Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: April 26, 2024, 8:03 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi Snuffed
#31
RE: Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi Snuffed
Okay. I never said the circumstances were the same. But... Please... enlighten me.
If you're frightened of dying, and you're holding on, you'll see devils tearing your life away. But if you've made your peace, then the devils are really angels, freeing you from the Earth.
Reply
#32
RE: Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi Snuffed
(October 29, 2019 at 12:03 am)EgoDeath Wrote:
(October 28, 2019 at 4:59 pm)onlinebiker Wrote: I do. But when their facts have nothing to do with the subject - I don't.

Nobody - myself included - is trying to sing praises of President Trump. I am not endorsing his fitness to the presidency. I am not defending any of his bad behavior.

I am pointing out what political cunts the ( D )s are being about this operation - which was TEXTBOOK PERFECT - including President Trump keeping a lid on information on a need to know basis. He probably did just get lucky.


But it doesn't excuse Pelosi and the others of her ilk for going straight for Trump's nutsack. It's simply more partisan bullshit.

Don't waste your breath, OB.

I'm interested to know if the fanatical Trump haters here reacted this way when bin Laden was killed under the Obama admin.

The attitude here on this forum about Trump literally reminds me of South Park. It's comical, actually.

Just for suggesting that maybe their reactions are a bit over the top, I'll be chastised. It's a joke.

"Fanatical"?


Any sane person will have a problem with an abusive jackass bully who abuses their office scapegoating and vilifying anyone who questions him and constantly undermines his own intel.

50 former REPUBLICAN intel agents warned America not to elect him during his run. So it isn't just "liberals". 700+ politically diverse prosecutors said anyone else would have been indicted based on the report. Even Fox News Legal Analyst Judge Napolitano says the Ukraine call, based upon the WH own release is a huge problem. And lets not forget him daring Russia to interfere during his run. On top of standing next to Communist trained KGB thug PUTIN, while in office, siding with him and denying his own intel. On top of inviting China to interfere with our elections on camera.

"Fanatical" is a bullshit word used by those who do not want to face the fact that the person holding that office is dangerous and a threat to out global and national security. It is hardly "fanatical" to want to hold power to account to insure our institutions stay in tact.

I am sick of this bullshit. When someone is sounding the alarm, you don't shit on the people warning you. Just like it is fucking stupid to deny global warming. He is the problem, not me. 

Forgive me for not wanting my country to compromised by our enemies.
Reply
#33
RE: Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi Snuffed
(October 29, 2019 at 7:00 am)Brian37 Wrote:
(October 29, 2019 at 12:03 am)EgoDeath Wrote: Don't waste your breath, OB.

I'm interested to know if the fanatical Trump haters here reacted this way when bin Laden was killed under the Obama admin.

The attitude here on this forum about Trump literally reminds me of South Park. It's comical, actually.

Just for suggesting that maybe their reactions are a bit over the top, I'll be chastised. It's a joke.

"Fanatical"?


Any sane person will have a problem with an abusive jackass bully who abuses their office scapegoating and vilifying anyone who questions him and constantly undermines his own intel.

50 former REPUBLICAN intel agents warned America not to elect him during his run. So it isn't just "liberals". 700+ politically diverse prosecutors said anyone else would have been indicted based on the report. Even Fox News Legal Analyst Judge Napolitano says the Ukraine call, based upon the WH own release is a huge problem. And lets not forget him daring Russia to interfere during his run. On top of standing next to Communist trained KGB thug PUTIN, while in office, siding with him and denying his own intel. On top of inviting China to interfere with our elections on camera.

"Fanatical" is a bullshit word used by those who do not want to face the fact that the person holding that office is dangerous and a threat to out global and national security. It is hardly "fanatical" to want to hold power to account to insure our institutions stay in tact.

I am sick of this bullshit. When someone is sounding the alarm, you don't shit on the people warning you. Just like it is fucking stupid to deny global warming. He is the problem, not me. 

Forgive me for not wanting my country to compromised by our enemies.

Yes - you and your ilk are fanatics.

Go back here on the board - less than 60 days after President Trump was elected - there was calls for impeachment.

......

Know what you need to do?

Find a good ( D ) candidate - someone who isn't a flaming leftist - like Hillary - and people will vote for them....

I voted for Obama - he was a good reasonable candidate.


Or bring on a whacko - and we can "enjoy" the Cheeto in Charge for another 4 years...
Reply
#34
RE: Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi Snuffed
Quote:Forgive me for not wanting my country to compromised by our enemies.

But one of your country's enemies is now dead because Trump approved the mission that killed him.  Surely that counts for something?

Boru
‘But it does me no injury for my neighbour to say there are twenty gods or no gods. It neither picks my pocket nor breaks my leg.’ - Thomas Jefferson
Reply
#35
RE: Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi Snuffed
(October 29, 2019 at 7:23 am)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote:
Quote:Forgive me for not wanting my country to compromised by our enemies.

But one of your country's enemies is now dead because Trump approved the mission that killed him.  Surely that counts for something?

Boru
Only if a ( D ) does it.
Can you imagine the shitstorm if President Trump changed his party affiliation back to ( D )?
I would LMAO for weeks....
Smile
Reply
#36
RE: Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi Snuffed
(October 29, 2019 at 7:23 am)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote:
Quote:Forgive me for not wanting my country to compromised by our enemies.

But one of your country's enemies is now dead because Trump approved the mission that killed him.  Surely that counts for something?

Boru

No, sorry, it does not wipe out all the other damage he has done. Reagan, as wrong as he was with Iran/Contra, still was not using that office to benefit himself. 

Trump wasn't lying about a blowjob either. Nixon, at least had the morals to know when to quit.

This does not wipe out his years of toxic and dangerous bullying, nor demoralizing and undermining his own intel. And he still, even with this kill, still undid vital containment of 100s more because of his withdraw of troops. And there is not much division by our intel about what a bad move that was.

You don't give credit to the asshole who wrecks the car just because he fixes a flat after the fact but still fucks up the highway.

This isn't about one event with him. This is a collection of bad behavior and abuse of power long term. He has undermined our credibility globally and this kill does not change that.
Reply
#37
RE: Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi Snuffed
This thread is about the bad behaviorof ( D )s - and Brian must make it an attack on Presodent Trump.

And he claims to not be a fanatic.

Point made.
Reply
#38
RE: Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi Snuffed
(October 29, 2019 at 7:37 am)Brian37 Wrote:
(October 29, 2019 at 7:23 am)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: But one of your country's enemies is now dead because Trump approved the mission that killed him.  Surely that counts for something?

Boru

No, sorry, it does not wipe out all the other damage he has done. Reagan, as wrong as he was with Iran/Contra, still was not using that office to benefit himself. 

Trump wasn't lying about a blowjob either. Nixon, at least had the morals to know when to quit.

This does not wipe out his years of toxic and dangerous bullying, nor demoralizing and undermining his own intel. And he still, even with this kill, still undid vital containment of 100s more because of his withdraw of troops. And there is not much division by our intel about what a bad move that was.

You don't give credit to the asshole who wrecks the car just because he fixes a flat after the fact but still fucks up the highway.

This isn't about one event with him. This is a collection of bad behavior and abuse of power long term. He has undermined our credibility globally and this kill does not change that.

Well, actually, this thread IS about 'one event with him'.  Trump is truly a reprehensible, vile caricature of a human being, but can you at least see your way clear that the death of a prominent terrorist is (for the moment, at least) is a good thing, and that Trump is, in large measure, responsible for that?

Boru
‘But it does me no injury for my neighbour to say there are twenty gods or no gods. It neither picks my pocket nor breaks my leg.’ - Thomas Jefferson
Reply
#39
RE: Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi Snuffed
Really? Just How is trump responsible for this?
Reply
#40
RE: Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi Snuffed
He had to sign off on the mission.

Boru
‘But it does me no injury for my neighbour to say there are twenty gods or no gods. It neither picks my pocket nor breaks my leg.’ - Thomas Jefferson
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Al Qaeda vs. ISIS: Al-Zawahiri Declares War on Al-Baghdadi pocaracas 19 3068 September 12, 2015 at 5:49 am
Last Post: Fidel_Castronaut



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)