Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: April 27, 2024, 7:18 am

Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 4 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
AD v. AF
#21
RE: AD v. AF
(October 19, 2022 at 6:42 am)Jehanne Wrote:
(October 19, 2022 at 2:44 am)Deesse23 Wrote: This place has an islamist and several trolls who have not been banned.

I'm glad that they've not been banned.  They are living examples of what's wrong with religious thinking.  I read that at the Guantanamo Bay prison the US guards were teaching the prisoners mathematics; it is clear that there is a reason for that.

I didnt say religious trolls . Naughty  For one, i am pretty confident he is just shitposting and being disruptive for the sake of it. He isnt even hiding he is a troll. I am also not confident its better to have an Islamist spew his BS than an alleged rape apologist spread his.

Anyway. What i was trying to express was, that NaySayers claim was a bit (too) one dimensional imho. Ymmv.
Cetero censeo religionem delendam esse
Reply
#22
RE: AD v. AF
(October 19, 2022 at 2:44 am)Deesse23 Wrote:
(October 18, 2022 at 11:23 pm)Nay_Sayer Wrote: I can say this place is subjectively better.

For one they have a rape apologist who hasn't been banned.

This place has an islamist and several trolls who have not been banned.

(October 19, 2022 at 11:45 am)Deesse23 Wrote:
(October 19, 2022 at 6:42 am)Jehanne Wrote: I'm glad that they've not been banned.  They are living examples of what's wrong with religious thinking.  I read that at the Guantanamo Bay prison the US guards were teaching the prisoners mathematics; it is clear that there is a reason for that.

I didnt say religious trolls . Naughty  For one, i am pretty confident he is just shitposting and being disruptive for the sake of it. He isnt even hiding he is a troll. I am also not confident its better to have an Islamist spew his BS than an alleged rape apologist spread his.

Anyway. What i was trying to express was, that NaySayers claim was a bit (too) one dimensional imho. Ymmv.

On AD Vorpal has outright stated if you're drunk and get raped you somehow deserved it.  How's that for dimensional?

He would have been banned after post #3 here.

I normally don't call out folks but I find that individual to be utterly repugnant.  

I'm not intending to start any board wars, They can do their thing and I'll do mine.  I'll leave the matter at that.
"For the only way to eternal glory is a life lived in service of our Lord, FSM; Verily it is FSM who is the perfect being the name higher than all names, king of all kings and will bestow upon us all, one day, The great reclaiming"  -The Prophet Boiardi-

      Conservative trigger warning.
[Image: s-l640.jpg]
                                                                                         
Reply
#23
RE: AD v. AF
Just cruised over there to see what's going on and saw the reason I don't frequent AD running her mouth and excusing the rape apologetics.

It was the 70s simply isn't an excuse that works for me....I was there in the 70s myself.

smh - SSDD
  
“If you are the smartest person in the room, then you are in the wrong room.” — Confucius
                                      
Reply
#24
RE: AD v. AF
That's what they get, I guess.
"Never trust a fox. Looks like a dog, behaves like a cat."
~ Erin Hunter
Reply
#25
RE: AD v. AF
(October 19, 2022 at 12:12 pm)arewethereyet Wrote: Just cruised over there to see what's going on and saw the reason I don't frequent AD running her mouth and excusing the rape apologetics.  

It was the 70s simply isn't an excuse that works for me....I was there in the 70s myself.  

smh - SSDD

I'll note that "It was the 70s" is approximately equal to "the legislation, enforcement, and adjudication of law was dominated by men".
Reply
#26
RE: AD v. AF
(October 19, 2022 at 7:25 pm)Jackalope Wrote:
(October 19, 2022 at 12:12 pm)arewethereyet Wrote: Just cruised over there to see what's going on and saw the reason I don't frequent AD running her mouth and excusing the rape apologetics.  

It was the 70s simply isn't an excuse that works for me....I was there in the 70s myself.  

smh - SSDD

I'll note that "It was the 70s" is approximately equal to "the legislation, enforcement, and adjudication of law was dominated by men".

The remarks were more regarding 'free sex while high/drunk/altered' which apparently means to some people that consent wasn't needed.

While I am aware that blaming the victim is less a thing now, having a buzz wasn't/isn't carte blanche...a kiss and a shot is not permission to do whatever else.
  
“If you are the smartest person in the room, then you are in the wrong room.” — Confucius
                                      
Reply
#27
RE: AD v. AF
(October 1, 2022 at 9:40 am)Jehanne Wrote:
(October 1, 2022 at 9:29 am)Tomato Wrote: No comment.

Ha! Do you post there? (You can cough once for Yes, twice for No.)

Since they don't allow username changes like this forum does, I created a new account and told them I was abandoning my main account. They didn't like that and didn't want to accept it, so they made it where I couldn't post on the new account. Therefore, I logged out and I'm not returning.
"Never trust a fox. Looks like a dog, behaves like a cat."
~ Erin Hunter
Reply
#28
RE: AD v. AF
I am not registered at AF; just curious if there are any discussion threads about this forum.
Reply
#29
RE: AD v. AF
(October 19, 2022 at 10:14 pm)Tomato Wrote:
(October 1, 2022 at 9:40 am)Jehanne Wrote: Ha!  Do you post there?  (You can cough once for Yes, twice for No.)

Since they don't allow username changes like this forum does, I created a new account and told them I was abandoning my main account. They didn't like that and didn't want to accept it, so they made it where I couldn't post on the new account. Therefore, I logged out and I'm not returning.

That's considered a sock account, everywhere else on the internet. I consider it surprising that you just weren't banned, outright, tbh. There was a guy at the old website, TTA, that said he was going to make a sock account, and did. He didn't get banned, either, but expressed proper contrition for doing it. But you be you.
If you get to thinking you’re a person of some influence, try ordering somebody else’s dog around.
Reply
#30
RE: AD v. AF
(October 19, 2022 at 10:40 pm)Fireball Wrote: But you be you.

Tongue
"Never trust a fox. Looks like a dog, behaves like a cat."
~ Erin Hunter
Reply





Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)