an instance?

Cheers.

[chimp3]

Lil Rik believes if a 9 year old child is raped and murdered it is because of some crime commited in a previous life. The ultimate victim blaming!

[The Grand Nudger]

He's our favorite dog-based crank....and a living example to the failed low energy trolls of the world!