Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: April 24, 2024, 6:18 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 4 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
[Serious] PSA: Rape Apologetics
RE: PSA: Rape Apologetics
(July 21, 2021 at 4:50 pm)John 6IX Breezy Wrote:
(July 21, 2021 at 4:48 pm)LadyForCamus Wrote: And, nothing you’ve said has been actioned upon by moderators, has it? So quit whining.

See the following thread:

https://atheistforums.org/thread-62751.html

Here is where I was called a rape apologist and banned:

https://atheistforums.org/thread-62746-p...pid2037503

Here is where Belacqua was called a rape apologist:

https://atheistforums.org/thread-62746-p...pid2037537

I will say this: I wasn’t involved in that decision, and I don’t personally believe the discussion in question represents rape apologism; but rather a philosophical discussion regarding what constitutes violence. You and Bel were both very clear about the fact that rape is rape. That being said, keep it in mind that we’re a team of staff and we’re all trying to do what we think is best for the forum and its participating members.
Nay_Sayer: “Nothing is impossible if you dream big enough, or in this case, nothing is impossible if you use a barrel of KY Jelly and a miniature horse.”

Wiser words were never spoken. 
Reply
RE: PSA: Rape Apologetics
(July 21, 2021 at 6:46 pm)LadyForCamus Wrote: That being said, keep it in mind that we’re a team of staff and we’re all trying to do what we think is best for the forum and its participating members.

That's very reasonable; I won't push the point any further. Thank you.
Reply
RE: PSA: Rape Apologetics
Quote:Thoughts are immune to your approval. If you think an idea is wrong argue against it; your moral appraisal is not an argument.
Thoughts are not immune from approval and it requires no argument. People are allowed to judge other peoples thoughts and condemn those thoughts

Quote:Yeah. I think Breezy has a point here. "Rape isn't always violent." -- with no context could certainly be considered an apologist statement. But the way Breezy said it, it was not. He was talking about non-violent forms of coercion that are deemed rape by certain feminists. He was taken out of context.

Same thing with Belacqua. What Bel basically said was "statutory rape is rape, even when no violence is involved."
Rape is by default a violent act
"Change was inevitable"


Nemo sicut deus debet esse!

[Image: Canada_Flag.jpg?v=1646203843]



 “No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM


      
Reply
RE: PSA: Rape Apologetics
(July 21, 2021 at 7:44 pm)Helios Wrote: Rape is by default a violent act
Please define violent within this context, particularly considering that one may have renered his victims entirely defenseless before comitting that crime.
Cetero censeo religionem delendam esse
Reply
RE: PSA: Rape Apologetics
(July 13, 2021 at 7:01 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: As many of you know by now, Drich has been permanently and forevermore banned.
Holy shit I'm surprised he made it this long to be perfectly honest.
He who loves God cannot endeavour that God should love him in return - Baruch Spinoza
Reply
RE: PSA: Rape Apologetics
(July 22, 2021 at 5:06 am)Mudhammam Wrote:
(July 13, 2021 at 7:01 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: As many of you know by now, Drich has been permanently and forevermore banned.
Holy shit I'm surprised he made it this long to be perfectly honest.

Yeah, that happened. And we all let it happen. SO sorry for the delay.

Boru
‘But it does me no injury for my neighbour to say there are twenty gods or no gods. It neither picks my pocket nor breaks my leg.’ - Thomas Jefferson
Reply
RE: PSA: Rape Apologetics
(July 22, 2021 at 2:06 am)Deesse23 Wrote:
(July 21, 2021 at 7:44 pm)Helios Wrote: Rape is by default a violent act
Please define violent within this context, particularly considering that one may have renered his victims entirely defenseless before comitting that crime.
Violence in this context is an act of violation of one's body or some other element of personnel autonomy for the purpose of sexual gratification or sex-based power.
"Change was inevitable"


Nemo sicut deus debet esse!

[Image: Canada_Flag.jpg?v=1646203843]



 “No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM


      
Reply
RE: PSA: Rape Apologetics
(July 22, 2021 at 6:36 am)Helios Wrote:
(July 22, 2021 at 2:06 am)Deesse23 Wrote: Please define violent within this context, particularly considering that one may have renered his victims entirely defenseless before comitting that crime.
Violence in this context is an act of violation of one's body or some other element of personnel autonomy for the purpose of sexual gratification or sex-based power.
I wouldnt necessarily agree with your usage of that word, but
#1 I am no native english speaker
#2 Your statements make sense to me (= i agree), given the usage of "violent" you are applying.
Cetero censeo religionem delendam esse
Reply
RE: PSA: Rape Apologetics
Drich victim-blamed Judy when she opened up about her rape. This doesn't surprise me at all. It's a shame more action wasn't taken then, when an actual member of ours was being attacked that way.

Reply
RE: PSA: Rape Apologetics
(July 23, 2021 at 9:09 am)Thumpalumpacus Wrote: Drich victim-blamed Judy when she opened up about her rape. This doesn't surprise me at all. It's a shame more action wasn't taken then, when an actual member of ours was being attacked that way.

Nice to see you, Thump! I hope you stick around. ❤️
Nay_Sayer: “Nothing is impossible if you dream big enough, or in this case, nothing is impossible if you use a barrel of KY Jelly and a miniature horse.”

Wiser words were never spoken. 
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  PSA: NSFW tags Nay_Sayer 14 823 March 2, 2024 at 2:09 pm
Last Post: GUBU
  PSA: Hate Speech, rule 7 arewethereyet 24 2476 September 21, 2023 at 7:14 pm
Last Post: Thumpalumpacus
  PSA: PLEASE READ BrianSoddingBoru4 117 10384 June 28, 2023 at 7:59 am
Last Post: brewer
  PSA: Update to necroposting rule arewethereyet 51 6542 April 3, 2023 at 2:33 am
Last Post: Goosebump
  PSA: Added to threats rule arewethereyet 8 2822 May 19, 2022 at 12:42 pm
Last Post: Angrboda
  PSA: Post time limits arewethereyet 6 2262 April 22, 2022 at 6:43 pm
Last Post: Foxaèr
  PSA: The Necroposting Rule BrianSoddingBoru4 42 6569 April 6, 2022 at 3:03 pm
Last Post: brewer
  PSA - Clarification of rule #3 on doxxing. arewethereyet 18 3688 November 17, 2021 at 5:11 am
Last Post: BrianSoddingBoru4
  PSA: The Spam Filter BrianSoddingBoru4 2 1643 June 3, 2021 at 8:56 am
Last Post: brewer
  [Serious] PSA: Language BrianSoddingBoru4 28 5122 January 3, 2021 at 9:10 am
Last Post: Gawdzilla Sama



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)