Posts: 6851
Threads: 76
Joined: October 17, 2012
Reputation:
31
Hawkings: Khan is real!
October 15, 2018 at 6:25 am
(This post was last modified: October 15, 2018 at 6:25 am by John V.)
https://www.sciencealert.com/stephen-haw...-ai-planet
Quote:"I am sure that during this century people will discover how to modify both intelligence and instincts such as aggression," he writes.
"Laws will probably be passed against genetic engineering with humans. But some people won't be able to resist the temptation to improve human characteristics, such as size of memory, resistance to disease, and length of life."
The elites who receive this kind of genetic augmentation – which Hawking dubs "superhumans" – may emerge onto a collision course with natural humans, the professor suggests, and the contest could be one that comes to define the very future custodianship of the planet.
"Once such superhumans appear, there are going to be significant political problems with the unimproved humans, who won't be able to compete," he suggests.
Sorry Steve, but Star Trek beat you to it:
Posts: 7392
Threads: 53
Joined: January 15, 2015
Reputation:
88
RE: Hawkings: Khan is real!
October 15, 2018 at 6:54 am
(This post was last modified: October 15, 2018 at 6:55 am by I_am_not_mafia.)
Hawkings was an astro-physicist. But because of all the admiration he garnered for his work it seems to have gone to his head. I know he talked utter shite about Artificial Intelligence. I'm not going to bother listening to him about genetic engineering.
In my last job I spent 6 months processing genetic data looking for patterns. I was being shown the ropes in Bioinformatics. But even then I wouldn't feel comfortable making such predictions. Or possibly because I now have an idea of the complexity involved.
Posts: 30726
Threads: 2123
Joined: May 24, 2012
Reputation:
71
RE: Hawkings: Khan is real!
October 15, 2018 at 7:34 am
Not this shit again.
Star Trek didn't invent shit. It was a FUCKING TV SHOW, not a lab.
Posts: 46161
Threads: 539
Joined: July 24, 2013
Reputation:
109
RE: Hawkings: Khan is real!
October 15, 2018 at 8:30 am
(This post was last modified: October 15, 2018 at 8:31 am by BrianSoddingBoru4.)
(October 15, 2018 at 6:25 am)alpha male Wrote: https://www.sciencealert.com/stephen-haw...-ai-planet
Quote:"I am sure that during this century people will discover how to modify both intelligence and instincts such as aggression," he writes.
"Laws will probably be passed against genetic engineering with humans. But some people won't be able to resist the temptation to improve human characteristics, such as size of memory, resistance to disease, and length of life."
The elites who receive this kind of genetic augmentation – which Hawking dubs "superhumans" – may emerge onto a collision course with natural humans, the professor suggests, and the contest could be one that comes to define the very future custodianship of the planet.
"Once such superhumans appear, there are going to be significant political problems with the unimproved humans, who won't be able to compete," he suggests.
Sorry Steve, but Star Trek beat you to it:
Did Hawking also predict Shatner's mastery of the art of overacting?
Boru
‘I can’t be having with this.’ - Esmeralda Weatherwax
Posts: 17007
Threads: 461
Joined: March 29, 2015
Reputation:
30
RE: Hawkings: Khan is real!
October 15, 2018 at 4:56 pm
(This post was last modified: October 15, 2018 at 4:57 pm by Fake Messiah.)
You get it guys! Because Hawking (but in this topic he is re-named Hawkings because after all beta fail is dumb as shit) said something that is obviously from Star Trek he was being silly and if Hawking was silly (read: wrong) then he must have been silly about everything including universe that is billions of years old and evolution of life, thus fairy tale stories that beta fail takes for granted must be right!
teachings of the Bible are so muddled and self-contradictory that it was possible for Christians to happily burn heretics alive for five long centuries. It was even possible for the most venerated patriarchs of the Church, like St. Augustine and St. Thomas Aquinas, to conclude that heretics should be tortured (Augustine) or killed outright (Aquinas). Martin Luther and John Calvin advocated the wholesale murder of heretics, apostates, Jews, and witches. - Sam Harris, "Letter To A Christian Nation"
Posts: 549
Threads: 3
Joined: May 28, 2017
Reputation:
42
RE: Hawkings: Khan is real!
October 15, 2018 at 5:12 pm
(October 15, 2018 at 7:34 am)Brian37 Wrote: Not this shit again.
Star Trek didn't invent shit. It was a FUCKING TV SHOW, not a lab.
But it did inspire shit.
Shit we have today exists because inventors credited getting the ideas from Star Trek.
Posts: 46161
Threads: 539
Joined: July 24, 2013
Reputation:
109
RE: Hawkings: Khan is real!
October 15, 2018 at 5:32 pm
(This post was last modified: October 15, 2018 at 5:33 pm by BrianSoddingBoru4.)
(October 15, 2018 at 5:12 pm)Aliza Wrote: (October 15, 2018 at 7:34 am)Brian37 Wrote: Not this shit again.
Star Trek didn't invent shit. It was a FUCKING TV SHOW, not a lab.
But it did inspire shit.
Shit we have today exists because inventors credited getting the ideas from Star Trek.
Too right. Cell phones, tablet computers, automatic pocket doors, 3D printing, remote medical sensing, etc.
This isn't to say that these things never would have come about without ST, but the inspiration factor is not rationally deniable.
Boru
‘I can’t be having with this.’ - Esmeralda Weatherwax
Posts: 11697
Threads: 117
Joined: November 5, 2016
Reputation:
43
RE: Hawkings: Khan is real!
October 15, 2018 at 5:35 pm
(October 15, 2018 at 4:56 pm)Fake Messiah Wrote: You get it guys! Because Hawking (but in this topic he is re-named Hawkings because after all beta fail is dumb as shit) said something that is obviously from Star Trek he was being silly and if Hawking was silly (read: wrong) then he must have been silly about everything including universe that is billions of years old and evolution of life, thus fairy tale stories that beta fail takes for granted must be right! Beta Fail apparently has confused scientists for his make believe prophet cultists
Seek strength, not to be greater than my brother, but to fight my greatest enemy -- myself.
Inuit Proverb
Posts: 19789
Threads: 57
Joined: September 24, 2010
Reputation:
85
RE: Hawkings: Khan is real!
October 15, 2018 at 5:39 pm
(This post was last modified: October 15, 2018 at 5:41 pm by Anomalocaris.)
(October 15, 2018 at 6:54 am)Mathilda Wrote: Hawkings was an astro-physicist. But because of all the admiration he garnered for his work it seems to have gone to his head. I know he talked utter shite about Artificial Intelligence. I'm not going to bother listening to him about genetic engineering.
In my last job I spent 6 months processing genetic data looking for patterns. I was being shown the ropes in Bioinformatics. But even then I wouldn't feel comfortable making such predictions. Or possibly because I now have an idea of the complexity involved.
Complexity may be a major hurdle to achieving safe, consistent, predicatable results. It may also be a major hurdle to making the process affordable and accessible.
It is not necessarily a nearly as serious a hurdle to achieving some significant but opportunistic results by those who are willing to gamble their own or other people’s health and safety in a processed too expensive to apply to but a few.
I think Hawkin is right. It is th second category we should fear.
Posts: 6851
Threads: 76
Joined: October 17, 2012
Reputation:
31
RE: Hawkings: Khan is real!
October 15, 2018 at 7:14 pm
(October 15, 2018 at 4:56 pm)Fake Messiah Wrote: You get it guys! Because Hawking (but in this topic he is re-named Hawkings because after all beta fail is dumb as shit) said something that is obviously from Star Trek he was being silly and if Hawking was silly (read: wrong) then he must have been silly about everything including universe that is billions of years old and evolution of life, thus fairy tale stories that beta fail takes for granted must be right!
LMAO - dude, I'm just joking around. Want me to send you a quarter so you can buy a sense of humor?
|