Is it always racism?

[brokenreflector]

If a white person murders a black person is that always evidence that they're racist?

If a white person accidentally kills a black person is that always evidence that they're racist?

If a white police officer apprehends or arrests a black person on good grounds or bad is that always evidence that the white police officer is racist?

If the answer is no to all three questions, then why are so many liberals and demagogues like Al Sharpton so certain that George Floyd's death is the result of racism?

[ignoramus]

If a white person whose life is not directly threatened intentionally and casually continues to kill a black person anyway, is that racism? Fuck yeah.
I don't recall that cop "accidentally on purpose" ever killing a white dude.

Dude, racism is alive and well in America. Acknowledge that simple fact first. Otherwise you can't fix a problem which doesn't exist.
Which is exactly what a racist would argue me thinks...

[brewer]

Trolling?

[brokenreflector]

If a white person whose life is not directly threatened intentionally and casually continues to kill a black person anyway, is that racism? Fuck yeah.

In all seriousness, could you explain your reasoning? Because your argument seems to be a non-sequitur. I'll even try to steelman it for you.

If a white person isn't actually threatened or doesn't feel threatened by a black person and the white person kills the black person, then this is evidence that the white person decided to kill the black person simply because of their skin color.

Is that your argument?

[brewer]

Is Tou Thao white?

The two black cops that tased the two black students in Atlanta were racist.

[brokenreflector]

The two black cops that tased the two black students in Atlanta were racist.

Yeah. I believe liberals would say they have internalized racism.

[no one]

When a human kills another human for no reason it is evidence that they are a piece of shit!

[Fireball]

In response to the original question, no, it isn't. If I asked the same question but substituted "religion" for "racism", how would you feel? I'll let you sort out the religious oppression perpetrated by the RCC and other religious institutions as a homework assignment. You don't get to only ask questions, you have to answer some, too. If you're not Catholic, just know that that is where xtianity started, and all you splinter group members share the blame for what they did before.

[Gawdzilla Sama]

Liberals are not above finding groups that they can hate.

[brokenreflector]

In response to the original question, no, it isn't. If I asked the same question but substituted "religion" for "racism", how would you feel?

The same. Why would I feel differently?

If a Christian murders an atheist is that always evidence that they're a bigot?

If a Christian accidentally kills an atheist is that always evidence that they're a bigot?

If a Christian police officer apprehends or arrests an atheist on good grounds or bad is that always evidence that the Christian police officer is a bigot?

Answer is still no to all three.