Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: December 23, 2024, 7:13 am
Thread Rating:
Kenosha Shooter Kyle Rittenhouse
|
(September 9, 2020 at 4:00 pm)SUNGULA Wrote: Stalking is wrong period Jaysus, you sound JUST like my ex-girlfriends. Boru
‘I can’t be having with this.’ - Esmeralda Weatherwax
RE: Kenosha Shooter Kyle Rittenhouse
September 9, 2020 at 5:03 pm
(This post was last modified: September 9, 2020 at 5:04 pm by onlinebiker.)
(September 9, 2020 at 4:36 pm)Rev. Rye Wrote:I notice you flatly ignore that Martin escalated this event to a physical altercation. (As indicated by physical evidence). I guess you have to, to be able to stick to the "he's an angel" theory - rather than he was a hot-headed punk who started swinging......(September 9, 2020 at 4:00 pm)SUNGULA Wrote: Stalking is wrong period (September 9, 2020 at 4:50 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote:(September 9, 2020 at 4:00 pm)SUNGULA Wrote: Stalking is wrong period Do they get "ex" status before or after the PPO? (September 9, 2020 at 3:12 pm)SUNGULA Wrote:(September 9, 2020 at 10:27 am)Angrboda Wrote: Okay. Now make an argument from that fact without running afoul of the genetic fallacy. I'm not even sure that what you say is true.It's generic fallacy to simply point out that the original intent of fire arms was military in nature . Um, what? RE: Kenosha Shooter Kyle Rittenhouse
September 9, 2020 at 6:11 pm
(This post was last modified: September 9, 2020 at 6:13 pm by BrianSoddingBoru4.)
(September 9, 2020 at 9:45 am)SUNGULA Wrote:(September 9, 2020 at 8:58 am)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: Nonsense. A gun can be used to procure food, to target shoot, for trophy hunting, as a threat, etc.Guns were invented for war hunting was a later development . Handguns and Assault Rifle were designed with human targets in mind . That is simply a fact . So what? That doesn’t mean that they’re single-use items. Bows and arrows were originally designed to kill animals, but there are plenty of archers around today who’ve never done that. Tin openers were originally designed to (big surprise) open tins, but I’ve got one that makes a dandy fipple scraper. Bel’s point was that the only USE for guns is to kill people, and that’s not true. And that is also ‘simply a fact’. Boru
‘I can’t be having with this.’ - Esmeralda Weatherwax
Or I could be pointing out that the injuries Martin inflicted on Zimmerman could themselves be considered self-defense. Think about it: a stranger is following you around at night and he chases you down a dark alleyway. Tell me, you're a strong believer in self-defense, does this sound like a situation where you could justifiably retaliate against someone who very likely means to do you harm? Is it legal? Do you at least see where someone who would do such a thing is coming from? Because, frankly, in this case, I can, and in the absence of evidence that he actually had any criminal intent that night, I see no reason to doubt that this could have been why he hit Zimmerman.
Martin could have swung first, but then again, Zimmerman might have just slapped him before Martin punched him, or maybe Zimmerman made a swing at him and Trayvon reacted before Zimmerman actually hit him. Only two people know what really happened: one's dead and the other's word, frankly, cannot be trusted.
Comparing the Universal Oneness of All Life to Yo Mama since 2010.
I was born with the gift of laughter and a sense the world is mad.
Rehashing events from over 12 years ago that are nowhere near similar,........... good times!
Being told you're delusional does not necessarily mean you're mental.
RE: Kenosha Shooter Kyle Rittenhouse
September 9, 2020 at 11:48 pm
(This post was last modified: September 10, 2020 at 12:00 am by The Architect Of Fate.)
(September 9, 2020 at 6:11 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote:It's a single use item by intent the mere fact you can modify something does not disprove that fact . But this seems like an impasse so i'll just agree to disagree .(September 9, 2020 at 9:45 am)SUNGULA Wrote: Guns were invented for war hunting was a later development . Handguns and Assault Rifle were designed with human targets in mind . That is simply a fact . (September 9, 2020 at 5:58 pm)Angrboda Wrote:I was responding to the charge i fell afoul of the generic fallacy . Which i pointed out simply pointing out fire arms were military in nature does not do .And the wiki article answers your statement doubting if that fact was true .(September 9, 2020 at 3:12 pm)SUNGULA Wrote: It's generic fallacy to simply point out that the original intent of fire arms was military in nature . (September 9, 2020 at 4:50 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote:What?(September 9, 2020 at 4:00 pm)SUNGULA Wrote: Stalking is wrong period (September 9, 2020 at 6:33 pm)Rev. Rye Wrote: Or I could be pointing out that the injuries Martin inflicted on Zimmerman could themselves be considered self-defense. Think about it: a stranger is following you around at night and he chases you down a dark alleyway. Tell me, you're a strong believer in self-defense, does this sound like a situation where you could justifiably retaliate against someone who very likely means to do you harm? Is it legal? Do you at least see where someone who would do such a thing is coming from? Because, frankly, in this case, I can, and in the absence of evidence that he actually had any criminal intent that night, I see no reason to doubt that this could have been why he hit Zimmerman.But Rye people are allowed to follow you around and not allowed to do anything about it , And Zimmerman could not have simply not followed him . That's asking too much .
"Change was inevitable"
Nemo sicut deus debet esse! “No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?” –SHIRLEY CHISHOLM (September 9, 2020 at 11:33 am)Nomad Wrote:Go fuck your mother.(September 6, 2020 at 10:35 pm)Irreligious Atheist Wrote: I don't know. I kind of see it like the Trayvon Martin case. Zimmerman seems to be a terrible person, and he shouldn't have been following Martin, but he broke no laws in doing so and was rightly found not guilty because it seems to have been a justifiable killing in self defense. Are you ready for the fire? We are firemen. WE ARE FIREMEN! The heat doesn’t bother us. We live in the heat. We train in the heat. It tells us that we’re ready, we’re at home, we’re where we’re supposed to be. Flames don’t intimidate us. What do we do? We control the flame. We control them. We move the flames where we want to. And then we extinguish them. Impersonation is treason. (September 9, 2020 at 11:48 pm)SUNGULA Wrote:(September 9, 2020 at 5:58 pm)Angrboda Wrote: Um, what?I was responding to the charge i fell afoul of the generic fallacy . Which i pointed out simply pointing out fire arms were military in nature does not do .And the wiki article answers your statement doubting if that fact was true . First of all, it's the 'genetic' fallacy, not the 'generic' fallacy. And second, there was no charge that you had fallen afoul of it. I asked if you could make an argument from the fact you noted without running afoul of the genetic fallacy because if you can't, then none of your conclusions from that fact are valid and any conclusions that you draw are non sequiturs. I'm not even claiming that you can't make such an argument. I simply challenged you to do so. Instead, we get this nonsense in reply from you. Is English your first language, or is there a language barrier here that I am unaware of there being? |
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)