Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: March 28, 2024, 9:10 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
I believe there is no God.
#11
RE: I believe there is no God.
You "believe there is no god"

A belief that there is no god is a positive position. It is also position of gnosticism, the Agnostic version would be a belief that there is probably no god.

What is your justification for this belief?

Is the justification sound and valid? (the premises are true and the conclusion follows).

You seem like you're committing the black swan fallacy.
.
Reply
#12
RE: I believe there is no God.
The term god needs to be defined with greater specificity before there is potential for any logical fallacy.
Reply
#13
RE: I believe there is no God.
Aerzia Saerules Arktuos;113176 Wrote:I am glad to hear that you can finally admit your faith in there being no God ^_^

The burden of proof is on the believer.

Quote:If you "merely believe", you still believe there is no God... Adding the word 'merely' doesn't change the fact of your belief, silly Smile

I mean "merely believe" as opposed to "believe and believe that I know"

DvF Wrote:Is the title necessarily an expression of gnostic/strong atheism?

Sae Wrote:Yes, it is after all: what you believe.

That doesn't make me a gnostic or strong atheist. To be a gnostic or strong atheist I'd have to believe that I KNOW that God doesn't exist. I don't believe that.

Quote: You can know and still be wrong

No. Then I wouldn't "know" I'd just think I knew.

Quote: And yet, you still know there is no God... and the fact that you know there is no God is a gnostic position Smile

(I don't know there's no God because I'm not aware of his nonexistence because his nonexistence is indistinguishable from him doing some really good hiding.)

I don't believe I know there is no God (mostly because of the above point in brackets) so I'm not a gnostic atheist.

Quote: If you believe there is no god, you know that there is no god Smile

No!!! In case you didn't realize, these words mean different thing.

Knowledge implies belief. But belief doesn't imply knowledge.

Quote: I believe that I wouldn't win the lottery if I were to buy tickets for it... i know it infact.

No you don't because if you were to win the lottery that's proof you didn't really know it. How could you know it? How can you know you won't win? You can merely be sure that you won't.... however unlikely it is, it doesn't prove it's impossible.

Causality isn't even proven, however sure we can be that it exists we don't know that it does.

Quote: But just as all beliefs can be misplaced, so too can the reason for the belief (the knowledge) be misplaced Smile

You seem to think that if I believe something that is identical to me "knowing" it!!

theVOID Wrote:A belief that there is no god is a positive position. It is also position of gnosticism

Believing there is no God would only be a position of gnosticism if I also believe I KNOW there is no God.

Quote: the Agnostic version would be a belief that there is probably no god.

Believing there is no God leaves open his probability. If I believe there is no God that doesn't imply I believe God is impossible. I can believe there is no God and believe he is improbable OR impossible. Just as how, as I have been saying, I can OBVIOUSLY believe something with or without a belief that I also know it to be true.

Quote:What is your justification for this belief?

I don't have epistemic justification for it, I just know THAT I believe it, I don't know why. Why should I need to? I'm not making any claim of knowlege: Which is why I'm not a gnostic atheist.

I've already explained all this.

Quote:Is the justification sound and valid? (the premises are true and the conclusion follows).

An epistemic justification would be absurd because it would contradict my scepticism on the matter. Just as to justify my skepticism epistemically would be absurd because it would contradict itself. I justify my skepticism pragmatically and I don't justify it or anything else epistemically: I'm an epistemological skeptic.

I know that I'm aware and I know that tautologies must be true because they're true by definition. I know that logic can be valid. But I don't know WHY these things are true, because I don't know why anything exists or 'is' at all. I don't need to know why, I don't justify things epistemically. I justify things pragmatically and the only things I know I merely am aware of and don't know why.

Quote:You seem like you're committing the black swan fallacy.

Elaborate. (It seems to me like you're wrongly accusing me of the argument from ignorance or something like that).

To me it seems like I'm starting with the premise that gnostic atheists claim to know that God doesn't exist, I don't claim to know that, I merely claim that I believe God doesn't exist (not that I know).

Ok, how about this:

Premise 1: Knowledge implies belief, but belief doesn't imply knowledge.

Premise 2: Gnostic atheism is claiming to know that God doesn't exist.

Argument: Claiming knowledge implies claiming belief, but claiming belief doesn't imply claiming knowledge (following from premise 1). So if I claim to believe God doesn't exist, I am not - necessarily - claiming to know God doesn't exist.

Conclusion: I am not a gnostic atheist because I merely claim belief and not knowledge.



Reply
#14
RE: I believe there is no God.
DVF Wrote:The burden of proof is on the believer.

And you believe there is no God. What's your point?

Quote:I mean "merely believe" as opposed to "believe and believe that I know"

Believing is knowing.... 'merely' believing is still knowing Tongue

Quote:That doesn't make me a gnostic or strong atheist. To be a gnostic or strong atheist I'd have to believe that I KNOW that God doesn't exist. I don't believe that.

You actually do, and are performing something I like to call 'denial' Sleepy

Even if you know that knowledge is adaptable and that your interpretation might change: your current form is assertive that there is no god. Smile

Quote:No. Then I wouldn't "know" I'd just think I knew.

/yawn: you would know. There is no difference in the mind of the thinker between believing that pigs can fly and believing that pigs cannot fly. Perhaps the reality of the matter is that they both can and cannot, depending on what thinker is perceiving (that wether by imagination or their eyes or their scientific instruments).

You can know 2+2 is 4, or you can know 1+3 is 5, or you can know that 38472 - 38472 is to delete the cosmos.... and you can be right or wrong with that knowledge: but knowing comes before one's knowledge being correct or correct in only some situations or even not correct insofar as I can throw a planet with a flick of my pinkie.

Quote:(I don't know there's no God because I'm not aware of his nonexistence because his nonexistence is indistinguishable from him doing some really good hiding.)

I don't believe I know there is no God (mostly because of the above point in brackets) so I'm not a gnostic atheist.

If you insist, then I'm afraid you don't believe there is no god, and should probably stop insisting that you do Smile I know there is no God (save in some circumstances, ie: the minds of believers and non-believers alike), and I don't need to prove His lack of existence to anyone but myself. Just like I believe there are no unicorns, and there are no dragons, and there are no mousetraps that will chase after me in midair in attempt to eat me alive (yet), my knowledge of the nonexistence of some things is responsible for my firm belief that they do not exist, and this applies to gods and God and monkeys accurately wielding flamethrowers alike Smile

DVF Wrote:No you don't because if you were to win the lottery that's proof you didn't really know it. How could you know it? How can you know you won't win? You can merely be sure that you won't.... however unlikely it is, it doesn't prove it's impossible.

Causality isn't even proven, however sure we can be that it exists we don't know that it does.

<--- already explained that knowledge is the same experience whether right or wrong. I feel like you're using this argument: "You're not a real scotsman"... it's knowledge... it is real... it can be wrong... it can lead people to a meal.

How do I know I wont win? I evaluate the chances of me winning, and come to the conclusion that it will not happen. Hence: knowledge that I would not win. There is a small (very small) chance that I could be wrong, but it would hardly be pragmatic of me to think so Smile

Causality is proven to me, Doubtie. Proof (which you seem to tout about so highly) is as subjective as the evidence that led one to it. I know I won't win and will have wasted my money, nothing 'mere' about certainty. Call it a 'defeatist' attitude if you like, but I don't believe in chance, and infact hate 'the luck'. Me and 'the luck': not buddies. There is zero doubt in my mind that I will lose the lottery if I play it, and zero doubt in my mind that Earth will continue to orbit our star after I am long gone, and zero doubt in my mind that I am not hallucinating your existence.

Certainty is the stuff of knowledge. Belief is a certainty. The statement "I don't believe there is a god" is a statement that lacks just that: certainty. "I believe there is a god" is as certain a statement as "I believe there is no god".

Quote:You seem to think that if I believe something that is identical to me "knowing" it!!

Seem to? Such light terms of uncertainty come from you ^_^ I do think that believing something is knowing it, and knowing something is believing it.

'Belief', 'faith', 'knowledge', 'certainty'... all the same thing really. False beliefs, silly faith, incorrect knowledge, misplaced certainty... singalong singalong sing sing singalong singalong singalong sing sing singalong ^_^
Doubtie Wrote:Believing there is no God would only be a position of gnosticism if I also believe I KNOW there is no God.

To believe is to know, so what is your point? Tongue

Quote:Believing there is no God leaves open his probability. If I believe there is no God that doesn't imply I believe God is impossible. I can believe there is no God and believe he is improbable OR impossible. Just as how, as I have been saying, I can OBVIOUSLY believe something with or without a belief that I also know it to be true.

True, my believing that eating chocolate candy when I've got the flu and have been vomiting all day will lead to the flavor of stomach acid + chocolate candy coming up next time i vomit could be completely incorrect. Knowing that is to understand that one's knowledge (whatever it may be and however reasonable it may seem) could be entirely mistaken.

If you believed there was no God, then you've already looked into the probability, and found it lacking. You may even have been influenced by what you deem the impossibility of His existence. You actually can't believe anything without knowing it to be true, whether you be oblivious to this fact or not Smile But it is true that I can believe there are currently no flying pigs: but also that there are ways that a pig can fly. This is also knowledge, and incase you were wondering: pigs can fly, but none of them are currently doing so.

Quote:I don't have epistemic justification for it, I just know THAT I believe it, I don't know why. Why should I need to? I'm not making any claim of knowlege: Which is why I'm not a gnostic atheist.

I've already explained all this.

Actually, if gnosticism is believing that God(s) can be proven.... you've already proven it to yourself... therefore it would be very funny indeed if you were not a gnostic (I might even call it a contrary position). I'm a gnostic, but I hardly would try to prove the nonexistence of God(s) to others Tongue

You've poorly explained it... i should hardly think that if I told someone "go left then right then forward than left again" if they asked me how to get to a supermarket 120 miles away that I should be understood Tongue

Quote:An epistemic justification would be absurd because it would contradict my scepticism on the matter. Just as to justify my skepticism epistemically would be absurd because it would contradict itself. I justify my skepticism pragmatically and I don't justify it or anything else epistemically: I'm an epistemological skeptic.

If you are skeptical on the matter, then there really is nothing to discuss: you do not believe there is a god.

I don't think there is all that much pragmatism in your position at all Thinking Being pragmatic is to hold faith in things you deem the percentage of being wrong so low it is not worthy of wasting your time considering.... such allows one to efficiently construct their understanding of the universe along lines that make sense to them. Were your stance more pragmatic, I should expect a far less theoretical approach to the world.

Quote:I know that I'm aware and I know that tautologies must be true because they're true by definition. I know that logic can be valid. But I don't know WHY these things are true, because I don't know why anything exists or 'is' at all. I don't need to know why, I don't justify things epistemically. I justify things pragmatically and the only things I know I merely am aware of and don't know why.

If you don't need to know why: why do you need to allow the possibility of God(s) existing into your psyche? That isn't remotely pragmatic... just have faith and move on. The bold would indicate that you take lots of things on faith... yet you deny this. It is very silly, really Smile

Quote:Elaborate. (It seems to me like you're wrongly accusing me of the argument from ignorance or something like that).

To me it seems like I'm starting with the premise that gnostic atheists claim to know that God doesn't exist, I don't claim to know that, I merely claim that I believe God doesn't exist (not that I know).

Your belief that God doesn't exist is your knowledge in His nonexistence... so yes: you would be a gnostic... that is if you are not simply lying when you say that you believe God doesn't exist.

Quote:Ok, how about this:

Premise 1: Knowledge implies belief, but belief doesn't imply knowledge.

False, terms are fully equatable. Tomato, Tomahto, except nobody says tomahto.

Quote:Premise 2: Gnostic atheism is claiming to know that God doesn't exist.

It is actually knowing that God doesn't exist... whether you claim it or not is more a measure of how loudmouthed you are ^_^

Quote:Argument: Claiming knowledge implies claiming belief, but claiming belief doesn't imply claiming knowledge (following from premise 1). So if I claim to believe God doesn't exist, I am not - necessarily - claiming to know God doesn't exist.

Conclusion: I am not a gnostic atheist because I merely claim belief and not knowledge.

Were your premises true, your conclusion would also be. What claiming has to do with anything, I have no idea, and think should be removed from the argument.

Why do you think that claiming belief doesn't imply claiming knowledge? Smile Seems kinda silly to me ^_^
Please give me a home where cloud buffalo roam
Where the dear and the strangers can play
Where sometimes is heard a discouraging word
But the skies are not stormy all day
Reply
#15
RE: I believe there is no God.
Aerzia Saerules Arktuos;113285 Wrote:Believing is knowing.... 'merely' believing is still knowing Tongue

No. I've already explained this. Knowledge implies belief but belief doesn't imply knowledge.

You consider knowledge and belief to be identical and meaning? Then how am I supposed to have a decent discussion with you on this matter until you realize otherwise?

So theists KNOW that God exists do they simply because they believe it? Utter nonsense.


Quote:You actually do, and are performing something I like to call 'denial' Sleepy

If you understood the difference between knowledge and belief maybe you'd actually understand my argument.

Furthermore, maybe you would if you then also understood that gnostic atheism=claiming knowledge of God's nonexistence. And I do not claim knowledge.

Quote:/yawn: you would know.

No I wouldn't. You are using a retarded definition of "know".

Quote:You can know 2+2 is 4

Yes.

Quote:, or you can know 1+3 is 5
Not without redefining the meaning of "1", "3", and "5".

If the numbers 1, 3 and 5 mean what they normally do then no I can't know that 1+3=5.


Quote:If you insist, then I'm afraid you don't believe there is no god, and should probably stop insisting that you do Smile

You don't appear to understand what knowledge is.

Knowledge implies truth and belief, and maybe also justification. Belief doesn't imply knowledge, truth or justification.


Quote:<--- already explained that knowledge is the same experience whether right or wrong.

If by "explained" you mean "used my own bastardized definition of "knowledge"", then yes.

Quote: I feel like you're using this argument: "You're not a real scotsman"...

No because I'm using the correct definition.

If I claim that a Scotsman that isn't real isn't a real Scotsman isn't a real Scotman then that would of course be true. That's the equivalent of what I'm doing because I'm going by the proper definition of knowledge.


Quote:it's knowledge... it is real... it can be wrong... it can lead people to a meal.

Knowledge implies truth so it can't be wrong.

Quote:How do I know I wont win? I evaluate the chances of me winning, and come to the conclusion that it will not happen.

*yawns*

The fact there is a chance you might lose proves you don't know.

Quote: Hence: knowledge that I would not win.

No.

Quote: There is a small (very small) chance that I could be wrong

Hence why you don't know.

Quote: but it would hardly be pragmatic of me to think so Smile

Completely irrelevant, we're talking about epistemology here since knowledge is the subject. We are not talking about confidence, certainty or practical justification.

A gnostic atheist=Someone who claims that they KNOW there is no God. That's why epistemology is the subject here.

Quote:Causality is proven to me, Doubtie.

If it's proven to you then it must be proven absolutely true. But it can't be proven absolutely true because it's unfalsifiable. So you're talking crap.

Quote:Certainty is the stuff of knowledge.
No. Certainty is relative knowledge is absolute.

Quote: Belief is a certainty.
Yes but it's not necessarily knowledge. Please learn the difference between simple things like "I believe really strongly" and "I know".

Quote:I do think that believing something is knowing it, and knowing something is believing it.

Thank you for your explicit assertion of your bastardized definition.

Yes knowledge implies belief.

But no, belief doesn't imply knowledge.


Quote:To believe is to know, so what is your point? Tongue

My point is NO it isn't. Get a dictionary.

Dictionary.com Wrote:to perceive or understand as fact or truth; to apprehend clearly and with certainty: I know the situation fully.

It implies understanding FACT or TRUTH. It implies APPREHENDING these facts or truths with certainty, it is not merely certainty.


Quote:If you believed there was no God, then you've already looked into the probability, and found it lacking. You may even have been influenced by what you deem the impossibility of His existence.

I've already explicitly said many times all over these forums AND on this thread. That I do NOT regard God's existence impossible. That is the same as not claiming to KNOW he doesn't exist. Hence why I don't claim to know and am not a gnostic atheist.

Quote:You actually can't believe anything without knowing it to be true

You do talk some utter bullshit.

So, I guess all the theists are right then, because they can't believe without knowing their belief to be true(!!!!!!!!)


Quote:You've poorly explained it..

Yeah, I know I'm crap at explaining things but nevertheless I should still be able to explain simple shit like this.


Quote:If you are skeptical on the matter, then there really is nothing to discuss: you do not believe there is a god.

The point of my thread is that if I believe there is no God that doesn't imply that I believe I know there is no God because belief doesn't imply knowledge. So believing there is no God doesn't imply gnostic atheism.

You think belief does imply knowledge..... because you don't understand the difference.

According to you, all theists know that God exists. It's a stupid bastardized definition of "know" that you are using that is completely unhelpful and confuses things. If you know something then you must be right.


Quote:If you don't need to know why: why do you need to allow the possibility of God(s) existing into your psyche? That isn't remotely pragmatic... just have faith and move on. The bold would indicate that you take lots of things on faith... yet you deny this. It is very silly, really Smile

I allow the possibility of God's existence because it is intellectually honest and rational for me to do so because I can't prove God doesn't exist.


Quote:Your belief that God doesn't exist is your knowledge in His nonexistence...

No because belief doesn't imply knowledge.

Quote: so yes: you would be a gnostic...

No because I can believe something without knowledge.

Quote: that is if you are not simply lying when you say that you believe God doesn't exist.

I believe God doesn't exist because I have an opinion on the matter. I am not like the infant or lump of coal that is merely unaware of the proposition.

I can believe something with or without believing that I know(because belief doesn't imply knowledge). If I believe that I know God doesn't exist that is the same as believing God is impossible. I don't believe that. I believe that God doesn't exist but I don't believe I know he doesn't exist, hence why I don't believe he is impossible and I just believe he's improbable. Hence why I am an agnostic atheist.


Quote:Were your premises true, your conclusion would also be. What claiming has to do with anything, I have no idea, and think should be removed from the argument.

And if you understood the difference between knowledge and belief, you would also accept my premises.

Quote:Why do you think that claiming belief doesn't imply claiming knowledge? Smile Seems kinda silly to me ^_^

Because knowledge and belief are different things.

Reply
#16
RE: I believe there is no God.
The problem is with your argument theist do not say that they "know" (at least not all of them). When I can said you can not know that God exists almost all of the theists I know accepted it and said this is about faith not knowing.
Reply
#17
RE: I believe there is no God.
muhtesem insan;114022 Wrote:The problem is with your argument theist do not say that they "know" (at least not all of them).

How is that relevant to my argument?

Quote: When I can said you can not know that God exists almost all of the theists I know accepted it and said this is about faith not knowing.

Where is the relevance?
Reply
#18
RE: I believe there is no God.
The revelance is "not knowing" but believing that god does not exists, is no different than believing god does exists.
Reply
#19
RE: I believe there is no God.
It is different because the former is atheism and the latter is theism.
Reply
#20
RE: I believe there is no God.
It's still bigotry, just different sides.
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Quick Poll - Do you believe in God? Tiberius 1632 448044 May 13, 2023 at 3:34 pm
Last Post: Anomalocaris
  Why do you not believe in the concept of a God? johndoe122931 110 7830 June 19, 2021 at 12:21 pm
Last Post: Mermaid
  Maybe there's something like a god out there. Ryantology 38 2879 June 5, 2020 at 8:42 am
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
Lightbulb Here is why you should believe in God. R00tKiT 112 12884 April 11, 2020 at 5:03 pm
Last Post: The Valkyrie
  Here’s Why You SHOULDN’T Believe In God BrianSoddingBoru4 46 3907 April 5, 2020 at 8:03 am
Last Post: The Valkyrie
  Do you wish there's a god? Catharsis 580 40694 April 10, 2019 at 12:17 pm
Last Post: LadyForCamus
  Poll: 0.0% of Icelanders Under 25 Believe God Created The World blue grey brain 37 6219 January 24, 2019 at 6:30 pm
Last Post: GrandizerII
  Do u want there to be a God? Any God? Agnostico 304 28303 December 19, 2018 at 1:20 am
Last Post: Amarok
  scripture says we atheists believe in god android17ak47 17 3149 October 21, 2018 at 8:17 am
Last Post: Fireball
  I'd like to ask my fellow atheists if they would be happy to learn there was a god. Whateverist 88 16072 September 4, 2017 at 1:27 am
Last Post: Astonished



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)