has Biden done a good job as president?

[Irreligious Atheist]

That was more of a knock on the relationship between the press and the administration than Hunter. Home made cookies handed out to the press, the people who are supposed to be holding the power structure to account, baked lovingly by Jen Psaki's mother in law. I wonder if that will make it more or less likely that they ask her hard questions?

I only brought up the Hunter story to show what a shit show MSM is. They buried the Hunter story. The CEO of Twitter admits it was a major error for twitter to suppress it, and more sensible media like The Hill, Secular Talk with Kyle Kulinski, and others all agreed that the emails are clearly real. The media tried to bury the corruption story, and instead are now running stories about him going into a bakery to buy bagels. If anyone tries to defend stories about Hunter buying bagels while MSM ignores the real story, you and the MSM deserve each other.

I agree. Hunter Biden has been awful as president and as a politician in general.  Do you think they can impeach Hunter?

*receives AF fax* Seems he is neither of those things, However, the previous goof did have a mail order bride who did porn.

Way to let my actual point go right over your head. MSM is state tv, just like Fox was for Trump for a while. What story would you choose to run if you ran the news and wanted to give the people relevant information? Hunter buys bagels from a bakery, which I know, is a huge story and needs to be covered to some extent obviously. Bagels are pretty tasty and you can never get enough bagel news. Or would you cover the story about the emails? I highly doubt you had a problem with the media covering corruption from Ivanka and Don Jr, but in this specific instance you think the media should stay away from the story, and you don't like when I criticize the media for covering up the truth. Do you not think it should be the media's job to tell the truth? I know the media is owned by a handful of corporations who hire talking heads to spread propaganda and disinformation that will benefit them and their selected politicians, but in an ideal world, wouldn't you want the media to always tell the truth as best as possible?

My original post in this thread was actually the most complimentary I've been of Joe Biden while on this forum. If this is the response I get from complimenting Biden, what's the response going to be when I actually criticize the man? Yeesh.

[Bucky Ball]

Drich
bla bla bla
Trump is my Jebus, bla bla bla

You seem to have forgotten the part where the UN actually laughed at Trump. I seem to recall Nicki Haley resigning her post. Yeah ... great success there.
Your analogy is false. Policy at the UN is developed and VOTED on, and each member has ONE vote. It has NOTHING to do with how much they give. 
The perfect example of this is the profound effect that Israel has had on the UN. When (and if) you go to school, you will learn about how it works. 
BTW, when you get around to actually getting an education, you will (maybe) learn to use a grammar checker, (which is clearly beyond your capacity at this point). 
"UN" is capitalized, and it's not "threaten", it's "threatened". You are in no position to tell anyone here, .. anything. 
You are probably the most ignorant and disrepected poster on this forum. You best stick to making your monotone YouTubes.

Nothing you posted has any actual EVIDENCE concerning Hunter Biden.
It's speculation by right-wing nut-jobs, not unlike yourself.
Was he running for president ?
No.
If there actually were to be any evidence, the Trump Justice Department would have brought a case. They didn't.

Is there evidence that Guiliani while working for Trump was engaging in criminal activity ?
There is. And he will get prosecuted for it.

[The Grand Nudger]

Way to let my actual point go right over your head. MSM is state tv, just like Fox was for Trump for a while. 

It isn't, but I'm sure they'd love for it to be.  This is an example of something that you think would be bad...and would be, if it were true - but isn't, so you're just another right wing loon.  Listening to the shit that lunatics say, and routinely believing it to be true.

You'll be fine.  

[Angrboda]

The article you cite states that a little less than a fifth of the U.N. budget is contributed by the U.S., which would be 20%.  Even your own source refutes you.

how much does jeff bezos own of amazon? how much of tesla does elon musk own? 70% 60? maybe 50? no Bezos owns 10% and musk owns 20% yet they have controlling interest and are incharge of the direction of those companies. why because even @ 10% bezos has the majority share. That is the parallel im trying to communicate with you people. the US is the largest donner has the most skin in the Game at the UN, as such will be taxed the hardest when ever the un moves against another country. look at history moron! durning the gulf war who was the lead representative of the collision force? who lead unforces in gulf war II? @ the same 20% mind you.

That doesn't have anything to do with what I said. You cited an article that refuted your statement that it was a little more than the 22% that Boru said it was, when your own article said that it was a little less than 20%. The rest of what you wrote has dick to do with whether you were right about the figure being more than 22%. You're just babbling a bunch of irrelevant crap.

First of all, monetary funding of the U.N. isn't any kind of share as the distribution of power and votes in the various bodies of the U.N. is not based upon it.  

trump proved this wrong. when he decided to pull the us out of the un unless the other countries put in their fair share.

Um, no he didn't. I think you've got the U.N. confused with NATO, as well as a Trumpian misunderstanding of NATO. Regardless, this is just bullshit. It wouldn"t prove what you say even if it were true.

Second, even if it were comparable, the U.S. would NOT be a majority shareholder.

You are a fucking moron.

if i'm a moron and have been proved right.. (my article says the us is the majority share holder in the un, plus i demonstrated a majority share hold does not have to own 51% of a company) then how stupid are you? quite less than a moron huh?

Neither the word 'majority' nor the word 'shareholder' appear in your article. Nowhere does the article say anything close to that. So you're wrong as usual. And nowhere have you demonstrated any contrary fact about what majority shareholding means. It simply doesn't mean what you want it to mean.

So, no, you're wrong, again. And delusional. And likely hallucinating. And a fucking moron.

[arewethereyet]

Way to let my actual point go right over your head. MSM is state tv, just like Fox was for Trump for a while. 

It isn't, but I'm sure they'd love for it to be.  This is an example of something that you think would be bad...and would be, if it were true - but isn't, so you're just another right wing loon.  Listening to the shit that lunatics say, and routinely believing it to be true.

You'll be fine.  

Fixed that for ya.

[The Grand Nudger]

Yeah, I know he won't be fine - but he's sure he will. TBT, fox was never state tv either. It was fascist oligarchy tv. It only seemed like state tv because a fascist oligarch bought the republican party wholesale.

It would be nice if Biden were the leftist antifa supersoldier right wing nutjobs like IA think he is. Sadly, he's not. We're back to normal bad - where we implore each other to choose between right wing corporatism and full blown for-profit autocracy.

[Irreligious Atheist]

Way to let my actual point go right over your head. MSM is state tv, just like Fox was for Trump for a while. 

It isn't, but I'm sure they'd love for it to be.  This is an example of something that you think would be bad...and would be, if it were true - but isn't, so you're just another right wing loon.  Listening to the shit that lunatics say, and routinely believing it to be true.

You'll be fine.  

Yes, lunatics, AKA most of progressive alt media online agree that MSM exists to push misinformation and propaganda. Don Lemon-head admitted it on air when he said CNN has done everything in its' power to get Trump out of office. Bernie Sanders is sexist. Yeah, it was an honest mistake the media made and they were not just pushing propaganda because this is a man that cares about poor people. A man who wants a national healthcare system and other progressive policies. The MSM didn't attack Bernie because he wasn't an establishment dem and because their job is to bury real progressives. Just a coincidence. The MSM isn't attacking Andrew Yang right now as a sexist who white supremacists love because Yang is a good guy who wants to give people 1000 dollars a month and wants more progressive policies. It's all just a coincidence, and it is an honest mix-up. They honestly believe Yang believes beating up women is funny and they honestly think he's an Asian white supremacist. The same with Tulsi Gabbard. The media didn't tie her to white supremacy and being a puppet of Assad because she's against some of the wars and the media can't get enough of brown children being murdered by the US military. No, it was just an honest mistake on the media's part.

The MSM does lightly criticize Biden from time to time, but that's to keep up the illusion that they are not state tv. That's even better than proper state tv, because you have the government propaganda being pushed out with many not even realizing that they are being fed government talking points.

---

Yeah, I know he won't be fine - but he's sure he will.  TBT, fox was never state tv either.  It was fascist oligarchy tv.  It only seemed like state tv because a fascist oligarch bought the republican party wholesale.  

It would be nice if  Biden were the leftist antifa supersoldier right wing nutjobs like IA think he is.   Sadly, he's not.  We're back to normal bad - where we implore each other to choose between right wing corporatism and full blown for-profit autocracy.

Biden is a conservative Repuiblican, as was Obama. Don't think I've ever called Biden a leftist, but he is the most progressive president to date, for what it's worth, but that's not saying much.

[The Grand Nudger]

Seems like you might be forgetting a few presidents when you say that, but you be you. We've gone from the notion that media is a conspiracy, to the notion that biden is super progressive.

I think it would be easier for you to list off the crazy shit you don't believe. Shorter list.

[Rev. Rye]

Biden is a conservative Repuiblican, as was Obama. Don't think I've ever called Biden a leftist, but he is the most progressive president to date, for what it's worth, but that's not saying much.

Conservative I can understand, particularly since it looks like the consensus among establishment politicians, Republican and Democrat, are still pretty far to the right of many Democrats, but calling him a Republican? That’s just strange. Especially now that the Republican Party is moving further and further to the right.

[The Architect Of Fate]

Biden is a conservative Repuiblican, as was Obama. Don't think I've ever called Biden a leftist, but he is the most progressive president to date, for what it's worth, but that's not saying much.

Conservative I can understand, particularly since it looks like the consensus among establishment politicians, Republican and Democrat, are still pretty far to the right of many Democrats, but calling him a Republican? That’s just strange. Especially now that the Republican Party is moving further and further to the right.

Bidens A Neoliberal