Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: April 24, 2024, 3:25 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Nature comes first
#31
RE: Nature comes first
We're going back before time and nature. This is where the limitations of science are recognized.
Reply
#32
RE: Nature comes first
(February 18, 2019 at 10:06 pm)Lek Wrote:
(February 18, 2019 at 9:34 pm)Rahn127 Wrote: First we acknowledge that the universe exists.

From our observations of galaxies we see that most everything is moving away from us. There is also some expansion going on as well that contributes to this effect. The further away something is, the faster it is moving away from us.

As we turn back the hands of time, we see a universe where there are no galaxies, no stars, no matter, only energy.

You ask where nature comes from.
It comes from the existing energy of the universe.

The energy of the universe exists.
How would you get rid of it ?
Where would it go ?

So I guess you're saying that the energy of the universe always existed without a beginning and it created the universe.

I'm saying the energy of the universe exists. As we go forward in time from the big bang, we have expansion, then the formation of subatomic particles, and later simple atoms. Giant clouds (mostly hydrogen, with some helium and lithium) formed early stars and galaxies.

Our universe is unstable and instability seems to be part of nature.
If the energy of the universe remained stable, we wouldn't have a universe.

So we have energy in an unstable environment. Think of it like a jack in the box. You turn the crank and each time you turn everything seems stable.
And then you repeat the exact same thing you just did (turning the crank) and instead of doing nothing, it goes BOOM !!!

Nature has a way of doing that. Imagine how a star forms. Giant clouds of hydrogen form under gravity and draw closer to one another.
More and more and more hydrogen gather together. And it doesn't remain stable does it. It heats up. It changes. It begins to burst out and engulf itself into an explosion of heat and light, becoming a star.

No person or being or god is required. It's just gravity and hydrogen. And a star is born.

So yes, I would say that the energy of the universe has always been.
If it exists now, then it exists in every moment of time.
Insanity - Doing the same thing over and over again, expecting a different result
Reply
#33
RE: Nature comes first
Of course nature comes first.

Nature is selfish and cares nothing for those it screws.
Dying to live, living to die.
Reply
#34
RE: Nature comes first
(February 18, 2019 at 10:57 pm)Rahn127 Wrote:
(February 18, 2019 at 10:06 pm)Lek Wrote: So I guess you're saying that the energy of the universe always existed without a beginning and it created the universe.

I'm saying the energy of the universe exists. As we go forward in time from the big bang, we have expansion, then the formation of subatomic particles, and later simple atoms. Giant clouds  (mostly hydrogen, with some helium and lithium) formed early stars and galaxies.

Our universe is unstable and instability seems to be part of nature.
If the energy of the universe remained stable, we wouldn't have a universe.

So we have energy in an unstable environment. Think of it like a jack in the box. You turn the crank and each time you turn everything seems stable.
And then you repeat the exact same thing you just did (turning the crank) and instead of doing nothing, it goes BOOM !!!

Nature has a way of doing that. Imagine how a star forms. Giant clouds of hydrogen form under gravity and draw closer to one another.
More and more and more hydrogen gather together. And it doesn't remain stable does it. It heats up. It changes. It begins to burst out and engulf itself into an explosion of heat and light, becoming a star.

No person or being or god is required. It's just gravity and hydrogen. And a star is born.

So yes, I would say that the energy of the universe has always been.
If it exists now, then it exists in every moment of time.

Seems like your energy and my God share some common characteristics.  They both were never created and always existed.  The universe came from your energy and my God and we really can't scientifically prove where either the energy of the universe or God came from, but we both believe our versions.
Reply
#35
RE: Nature comes first
(February 18, 2019 at 11:18 pm)Lek Wrote:
(February 18, 2019 at 10:57 pm)Rahn127 Wrote: I'm saying the energy of the universe exists. As we go forward in time from the big bang, we have expansion, then the formation of subatomic particles, and later simple atoms. Giant clouds  (mostly hydrogen, with some helium and lithium) formed early stars and galaxies.

Our universe is unstable and instability seems to be part of nature.
If the energy of the universe remained stable, we wouldn't have a universe.

So we have energy in an unstable environment. Think of it like a jack in the box. You turn the crank and each time you turn everything seems stable.
And then you repeat the exact same thing you just did (turning the crank) and instead of doing nothing, it goes BOOM !!!

Nature has a way of doing that. Imagine how a star forms. Giant clouds of hydrogen form under gravity and draw closer to one another.
More and more and more hydrogen gather together. And it doesn't remain stable does it. It heats up. It changes. It begins to burst out and engulf itself into an explosion of heat and light, becoming a star.

No person or being or god is required. It's just gravity and hydrogen. And a star is born.

So yes, I would say that the energy of the universe has always been.
If it exists now, then it exists in every moment of time.

Seems like your energy and my God share some common characteristics.  They both were never created and always existed.  The universe came from your energy and my God and we really can't scientifically prove where either the energy of the universe or God came from, but we both believe our versions.

With one very large difference.
I have evidence that the energy of the universe exists.

Do you have any evidence that your god exists ?
Insanity - Doing the same thing over and over again, expecting a different result
Reply
#36
RE: Nature comes first
(February 18, 2019 at 11:22 pm)Rahn127 Wrote:
(February 18, 2019 at 11:18 pm)Lek Wrote: Seems like your energy and my God share some common characteristics.  They both were never created and always existed.  The universe came from your energy and my God and we really can't scientifically prove where either the energy of the universe or God came from, but we both believe our versions.

With one very large difference.
I have evidence that the energy of the universe exists.

Do you have any evidence that your god exists ?
Do you know what your energy is made of?  Has it been gathered, tested and analyzed. It could be my God for all you know. What is that pure energy?
Reply
#37
RE: Nature comes first
(February 18, 2019 at 11:36 pm)Lek Wrote:
(February 18, 2019 at 11:22 pm)Rahn127 Wrote: With one very large difference.
I have evidence that the energy of the universe exists.

Do you have any evidence that your god exists ?
Do you know what your energy is made of?  Has it been gathered, tested and analyzed. It could be my God for all you know. What is that pure energy?

It's energy. Whether it's also your Bible God is something you will have to demonstrate.
Reply
#38
RE: Nature comes first
At work.

(February 18, 2019 at 11:36 pm)Lek Wrote: Do you know what your energy is made of?  Has it been harnessed,tested and analyzed. It could be my God for all you know. What is that pure energy?

"That energy" became everything we see, can see and can only infer (Dark matter/energy).

As for the testing of "That energy"? What might you think the large Hadron collider is trying to probe?

If your diety is 'Everything'... Then are you, parhps, a deist? Or a Panytheist? Even a Taoist? Or some other, similar 'Nature worshipper'?

Smile
Reply
#39
RE: Nature comes first
(February 18, 2019 at 11:41 pm)Peebo-Thuhlu Wrote: At work.

(February 18, 2019 at 11:36 pm)Lek Wrote: Do you know what your energy is made of?  Has it been harnessed,tested and analyzed. It could be my God for all you know.  What is that pure energy?

"That energy" became everything we see, can see and can only infer (Dark matter/energy).

As for the testing of "That energy"? What might you think the large Hadron collider is trying to probe?

If your diety is 'Everything'... Then are you, parhps, a deist? Or a Panytheist? Or some other, similar 'Nature worshipper'?

Smile
No. I'm not any of those. What I'm saying is that you don't know what that "energy" is, but because of your limited worldview you automatically rule out that this energy could have created the universe rather than have become it. You exist in a box and will not wander beyond its boundaries.
Reply
#40
RE: Nature comes first
How desperate of a believer do you have to be to cling to "what was before the universe was created" in order to "prove" your God? People that wrote the Bible (or any holy book) believed that supernatural beings were all around them: that they possess humans and cause illnesses, Paul believed he was seeing beings and people walking on clouds with heaven being divided in layers and Jesus was described as someone who had a popular belief of the time that the demons lived in the desert (Matthew 12:43) and therefore he went there to find the devil.

And now it's all about because people don't know yet for sure what happened before existence of the universe. Humans are not going to know everything, so will the theists just demand every time there is a gap in the knowledge that that is their God?
teachings of the Bible are so muddled and self-contradictory that it was possible for Christians to happily burn heretics alive for five long centuries. It was even possible for the most venerated patriarchs of the Church, like St. Augustine and St. Thomas Aquinas, to conclude that heretics should be tortured (Augustine) or killed outright (Aquinas). Martin Luther and John Calvin advocated the wholesale murder of heretics, apostates, Jews, and witches. - Sam Harris, "Letter To A Christian Nation"
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Are god and religion ways of saying "screw you" to nature? ShinyCrystals 18 906 January 8, 2024 at 12:27 pm
Last Post: Angrboda
  Who or what is "Nature's god" BananaFlambe 26 1823 December 4, 2023 at 5:15 pm
Last Post: arewethereyet
  Signature in the Cell: DNA as Evidence for Design, beside Nature's Laws/Fine-Tuning. Nishant Xavier 54 2857 July 8, 2023 at 8:23 am
Last Post: Fake Messiah
  Most humans aren't too logical when it comes to world views and how to go about it. Mystic 28 3967 October 9, 2018 at 8:59 am
Last Post: Alan V
  Nature's Laws Freedom4me 307 40879 May 27, 2015 at 8:33 pm
Last Post: comet
  Tory MP 'comes out' as atheist. TubbyTubby 5 1755 January 17, 2015 at 4:42 pm
Last Post: Fidel_Castronaut
  What comes from your mind during meditation? ComradeMeow 15 3250 August 24, 2014 at 3:39 am
Last Post: Whateverist
  Q. About Rationality and Nature Mudhammam 21 3995 August 18, 2014 at 8:15 am
Last Post: Thumpalumpacus
  Breathtaking Time-Lapse Videos That Make You Love Nature Mudhammam 3 1924 January 14, 2014 at 9:45 am
Last Post: AtheistUnicorn
  The Irrational Nature Of Atheism - An Explanation Of God, Gods And Goddesses The Theist 60 30846 July 9, 2012 at 7:50 pm
Last Post: Minimalist



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)