Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: March 29, 2024, 10:20 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
A Case for Inherent Morality
#1
A Case for Inherent Morality
I think that morality is inherent for the simple reason that I believe it became inborn through the process of natural selection. That is, I believe there was a time when morality was not particularly inherent. However, I believe that at that time those who preferred to be good were better equipped to survive. That is, I believe that they were  better able to work together to care for their young and each other, to hunt and gather, to build and manufacture, and to defend themselves. I believe that this lead to them becoming more numerous and prosperous than those who did not prefer to be good and that they eventually eliminated in self-defense a great many of those who did not prefer to be good. I believe that over time, as the good parented the overwhelming majority of children they passed on to them the genes that made them prefer to be good in the first place. I believe that this resulted in the vast majority of people today having an inborn feeling that it is right to be good and wrong to be bad.
Reply
#2
RE: A Case for Inherent Morality
I think that it's hard to base ideas about permanent and inseparable things in population genetics. They change.
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!
Reply
#3
RE: A Case for Inherent Morality
(June 19, 2021 at 4:33 pm)JohnJubinsky Wrote: I think that morality is inherent for the simple reason that I believe it became inborn through the process of natural selection. That is, I believe there was a time when morality was not particularly inherent. However, I believe that at that time those who preferred to be good were better equipped to survive. That is, I believe that they were  better able to work together to care for their young and each other, to hunt and gather, to build and manufacture, and to defend themselves. I believe that this lead to them becoming more numerous and prosperous than those who did not prefer to be good and that they eventually eliminated in self-defense a great many of those who did not prefer to be good. I believe that over time, as the good parented the overwhelming majority of children they passed on to them the genes that made them prefer to be good in the first place. I believe that this resulted in the vast majority of people today having an inborn feeling that it is right to be good and wrong to be bad.

It’s possible, I suppose. But it’s equally likely that it’s more of a social construct than a genetic one. In other words, those qualities you mention (cooperation, defense of the group, etc) have been found to be so useful to society, that they are inculcated rather than genetically inherited. This would explain why parents expend so much effort on teaching their children to be ‘good’.

Boru
‘But it does me no injury for my neighbour to say there are twenty gods or no gods. It neither picks my pocket nor breaks my leg.’ - Thomas Jefferson
Reply
#4
RE: A Case for Inherent Morality
(June 19, 2021 at 5:13 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote:
(June 19, 2021 at 4:33 pm)JohnJubinsky Wrote: I think that morality is inherent for the simple reason that I believe it became inborn through the process of natural selection. That is, I believe there was a time when morality was not particularly inherent. However, I believe that at that time those who preferred to be good were better equipped to survive. That is, I believe that they were  better able to work together to care for their young and each other, to hunt and gather, to build and manufacture, and to defend themselves. I believe that this lead to them becoming more numerous and prosperous than those who did not prefer to be good and that they eventually eliminated in self-defense a great many of those who did not prefer to be good. I believe that over time, as the good parented the overwhelming majority of children they passed on to them the genes that made them prefer to be good in the first place. I believe that this resulted in the vast majority of people today having an inborn feeling that it is right to be good and wrong to be bad.

It’s possible, I suppose. But it’s equally likely that it’s more of a social construct than a genetic one. In other words, those qualities you mention (cooperation, defense of the group, etc) have been found to be so useful to society, that they are inculcated rather than genetically inherited. This would explain why parents expend so much effort on teaching their children to be ‘good’.

Boru

Certainly people are also taught to be good but my experience has been that young children are happy innocent things. There is no doubt that they are broadly viewed this way by society.
Reply
#5
RE: A Case for Inherent Morality
I disagree with the term. If a human child is raised in isolation (eg. wild child) will it display or behave with inherent morality? History says no. Morals are the product of environment more than genetics.
I don't have an anger problem, I have an idiot problem.
Reply
#6
RE: A Case for Inherent Morality
(June 19, 2021 at 6:20 pm)JohnJubinsky Wrote: Certainly people are also taught to be good but my experience has been that young children are happy innocent things. There is no doubt that they are broadly viewed this way by society.

Have you ever read about Noam Chomsky's views on language acquisition? 

His studies show that newborn children have no language, but they have a strong active tendency to pick up a language. There is a kind of space or structure in the mind which is there for language, and it gets filled up fast. After a short time if they don't have a language it would be some kind of disability. 

My suspicion is that morality works the same way. It is natural to be born without morality, but it is unnatural to stay without one for very long. And as with language, the morality you pick up is the one you see around you as a little kid.
Reply
#7
RE: A Case for Inherent Morality
(June 19, 2021 at 6:20 pm)JohnJubinsky Wrote:
(June 19, 2021 at 5:13 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: It’s possible, I suppose. But it’s equally likely that it’s more of a social construct than a genetic one. In other words, those qualities you mention (cooperation, defense of the group, etc) have been found to be so useful to society, that they are inculcated rather than genetically inherited. This would explain why parents expend so much effort on teaching their children to be ‘good’.

Boru

Certainly people are also taught to be good but my experience has been that young children are happy innocent things. There is no doubt that they are broadly viewed this way by society.

Children may very well be ‘happy innocent things’, but there is - as yet - no way to tell if this happy innocence is learned or inherited.

Boru
‘But it does me no injury for my neighbour to say there are twenty gods or no gods. It neither picks my pocket nor breaks my leg.’ - Thomas Jefferson
Reply
#8
RE: A Case for Inherent Morality
Morality?  What's that?
Reply
#9
RE: A Case for Inherent Morality
(June 19, 2021 at 7:28 pm)Ranjr Wrote: Morality?  What's that?

It’s like pornography - difficult to define, but you know it when you see it.

Boru
‘But it does me no injury for my neighbour to say there are twenty gods or no gods. It neither picks my pocket nor breaks my leg.’ - Thomas Jefferson
Reply
#10
RE: A Case for Inherent Morality
Oh, I get it.  It's when the waitress knows from the way I look at her not to flirt with me.  Flirt with my wife.  I love morality.
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Morality Kingpin 101 5275 May 31, 2023 at 6:48 am
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  Morality without God Superjock 102 8593 June 17, 2021 at 6:10 pm
Last Post: Ranjr
  Cold-Case Christianity LadyForCamus 32 4341 May 24, 2019 at 7:52 pm
Last Post: Jehanne
  Morality Agnostico 337 34596 January 30, 2019 at 6:00 pm
Last Post: vulcanlogician
  Developing systems of morality, outside of religious influence. Kookaburra 28 4073 March 20, 2018 at 1:27 am
Last Post: haig
  Atheism: The Case Against God by George H. Smith Alexmahone 10 1740 March 4, 2018 at 6:52 am
Last Post: robvalue
  Objective morality as a proper basic belief Little Henry 609 157574 July 29, 2017 at 1:02 am
Last Post: Astonished
  The curious case of Sarah Salviander. Jehanne 24 6139 December 27, 2016 at 4:12 pm
Last Post: Jehanne
Video The Married Atheist vid: Morality from science? robvalue 5 2015 March 19, 2016 at 2:57 pm
Last Post: brewer
  The Case for Atheism Drew_2013 410 205444 March 17, 2016 at 12:46 pm
Last Post: Whateverist



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)