Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: December 12, 2024, 1:50 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
The code that is DNA
RE: The code that is DNA
(December 20, 2019 at 7:44 pm)Gae Bolga Wrote: A person who gets their rocks off instantaneously might not realize why time is a factor.

For time to be a factor it needs to have a causal relationship with micro/macroevolution, which it doesn't. You can, of course, use time to measure the duration that a given species took to branch off or transition into another, just like you can measure the distance that same species traveled during that transition; but neither time nor distance are factors in that transition.

It's understandable to confuse the measurement of a dependant variable, with the independent variable.
RE: The code that is DNA
Quote:For time to be a factor it needs to have a causal relationship with micro/macroevolution,

Which it does 

Quote:It's understandable to confuse the measurement of a dependant variable, with the independent variables.
Which were not
"Change was inevitable"


Nemo sicut deus debet esse!

[Image: Canada_Flag.jpg?v=1646203843]



 “No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM


      
RE: The code that is DNA
When you're done embarrassing yourself, John..I'll only mention that both micro and macro evolution have been observed in the lab and in the field, and some unit of time is a positive requirement of what we've observed. Is this really the hill you want to die on? Does it matter that much to you?
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!
RE: The code that is DNA
(December 20, 2019 at 6:59 pm)SUNGULA Wrote:
Quote:it's like saying the difference between a bath and a shower is the time people spend taking them.
No i's more like saying a longer shower and a shorter shower .

Is that old lady you robbed doing ok now?
I have it on good information of your criminal conduct

(December 20, 2019 at 9:18 pm)Gae Bolga Wrote: When you're done embarrassing yourself, John..I'll only mention that both micro and macro evolution have been observed in the lab and in the field, and some unit of time is a positive requirement of what we've observed. Is this really the hill you want to die on? Does it matter that much to you?

It is believed that macro evolution takes deep time to accomplish, what macro has been observed in a lab?
RE: The code that is DNA
Quote:Is that old lady you robbed doing ok now?
Well considering she doesn't exist .Unlike Tours straw man .Just use your imagination .After all you made her up.


Quote:I have it on good information of your criminal conduct
Yeah i imagine you have a lot of information on the thing you made up .To bad unlike Tours straw man that's all it is .
"Change was inevitable"


Nemo sicut deus debet esse!

[Image: Canada_Flag.jpg?v=1646203843]



 “No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM


      
RE: The code that is DNA
(December 20, 2019 at 5:23 pm)John 6IX Breezy Wrote:
(December 20, 2019 at 5:10 pm)JackRussell Wrote: I did not suggest ALL speciation takes deep time.  Otherwise it would not be observed in the lab (Lenski) or in fish populations. From the LCA to now is a different matter. Don’t quote papers out of context with this discussion.

That wasn't a paper that was a textbook. It doesn't matter what things you meant to suggest deep time applies to, time is not the distinguishing factor between micro and macroevolution. Everything takes time; it's like saying the difference between a bath and a shower is the time people spend taking them.
Well it does. A bath consumes 10 times the fresh water of a shower. More resources are consumed by a bath than a shower.

A bath perpetuates any bacteria washed from the skin. A shower does not.

I could go on.

The point is that your simplistic analogy ignores confounding factors. Science does not.

(December 20, 2019 at 5:37 pm)Yukon_Jack Wrote:
(December 20, 2019 at 5:11 pm)SUNGULA Wrote: Nope i stated a fact back by the fact he did 

By all means


Yeah well that never happened unlike Tours straw man .Which is of course why his doesn't bother me .


Had to know something that never happened .Unlike Tour whom i watched do so . 


All right then you stand by that thing that never happened and i'll stand by the thing that did happen .I think that makes us both happy .

You talk like a juvenile, no offense, so  until you can back something up, you should refrain from posting meaningless accusations.
Your feeble attempt to suppress your interlocutors is noted, but futile. 

If you are unable to answer even simple questions, that is your problem, nobody else's.

(December 20, 2019 at 6:59 pm)John 6IX Breezy Wrote: The error of time can be illustrated, perhaps poorly, by taking any two species and asking what distinguishes the two. The difference between a cat and a dog, for example, isn't X number of seconds. Among other things it is the type and number of nucleotides, genes, or chromosomes they have; and how they are phenotypically expressed.

And cats and dogs share a common ancestor. Along with bears.

Had you a point you wished to make?
RE: The code that is DNA
(December 21, 2019 at 3:43 pm)Abaddon_ire Wrote: The point is that your simplistic analogy ignores confounding factors. Science does not.

All analogies are simplistic by design; they help break down more complex themes into digestible portions. You might as well have said my analogy was bad because showers don't have genes.
RE: The code that is DNA
Quote:All analogies are simplistic by design; they help break down more complex themes into digestible portions. You might as well have said my analogy was bad because showers don't have genes.
Doesn't change the fact that even as an analogy it was bad
"Change was inevitable"


Nemo sicut deus debet esse!

[Image: Canada_Flag.jpg?v=1646203843]



 “No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM


      
RE: The code that is DNA
(December 21, 2019 at 4:40 pm)SUNGULA Wrote: Doesn't change the fact that even as an analogy it was bad

No; Abaddon pointing to other variables besides time as possible distinctions between baths and showers, is precisely my point. So he's on the right track. I just thought calling an analogy simplistic was a bit funny, so I addressed that.
RE: The code that is DNA
[Image: icon_quote.jpg]Mr. Potatohead:
It is believed that macro evolution takes deep time to accomplish, what macro has been observed in a lab?

I love this argument. It is so well thought out. Think about it, a person could walk from their front door to their mailbox that is 257 steps away, but a person could never walk from New York to California step by step.



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Signature in the Cell: DNA as Evidence for Design, beside Nature's Laws/Fine-Tuning. Nishant Xavier 54 4642 July 8, 2023 at 8:23 am
Last Post: Fake Messiah
  Are humans half aliens? Human DNA question Signa92 14 2432 December 30, 2018 at 12:34 am
Last Post: Rahn127
Brick Atheist moral code Void 45 17271 March 24, 2015 at 8:14 pm
Last Post: I Am Not A Human Being



Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)