A.S.K. your way to proof.

[LastPoet]

It is known that Drich isn't acked even by other christians, tolerated OFC, via being christian and a god boy. The reason he is not banned yet is under secrecy, the fall of this forum.

[BrianSoddingBoru4]

It is known that Drich isn't acked even by other christians, tolerated OFC, via being christian and a god boy. The reason he is not banned yet is under secrecy, the fall of this forum.

The reason Drich isn’t banned here is three fold:

1. He rarely gets reported.

2. When he gets reported, it’s never for something ban-worthy.

3. Like it or not, he stays within the rules. Sometimes just barely, but we don’t ban people for almost breaking the rules.


Boru

[Drich]

Listened to it.

So... a strange ramble?

Weird "I can talk to people with my mind' comment about 06:00 minutes in.

So... at 07:00-ish you're commenting about 'Doubring Thomas'. Okay, Thomas got to physically POKE at the resurrected Jesus.
Strange that said figure didn't stick around to KEEP letting people poke at said evidence.
Now all we ahve are second, third, fourth etc accounts and NOTHING else.
No actual, specific hill. No actual specific tomb. Characters from magic book that don't actually, quite, line up with archeology. etc.

Yay! YOU had a personal thing inside your brain. How might you show that 'Feeling' inside your brain has any comport to the obviously uncaring reality around us all?

Not at work.  

Again... my examples were of regular people receiving what they need to establish and maintain a system of belief. THIS INVITATION EXTENDS TO YOU AS WELL. God is offering the Holy Spirit. IE God Himself is willing to work with you one on one. no preacher no priest no prophets. So what you will then have is first hand proof. as what better proof of God is there than God himself?

---

I remember A/S/K. It's that method by which you can successfully convince yourself of anything as long as you keep at it long enough; and if you die before it works, it's your fault for not keeping at it longer, it definitely WOULD have worked, because it ALWAYS works, exceptions notwithstanding.

there's about 8 more mins more worth of explanation to it. but glad to see you remember something.

[Foxaèr]

With that kind of humor at your disposal, it makes one wonder at the authenticity of your claims.

[Drich]

Bich just got banned "elsewhere".

They asked me to come and join, they are free to have me leave. In fact they(admins who asked me to join) could have just asked and i would never go back.

I get it though.. so long as I leave room for speculation and doubt to my abilities or story you all feel comfortable enough to keep me around. However when I show enough proof or take away your doubt cushion, and I am panning out to be exactly who I said I was all along.. Time to rework the rules to keep the mob's pride intact. People can not stand someone living a life that makes their out to be a lie. And the deeper one is invested in this lie the more the urgence there is to get rid of me, even the site of my posts which were all self contasined IE I never posted on anyone else's stuff unless asked to do so. That was too much even is that level of censorship is usually reserved for fascists.

After all can't have one christian shut down and run off a whole website of people. People who can't seem to break or refute one of his biblical arguments.

What is ironic, is that what most of you were trying to do "Ignore me and I will go away/don't answer my questions, fill my threads with non related commentary" was exactly what i forced you to do by putting the OP in video form. IT forced people into silence, people who would otherwise disrupt my efforts by using strawman and red herrings, were forced to remain topically silent, which allowed me to pick and choose. So rather than spend 4 hours a day there.. I was down to about 15 mins. which frees me up to make more videos and answer more serious questions.


fell free to repost if you want to stir the pot over yond..

---

It isn't like they didn't know what they were getting when they let him in.

What get me is that he claimed somebody invited him over there. Probably his invisible friend.

actually it was a key admin as far as i am aware.

gots a poop load of PMs on this website from them. As there was some technical difficulty getting me signed up at first. so there are about 5 where they did different things on their side to allow my name and avatar to be used... in fact if i remember they actually set up my account for me.

but I don't think im allowed to share pms as a matter of rules here.

---

It is known that Drich isn't acked even by other christians, tolerated OFC, via being christian and a god boy. The reason he is not banned yet is under secrecy, the fall of this forum.

this forum has not fallen. activity was cut when 3/4 of the christians left in dec last year. (when catholic lady left with about 8 others) Without the yin to your atheist yang, there was nothing more to say. I can only do so much. how long do you seriously think you will be up for writing long thought provoking posts just to have people give it a like without any meaningful response?

if having an atheist only website would have worked then the thinking atheist or 1/2 of the other ones who have faded away would still be here. heck AF.com would not be shrivelling on the vine with 4 active topics in their christian/religion section. That subject is what literally defines you it should be somewhat active. there maybe 500 replys in 4 topics so far this month? I alone generate that in a week on one site.

lets see what happens to AD.. maybe I'm wrong. maybe you all need a place where you can get pat on the back for toeing the company line/cut and paste each others singular thinking/thoughts

[Nay_Sayer]

Always Spaghetti. Kisses.

RAmen

[Mister Agenda]

Drich, is there any way you could make at least a token effort to not be so full of yourself? Bragging on the tremendous impact you've had on the forum is not only not a good look; it's not remotely true. You're still here because you follow the rules, at least close enough for horseshoes, and that's all any of us have to do to stay here.

[Foxaèr]

Drich, is there any way you could make at least a token effort to not be so full of yourself? Bragging on the tremendous impact you've had on the forum is not only not a good look; it's not remotely true. You're still here because you follow the rules, at least close enough for horseshoes, and that's all any of us have to do to stay here.

I guess some forums have higher standards than this one.

[Drich]

Drich, is there any way you could make at least a token effort to not be so full of yourself? Bragging on the tremendous impact you've had on the forum is not only not a good look; it's not remotely true. You're still here because you follow the rules, at least close enough for horseshoes, and that's all any of us have to do to stay here.

Catholic lady and the group that left did not break any rules either as far as I know they are still in good standing and could return any time. They left because the pendulum swings both ways. IE the rules protect you guys from what some may deem overly sensitive feelings. just like they protect me from your sore bottoms as well.

And I am not bragging about anything that I know of. and IF YOU WOULD READ what I wrote I said there was a decline in this forum BECAUSE the OTHER CHRISTIANS LEFT!!!

Which left you tards with no one to oppose your specific level of religious understanding.

And I made the observation that they literally changed the meaning of the rules over there, as this debate already came up and the no spamming rule was deemed not to have applied to me or what i was doing... but then i guess enough atheist threaten to quit the site, and now the same rule the tried to charge me with before, and i was exonerated from, now condemned me. They didn't even change the wording, just the rule's supposed intent.

In fact the rule for spam is about the same here.
Spamming is not allowed. Spamming includes, but is not limited to:

• Creating multiple threads with the same or similar thread subject in a short space of time.Repeatedly posting responses to existing threads that are unrelated to the current discussion(s) in the thread.
  
• Repeatedly posting links, copy/pasted content, or scripture verses, unless they are relevant to the thread and have the member's own comments added to them.
  
• Posting an abundance of content you've pre-written for purposes other than forum use (i.e. essays, blog posts, etc.)
  
  

there: 2) No spam Posting links to other websites in order to promote people, products, or ideas when not part of related discussions may be regarded as spam. Repeatedly posting the same material may also be regarded as engaging in spamming the forum.

Here's the thing, the people products or ideas were original content created for the express purpose to be a thread opener. It is no different than if I were to write everything all out. same idea, same topic, same exposition. the only thing this did... it took away the troll's ability to hammer me about my use of grammar and spelling. it also showed ability not consistent with the drich is incompetent narrative. it also provided a way to verify alot of my back ground story concerning my business and projects as that was also apart of my 7 or 8 year old youtube account page.

The ideas I brought with the video were not the issue. it was the legitimacy and me taking away the trolling opportunities/the low lying fruit that the trolls like to easily feed on that was the problem. Because any truth I provided here makes it harder to just ignore or use a sweeping dismissal on your side.

Again not bragging just an exit analysis. 

---

Drich, is there any way you could make at least a token effort to not be so full of yourself? Bragging on the tremendous impact you've had on the forum is not only not a good look; it's not remotely true. You're still here because you follow the rules, at least close enough for horseshoes, and that's all any of us have to do to stay here.

I guess some forums have higher standards than this one.

higher=elitist/Atheist only or christians on the fence standards. yes.

free thinking, independant unpopular thought, 1st amendment modeled standards. ah, no.

here is the unwritten rule that separates the two..
I-enst, Order tou bee a meme-ber of zist vebsiten! Ich, moost sink unt sprecken to zee ath-ziest, haas an ath-ziest! Nine, ut-zide sprecken vill bee toll-irated!

[Simon Moon]

I get it though.. so long as I leave room for speculation and doubt to my abilities or story you all feel comfortable enough to keep me around. However when I show enough proof or take away your doubt cushion, and I am panning out to be exactly who I said I was all along.. Time to rework the rules to keep the mob's pride intact. People can not stand someone living a life that makes their out to be a lie. And the deeper one is invested in this lie the more the urgence there is to get rid of me, even the site of my posts which were all self contasined IE I never posted on anyone else's stuff unless asked to do so. That was too much even is that level of censorship is usually reserved for fascists.

After all can't have one christian shut down and run off a whole website of people. People who can't seem to break or refute one of his biblical arguments.

What is ironic, is that what most of you were trying to do "Ignore me and I will go away/don't answer my questions, fill my threads with non related commentary" was exactly what i forced you to do by putting the OP in video form. IT forced people into silence, people who would otherwise disrupt my efforts by using strawman and red herrings, were forced to remain topically silent, which allowed me to pick and choose. So rather than spend 4 hours a day there.. I was down to about 15 mins. which frees me up to make more videos and answer more serious questions.

I think it's kind of cute that that's the way you see it.

Dritch, your arguments are about as effective as rubber knife at a gun fight.

They are all loaded with: flawed epistemology, fallacies, appeals to ancient texts, and your personal feelings. I can guarantee that your arguments have not affected anyone that understands: good standards of evidence, the correct application of skepticism, critical thinking, and logic.

If you want to brag about the possibility that you convinced someone who's just as gullible as you are, then have at it.