has Biden done a good job as president?

[arewethereyet]

You have no credibility.

And you have zero argument. I do not care if I have credibility with you. It's easier to fool someone than convince them they've been fooled. Cognitive dissonance is very real and most people suffer from it, including you, big time. Just remember that this is a discussion forum. People are going to disagree with and criticize your political candidate. If you want an echo chamber, wouldn't it make more sense to go ahead and start a facebook group with your girlfriends where you can do a circle jerk?

Is it not ok with you that I brought up Biden dropping bombs? Do you support killing brown people with fire from the skies and interfering in other countries business? Is that something I wasn't supposed to talk about? Should I avoid this topic in the future or do I have your permission to bring it up? What about kids in cages? Do your delicate sensibilities allow me to bring that up, or am I going to be insulted for that too? The election is over. Take a minute to relax. Now that the election is over, it's the time for the left to really push for progressive policies and to put pressure on the administration.

You bring up things that aren't relevant...consider your marvelous input on the Chauvin thread.

You have no credibility.  What little you may have had you blew.

[Irreligious Atheist]

 Robert Redfield is a crank and loon. Just because you headed a government agency at one point doesn't make you not a nutbar. Look up his opinions on AIDs and HIV and Safe injection sites.

And arewethereyet is right you have no credibility only empty rhetoric.

Headed a government agency at one point? At one point? You mean during the pandemic that he's talking about? That's pretty relevant, and he knows plenty more than you do. He knows much of the information that you do not know, that he is surely basing his opinion off of. He had access to more information than you or I.

[The Architect Of Fate]

Or he is a crackpot who's pushing nutty conspiracy tripe and has no more information than anybody else.

[LadyForCamus]

This question asks has Biden done a good job as president in general. not compared to trump but has he made America safer? pro prosperous, has the biden admin toed the line or exceeded his promises in your opinion.. again nothing to do with trump, just trying to gauge what lefty nut bags think of:
The current situation on our southern border, IE the humanitarian crisis/kids in cages
Biden's dealings with: North Korea, China, Russia, moving to defcon 3
His bid to end America's energy surplus resulting in Higher fuel prices
His role/his expectations for the American people in the pandemic which seems backwards to how Fl/DeSantis is handling things to far greater success.
His dealings in the middle east pulling out of Afghanistan, Pandering to Pakistan to rejoin the nuclear proliferation agreement 
His proposed taxes or anything else you think he has done a good job on.

Because i honestly ask people if they think he is doing a good job, and if i get a yes they can not tell me where or what he has done a good job on unless they use trump as a red herring to deflect the question.. so again i get it orange man bad, no need to go down that road (unless too "smart" to come up with anything else, but must be heard).. but for the rest: what merits has a Biden's presidency produced?

Oh, now you care about kids in cages? Huh. Weird.

[LadyForCamus]

Is it just me, or is @Drich doing an awful lot of talking about Trump for someone who said he didn’t want this thread to be about Trump?

[Mister Agenda]

 Robert Redfield is a crank and loon. Just because you headed a government agency at one point doesn't make you not a nutbar. Look up his opinions on AIDs and HIV and Safe injection sites.

And arewethereyet is right you have no credibility only empty rhetoric.

Headed a government agency at one point? At one point? You mean during the pandemic that he's talking about? That's pretty relevant, and he knows plenty more than you do. He knows much of the information that you do not know, that he is surely basing his opinion off of. He had access to more information than you or I.

It's too bad he didn't know enough to take Covid seriously before it became widespread in the USA.

[Fireball]

 Robert Redfield is a crank and loon. Just because you headed a government agency at one point doesn't make you not a nutbar. Look up his opinions on AIDs and HIV and Safe injection sites.

And arewethereyet is right you have no credibility only empty rhetoric.

Headed a government agency at one point? At one point? You mean during the pandemic that he's talking about? That's pretty relevant, and he knows plenty more than you do. He knows much of the information that you do not know, that he is surely basing his opinion off of. He had access to more information than you or I.

Heading a government agency doesn't confer any abilities. The chump appointed people who were either unqualified or whose political leanings were antithetical to the actual mission of the agency. Energy and education spring immediately to mind.

[Drich]

https://www.cfr.org/article/funding-unit...d-programs
seems like it's a little more.. which still makes us majority share hold/the us pays more into the un than any other single country.

The article you cite states that a little less than a fifth of the U.N. budget is contributed by the U.S., which would be 20%.  Even your own source refutes you.

how much does jeff bezos own of amazon? how much of tesla does elon musk own? 70% 60? maybe 50? no Bezos owns 10% and musk owns 20% yet they have controlling interest and are incharge of the direction of those companies. why because even @ 10% bezos has the majority share. That is the parallel im trying to communicate with you people. the US is the largest donner has the most skin in the Game at the UN, as such will be taxed the hardest when ever the un moves against another country. look at history moron! durning the gulf war who was the lead representative of the collision force? who lead unforces in gulf war II? @ the same 20% mind you.

First of all, monetary funding of the U.N. isn't any kind of share as the distribution of power and votes in the various bodies of the U.N. is not based upon it.  

trump proved this wrong. when he decided to pull the us out of the un unless the other countries put in their fair share.

Second, even if it were comparable, the U.S. would NOT be a majority shareholder.

You are a fucking moron.

if i'm a moron and have been proved right.. (my article says the us is the majority share holder in the un, plus i demonstrated a majority share hold does not have to own 51% of a company) then how stupid are you? quite less than a moron huh?

---

The UN is not a private corporation. There are no "shares". 
The link says just what he said, (and I said). It says one fifth. That's a majority of nothing. 
We get you don't even know the basics of what a public company is and what shares actually are, and how Capitalism works and how NGO's work.
The members of the UN don't get more votes, depending on how much they give. The Security Council does have some "more influence", but it's not according to donations.

Obama did not roll over when they invaded Crimea, and I guess your buddy did the same for the Ukraine, except Obama put oil sanctions on Russia, (and Trump did nothing),
which was SO bad they needed to interfere with our election to try to get them (sanctions) reversed. 
https://www.businessinsider.com/trump-mo...is-2018-11

It's an analogy buckster. the un is like a corporation in the way the majority share holder has control over policy. trump proved this when he threaten to leave the un.

yes obama did roll over like a limp noodle.. and the ukraine was not under threat till recently/biden rule. the only news between russia ukrain and trump durning his administration was the accusation that sparked his first impeachment proceedings, and ofcourse the joe biden pay to play/extortion of a billion dollar aid package being with held till the prosecutor investigating his son hunter was fired.

[Nay_Sayer]

That was more of a knock on the relationship between the press and the administration than Hunter. Home made cookies handed out to the press, the people who are supposed to be holding the power structure to account, baked lovingly by Jen Psaki's mother in law. I wonder if that will make it more or less likely that they ask her hard questions?

I only brought up the Hunter story to show what a shit show MSM is. They buried the Hunter story. The CEO of Twitter admits it was a major error for twitter to suppress it, and more sensible media like The Hill, Secular Talk with Kyle Kulinski, and others all agreed that the emails are clearly real. The media tried to bury the corruption story, and instead are now running stories about him going into a bakery to buy bagels. If anyone tries to defend stories about Hunter buying bagels while MSM ignores the real story, you and the MSM deserve each other.

I agree. Hunter Biden has been awful as president and as a politician in general.  Do you think they can impeach Hunter?

*receives AF fax* Seems he is neither of those things, However, the previous goof did have a mail order bride who did porn.

[Drich]

Please post the evidence of Hunter Biden's corruption.
They may go back to Afghanistan, they may not. There was no reason to go there in the first place.
Bin Laden cooking up a plan in a remote cave is no reason to invade a country.
It was nothing but "the appearance of some sort of revenge" for 9-11,
(which Bush was told was coming that summer at least twice, and failed to protect us from).

https://nypost.com/2020/10/24/biden-corr...er-emails/
https://freedomwire.com/hunter-biden-cor...-evidence/
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/202...ntelligen/
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/...-fake-data
https://nypost.com/2020/10/21/hunter-bid...be-report/
https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politics/ma...s-n1065806

is that enough or is your propaganda fuel delusion over take any honest scrutiny you once had?

---

This question asks has Biden done a good job as president in general. not compared to trump but has he made America safer? pro prosperous, has the biden admin toed the line or exceeded his promises in your opinion.. again nothing to do with trump, just trying to gauge what lefty nut bags think of:
The current situation on our southern border, IE the humanitarian crisis/kids in cages
Biden's dealings with: North Korea, China, Russia, moving to defcon 3
His bid to end America's energy surplus resulting in Higher fuel prices
His role/his expectations for the American people in the pandemic which seems backwards to how Fl/DeSantis is handling things to far greater success.
His dealings in the middle east pulling out of Afghanistan, Pandering to Pakistan to rejoin the nuclear proliferation agreement 
His proposed taxes or anything else you think he has done a good job on.

Because i honestly ask people if they think he is doing a good job, and if i get a yes they can not tell me where or what he has done a good job on unless they use trump as a red herring to deflect the question.. so again i get it orange man bad, no need to go down that road (unless too "smart" to come up with anything else, but must be heard).. but for the rest: what merits has a Biden's presidency produced?

Oh, now you care about kids in cages? Huh. Weird.

it's always been a concern as obama started the policy, trump all but eliminated it and biden doubled it.