Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: December 13, 2024, 1:39 pm

Poll: Is zero a natural number?
This poll is closed.
Yes
30.00%
3 30.00%
No
70.00%
7 70.00%
Total 10 vote(s) 100%
* You voted for this item. [Show Results]

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Is zero a natural number?
#21
RE: Is zero a natural number?
(January 18, 2022 at 8:12 pm)polymath257 Wrote:
(January 18, 2022 at 5:45 pm)brewer Wrote: If zero is not 'natural', where does than leave negative numbers?

Yeah Poly, I'm looking to you to hurt my math brain again.

The usual progression is something like this:

1. Natural numbers: 0,1,2,3,4,....

2. Integers: Either a natural number or the negative of a natural number, so ..,-3, -2, -1, 0, 1, 2, 3,...

3. Rational numbers: Fractions, one integer divided by a non-zero integer. 2/3, -5/8, 13/2, 4=4/1, -123/43,....

4. Real numbers: intuitively, numbers with (possibly infinite) decimal expansions. pi, e, sqrt(2), ....

5. Complex numbers. If i is the square root of -1, then a complex number is one of the form a+bi where a and b are real numbers.

These are the basic number systems, but there are a host of others.

Algebraic numbers: those that are roots of some polynomial with integer coefficients. sqrt(2) is algebraic. so is sqrt(2)+cbrt(5).

Gaussian integers: those complex numbers a+bi where a and b are integers. these have many properties in common with the integers.

These are the usual algebraic number systems.

But we can go in a different direction. All natural numbers are also 'cardinal numbers': these count the 'number of things' in sets. The natural numbers are, specifically, the
*finite* cardinal numbers.

But there are infinite cardinal numbers as well. These are studied in set theory and usually not as algebraic structures because they lack many of the 'nice' properties of the other systems above. if you are trying to say infinity is a number, this is what you are probably talking about.

Ordinal numbers: instead of the 'size' of a set, we put an 'order structure' on the set and compare different order structures. Usually, we do this with order structures that are 'nice' in the sense of being 'well-ordered' (a technical term that I can go into if anyone wants). The natural numbers are, again, the finite ordinal numbers. But ordinal numbers have a much more complex structure than cardinal numbers do. They also fail to obey certain fairly natural algebraic properties, so are usually studied by set theorists as well.

In standard set theory, following Von Neumann, every cardinal number is an ordinal number, but not vice versa.

Ouch, ouch, ouch, my late high school-early undergrad brain hurts. I expect a delivery of fentanyl and midazolam. Not propofol, no Jackson for me.

Just for fun, does negative or positive ever apply to zero?
Being told you're delusional does not necessarily mean you're mental. 
Reply
#22
RE: Is zero a natural number?
I wonder...the proposition "Out of nothing, nothing comes," seems self-evident and serves as a foundation level defeater in ontology. That would seem to have some bearing on whether it is real or natural. And what's natural about numbers? According to some, numbers, like all mathematical objects, are artifices that sometimes inexplicably align consistently with observed phenomena. Such as those would by definition not be natural, but artificial.
<insert profound quote here>
Reply
#23
RE: Is zero a natural number?
(January 18, 2022 at 9:17 pm)brewer Wrote:
(January 18, 2022 at 8:12 pm)polymath257 Wrote: The usual progression is something like this:

1. Natural numbers: 0,1,2,3,4,....

2. Integers: Either a natural number or the negative of a natural number, so ..,-3, -2, -1, 0, 1, 2, 3,...

3. Rational numbers: Fractions, one integer divided by a non-zero integer. 2/3, -5/8, 13/2, 4=4/1, -123/43,....

4. Real numbers: intuitively, numbers with (possibly infinite) decimal expansions. pi, e, sqrt(2), ....

5. Complex numbers. If i is the square root of -1, then a complex number is one of the form a+bi where a and b are real numbers.

These are the basic number systems, but there are a host of others.

Algebraic numbers: those that are roots of some polynomial with integer coefficients. sqrt(2) is algebraic. so is sqrt(2)+cbrt(5).

Gaussian integers: those complex numbers a+bi where a and b are integers. these have many properties in common with the integers.

These are the usual algebraic number systems.

But we can go in a different direction. All natural numbers are also 'cardinal numbers': these count the 'number of things' in sets. The natural numbers are, specifically, the
*finite* cardinal numbers.

But there are infinite cardinal numbers as well. These are studied in set theory and usually not as algebraic structures because they lack many of the 'nice' properties of the other systems above. if you are trying to say infinity is a number, this is what you are probably talking about.

Ordinal numbers: instead of the 'size' of a set, we put an 'order structure' on the set and compare different order structures. Usually, we do this with order structures that are 'nice' in the sense of being 'well-ordered' (a technical term that I can go into if anyone wants). The natural numbers are, again, the finite ordinal numbers. But ordinal numbers have a much more complex structure than cardinal numbers do. They also fail to obey certain fairly natural algebraic properties, so are usually studied by set theorists as well.

In standard set theory, following Von Neumann, every cardinal number is an ordinal number, but not vice versa.

Ouch, ouch, ouch, my late high school-early undergrad brain hurts. I expect a delivery of fentanyl and midazolam. Not propofol, no Jackson for me.

Just for fun, does negative or positive ever apply to zero?

Ooh, ooh, I know this one! NO.
If you get to thinking you’re a person of some influence, try ordering somebody else’s dog around.
Reply
#24
RE: Is zero a natural number?
(January 18, 2022 at 9:34 pm)Neo-Scholastic Wrote: I wonder...the proposition "Out of nothing, nothing comes," seems self-evident and serves as a foundation level defeater in ontology. That would seem to have some bearing on whether it is real or natural. And what's natural about numbers? According to some, numbers, like all mathematical objects, are artifices that sometimes inexplicably align consistently with observed phenomena. Such as those would by definition not be natural, but artificial.

What's the alternative? That the laws of nature not be describable by some mathematical models? The term for such a world would be "magic".

As for "nothing" no one has, to my satisfaction, ever provided any physical description of that. To use "nothing" in a sentence is to give it meaning, if only as an abstraction. One might as well ask what color Saturday is.
Reply
#25
RE: Is zero a natural number?
(January 18, 2022 at 9:17 pm)brewer Wrote: Ouch, ouch, ouch, my late high school-early undergrad brain hurts. I expect a delivery of fentanyl and midazolam. Not propofol, no Jackson for me.

Just for fun, does negative or positive ever apply to zero?

Depends a bit on the book used.  One way of resolving ambiguities is as follows:

Positive: >0
Negative: <0
Non-negative: >=0
Non-positive: <=0

So, 0 is not negative, not positive, but is non-negative and non-positive.
Reply
#26
RE: Is zero a natural number?
(January 18, 2022 at 9:55 pm)Jehanne Wrote:
(January 18, 2022 at 9:34 pm)Neo-Scholastic Wrote: I wonder...the proposition "Out of nothing, nothing comes," seems self-evident and serves as a foundation level defeater in ontology. That would seem to have some bearing on whether it is real or natural. And what's natural about numbers? According to some, numbers, like all mathematical objects, are artifices that sometimes inexplicably align consistently with observed phenomena. Such as those would by definition not be natural, but artificial.

What's the alternative? That the laws of nature not be describable by some mathematical models? The term for such a world would be "magic".

As for "nothing" no one has, to my satisfaction, ever provided any physical description of that. To use "nothing" in a sentence is to give it meaning, if only as an abstraction. One might as well ask what color Saturday is.

Well...it seems to me that nothingness literally means an absence of physicality.
<insert profound quote here>
Reply
#27
RE: Is zero a natural number?
Quote:Well...it seems to me that nothingness literally means an absence of physicality.
Nope  Dodgy
"Change was inevitable"


Nemo sicut deus debet esse!

[Image: Canada_Flag.jpg?v=1646203843]



 “No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM


      
Reply
#28
RE: Is zero a natural number?
(January 18, 2022 at 9:17 pm)brewer Wrote:
(January 18, 2022 at 8:12 pm)polymath257 Wrote: The usual progression is something like this:

1. Natural numbers: 0,1,2,3,4,....

2. Integers: Either a natural number or the negative of a natural number, so ..,-3, -2, -1, 0, 1, 2, 3,...

3. Rational numbers: Fractions, one integer divided by a non-zero integer. 2/3, -5/8, 13/2, 4=4/1, -123/43,....

4. Real numbers: intuitively, numbers with (possibly infinite) decimal expansions. pi, e, sqrt(2), ....

5. Complex numbers. If i is the square root of -1, then a complex number is one of the form a+bi where a and b are real numbers.

These are the basic number systems, but there are a host of others.

Algebraic numbers: those that are roots of some polynomial with integer coefficients. sqrt(2) is algebraic. so is sqrt(2)+cbrt(5).

Gaussian integers: those complex numbers a+bi where a and b are integers. these have many properties in common with the integers.

These are the usual algebraic number systems.

But we can go in a different direction. All natural numbers are also 'cardinal numbers': these count the 'number of things' in sets. The natural numbers are, specifically, the
*finite* cardinal numbers.

But there are infinite cardinal numbers as well. These are studied in set theory and usually not as algebraic structures because they lack many of the 'nice' properties of the other systems above. if you are trying to say infinity is a number, this is what you are probably talking about.

Ordinal numbers: instead of the 'size' of a set, we put an 'order structure' on the set and compare different order structures. Usually, we do this with order structures that are 'nice' in the sense of being 'well-ordered' (a technical term that I can go into if anyone wants). The natural numbers are, again, the finite ordinal numbers. But ordinal numbers have a much more complex structure than cardinal numbers do. They also fail to obey certain fairly natural algebraic properties, so are usually studied by set theorists as well.

In standard set theory, following Von Neumann, every cardinal number is an ordinal number, but not vice versa.

Ouch, ouch, ouch, my late high school-early undergrad brain hurts. I expect a delivery of fentanyl and midazolam. Not propofol, no Jackson for me.

Just for fun, does negative or positive ever apply to zero?

In computer science, yes.
Reply
#29
RE: Is zero a natural number?
(January 18, 2022 at 10:56 pm)Neo-Scholastic Wrote:
(January 18, 2022 at 9:55 pm)Jehanne Wrote: What's the alternative? That the laws of nature not be describable by some mathematical models? The term for such a world would be "magic".

As for "nothing" no one has, to my satisfaction, ever provided any physical description of that. To use "nothing" in a sentence is to give it meaning, if only as an abstraction. One might as well ask what color Saturday is.

Well...it seems to me that nothingness literally means an absence of physicality.

You're defining it in terms of what it is not as opposed to what it is, even if such is only as a concept.
Reply
#30
RE: Is zero a natural number?
Really, we're going to have a debate over nothing? No thanks.
<insert profound quote here>
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Euclid proved that there are an infinite number of prime numbers. Jehanne 7 1165 March 14, 2021 at 8:26 am
Last Post: Gawdzilla Sama
  Graham's Number GrandizerII 15 2422 February 18, 2018 at 4:58 pm
Last Post: GrandizerII
  This number is illegal in the USA Aractus 13 5063 May 7, 2016 at 10:51 pm
Last Post: J a c k
  The Magical Number 9 Rhondazvous 25 5709 December 30, 2015 at 4:47 pm
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  Tricky Number Sequence Puzzle GrandizerII 16 6461 January 20, 2015 at 2:35 am
Last Post: Whateverist
Question Dividing by zero Tea Earl Grey Hot 77 24251 January 18, 2015 at 12:31 am
Last Post: GrandizerII
  What is Zero (0)? ManMachine 22 8225 February 9, 2014 at 11:11 am
Last Post: truthBtold
  Number crunching curios pocaracas 24 10012 January 4, 2014 at 2:14 am
Last Post: Belac Enrobso
  If 0.999(etc) = 1, does 1 - 0.999 go to zero? Euler 26 10043 April 30, 2013 at 12:17 pm
Last Post: Mister Agenda
  The nature of number jonb 82 42468 October 28, 2012 at 11:02 pm
Last Post: jonb



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)