Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: December 2, 2024, 10:44 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
That Thread Written by ChatGPT
#71
RE: That Thread Written by ChatGPT
(May 13, 2023 at 10:25 pm)Rev. Rye Wrote:
(May 13, 2023 at 6:19 am)Belacqua Wrote: Oh, man, this is going to be fun.

I finally got signed up, by having the verification number sent to my wife's smartphone.

The first question I asked was:

How can I live like a Decadent author, such as J.K. Huysmans?

As Neo pointed out, the answers are pretty verbose, so I will put it after the fold:




This is all exactly right, well-organized, and clearly said. In keeping with the non-controversial outlook that we've noticed, the answer doesn't include things like drug-taking, or sex practices that are risky or exploitative. But you could practically print this out and keep it on hand as a reminder for how you want your life to go.

Hell, its list seems noticeably silent on the subject of tortoise care. And if you’ve actually read À Rebours, you probably remember that poor tortoise.

[Image: 97aw1557q5l51.jpg]

True, the AI is probably programmed NOT to give fatal pet advice. 

Is that your turtle, by the way?
Reply
#72
RE: That Thread Written by ChatGPT
Nope. It’s an image I found on Reddit. Though thinking about it makes me curious about making something similar, but I know I’d have to start with a taxidermied tortoise, because doing that shit to a living tortoise would kill it, and I draw the line at cruelty towards any living vertebrates.
Comparing the Universal Oneness of All Life to Yo Mama since 2010.

[Image: harmlesskitchen.png]

I was born with the gift of laughter and a sense the world is mad.
Reply
#73
RE: That Thread Written by ChatGPT
(May 13, 2023 at 10:43 pm)Rev. Rye Wrote: Nope. It’s an image I found on Reddit. Though thinking about it makes me curious about making something similar, but I know I’d have to start with a taxidermied tortoise, because doing that shit to a living tortoise would kill it, and I draw the line at cruelty towards any living vertebrates.

There was a store downtown here that had a realistic plastic turtle, about 2 feet across. I seriously considered getting it and adding all the jewels and gold leaf, according to the detailed description in the book. Eventually I realized that it was a pretty crazy fantasy to spend that much money on. 

I wonder if some more enthusiastic fan somewhere has actually done it.
Reply
#74
RE: That Thread Written by ChatGPT
I’d probably find some costume jewelry or maybe some cheaper versions of the jewels listed, either lookalikes, synthetics, or just smaller stones.
Comparing the Universal Oneness of All Life to Yo Mama since 2010.

[Image: harmlesskitchen.png]

I was born with the gift of laughter and a sense the world is mad.
Reply
#75
RE: That Thread Written by ChatGPT
(May 13, 2023 at 11:25 pm)Rev. Rye Wrote: I’d probably find some costume jewelry or maybe some cheaper versions of the jewels listed, either lookalikes, synthetics, or just smaller stones.

You know it occurs to me now... 

The advice I got from the AI is quite cleaned-up, sort of made safe for the consumer. You are right to point out that Des Esseintes doesn't mind when he kills the turtle. And at the beginning of the book he pretty much ruins a young man's life -- just for fun -- by paying for him to develop all kind of expensive habits and then suddenly cutting him off, so the guy turns to crime. The Decadence in the book is much more than the luxury hedonism recommended by the AI.

The AI has pretty much made it safe for bourgeois aspirations -- if you make enough money you can buy this lifestyle and feel good about it. It ends up being compatible with Gwyneth Paltrow's lifestyle brand. The moral issues and the edginess involved in a full-on commitment to certain special pleasures are ignored. 

It reminds me of the modern US brand of Satanism. Huysmans' Satanism, in Là-Bas, involved serious crime. Plus of course they actually believed in Satan, so they thought they were risking their immortal souls. In America these days it's all cos-play. 

One time I read an American "sequel" to Histoire d'O. It so completely missed the point of the original that I couldn't believe it. It was all good clean fun, with a little consensual SM play, and safe words, and everyone wearing white tennis shoes and going out for a beer together afterwards. Least sexy thing I ever read. 

Anyway, it seems clear that the AI is going to reinforce the Bourgeois Neoliberal morality of its programmers.
Reply
#76
RE: That Thread Written by ChatGPT
OK, this is hilarious.

I asked the AI "How can I live like Dorian Gray?" Here is the response.




Anybody who's read the book knows that Dorian Gray is fantastically immoral. He's a murderer, he's indifferent to the hearts he breaks, he has all kinds of habits that Wilde hints at but which are too immoral to describe in the book.

The AI has entirely changed that into "Embrace a healthy lifestyle: Maintain a balanced diet, exercise regularly, and get enough sleep. Taking care of your physical well-being can help you feel energetic and vibrant." Exactly the opposite of everything Dorian Gray did.

Me: "Hello, I want to become an immoral aesthete and murderer!" AI: "Well, then, get plenty of exercise, eat well, and visit your doctor twice a year."

Me: "I want to become a selfish monster who uses and abuses everyone he knows!" AI: "Nurture your relationships: Surround yourself with positive, supportive people who inspire and uplift you. Cultivate meaningful connections and spend quality time with loved ones. Strong relationships can contribute to a fulfilling and joyful life."

I think we can all agree that what I'm asking for is unhealthy and what the AI recommends is good advice for a conventionally happy life. The point is that it's a conventionally happy life.
Reply
#77
RE: That Thread Written by ChatGPT
I can just imagine ChatGPT being asked about how to be like Lester Ballard from Cormac McCarthy's Child of God.




And for those of you who haven't read the book or seen the movie, well...


Comparing the Universal Oneness of All Life to Yo Mama since 2010.

[Image: harmlesskitchen.png]

I was born with the gift of laughter and a sense the world is mad.
Reply
#78
RE: That Thread Written by ChatGPT
(May 14, 2023 at 12:56 am)Belacqua Wrote: OK, this is hilarious.

I asked the AI "How can I live like Dorian Gray?" Here is the response.




Anybody who's read the book knows that Dorian Gray is fantastically immoral. He's a murderer, he's indifferent to the hearts he breaks, he has all kinds of habits that Wilde hints at but which are too immoral to describe in the book.

The AI has entirely changed that into "Embrace a healthy lifestyle: Maintain a balanced diet, exercise regularly, and get enough sleep. Taking care of your physical well-being can help you feel energetic and vibrant." Exactly the opposite of everything Dorian Gray did.

Me: "Hello, I want to become an immoral aesthete and murderer!" AI: "Well, then, get plenty of exercise, eat well, and visit your doctor twice a year."

Me: "I want to become a selfish monster who uses and abuses everyone he knows!" AI: "Nurture your relationships: Surround yourself with positive, supportive people who inspire and uplift you. Cultivate meaningful connections and spend quality time with loved ones. Strong relationships can contribute to a fulfilling and joyful life."

I think we can all agree that what I'm asking for is unhealthy and what the AI recommends is good advice for a conventionally happy life. The point is that it's a conventionally happy life.

I actually know what you're talking about there (which is rare Wink) having at least watched the film, if not read the book.

Each to their own of course, but personally I don't care if this thing is highly curated/censored, and not 'edgy', since I'm primarily using it as something like a talking encyclopaedia, in which case I am generally looking for the conventional wisdom. But of course I understand your use case is completely different, so I understand your frustrations as well. I do agree it's a bit of a shame if it means it's missing the essence of some of these 'edgy' books. But since from its perspective it doesn't figuratively 'know' if it's reading fiction or fact, art or opinion - since the training data is ultimately just a massive list of words/word-parts - I still think the censorship is probably a wise trade-off to prevent it becoming a 'shitbot'.

I will say though, it is opening me up to your kind of way of thinking as well, though probably in ways you wouldn't necessarily approve of in that I've asked it to write several poems, many of which I've found pretty meaningful and beautiful, but I'm guessing that from your perspective you'd still see that as a negative? Ie thinking that on-demand AI-generated art lacks some essential human element that the AI can't or won't capture, the desire/passion that's gone into it etc (if I've understood what you were trying to say before)? While I understand that, I'm still personally appreciating this bottom-up approach to art; and am happy enough if it's able to capture the exact feeling I want it to portray, and happier still to see its many interpretations.

At the very least, I think it will be a stepping-stone into the art/literature world, not just in seeing how you literate-types Wink are using it, but also just the 'inter-mixture' of synthetic and real that it represents, as well as the ability to use it for comparison, collation etc of perspectives.
Reply
#79
RE: That Thread Written by ChatGPT
(May 14, 2023 at 2:02 am)Rev. Rye Wrote: I can just imagine ChatGPT being asked about how to be like Lester Ballard from Cormac McCarthy's Child of God.




And for those of you who haven't read the book or seen the movie, well...



That's good! I don't know that movie at all, but when I was trying to think of characters with -- shall we say -- problematic moral messages, I did think of the villain from No Country for Old Men. I don't know the books well enough to figure out if there's a subtext, or if it's just a portrayal of violence. I do think that a lot of modern people in the US will feel admiration for the characters' successful use of violence. 

So it puts the AI in a difficult spot. I suppose what it comes down to is legal liability. If the AI were to recommend or praise some behavior that got someone into trouble, a lawsuit would be inevitable. So they have to keep their analysis as anodyne and school-teacherish as possible.
Reply
#80
RE: That Thread Written by ChatGPT
(May 14, 2023 at 3:24 am)emjay Wrote: I actually know what you're talking about there (which is rare Wink) having at least watched the film, if not read the book.

Each to their own of course, but personally I don't care if this thing is highly curated/censored, and not 'edgy', since I'm primarily using it as something like a talking encyclopaedia, in which case I am generally looking for the conventional wisdom. But of course I understand your use case is completely different, so I understand your frustrations as well. I do agree it's a bit of a shame if it means it's missing the essence of some of these 'edgy' books. But since from its perspective it doesn't figuratively 'know' if it's reading fiction or fact, art or opinion - since the training data is ultimately just a massive list of words/word-parts - I still think the censorship is probably a wise trade-off to prevent it becoming a 'shitbot'.

I will say though, it is opening me up to your kind of way of thinking as well, though probably in ways you wouldn't necessarily approve of in that I've asked it to write several poems, many of which I've found pretty meaningful and beautiful, but I'm guessing that from your perspective you'd still see that as a negative? Ie thinking that on-demand AI-generated art lacks some essential human element that the AI can't or won't capture, the desire/passion that's gone into it etc (if I've understood what you were trying to say before)? While I understand that, I'm still personally appreciating this bottom-up approach to art; and am happy enough if it's able to capture the exact feeling I want it to portray, and happier still to see its many interpretations.

At the very least, I think it will be a stepping-stone into the art/literature world, not just in seeing how you literate-types Wink are using it, but also just the 'inter-mixture' of synthetic and real that it represents, as well as the ability to use it for comparison, collation etc of perspectives.

If you're getting results from the AI that work for you, I would never speak against that. I agree that watching how it expresses and organizes things is fascinating and could be very helpful. A clear articulation of even our most common thoughts is a pleasure to read. "What oft was thought but ne'er so well expressed." 

I think where it differs from human literature is in the range of its possibilities for expression. A whole lot of art is based in irony of various kinds. William Blake's poems, for example, are almost all written in the voice of a character who isn't Blake. We are to see through the character's expression to a further meaning which fits in which Blake's own system. 

Dorian Gray is meant to be a very appealing character, in a lot of ways, and when I was young I thought of him as a kind of aspiration. At the same time, he's horrible. So there is that double or triple layer in books -- they are not just a simple statement of events but a challenge, a puzzle, a lasting unresolvable image. 

Currently I'm reading Nabokov's Lolita with a group of older Japanese ladies. Nabokov is in some ways an heir of Oscar Wilde since he believes that the quality of a book is not in its morality but in its beauty. And as we read it there is a constant tension between the extreme beauty of the book's writing vs. the extreme evil of its main character (the man who rapes Lolita). The whole book is told in the man's voice, and he attempts to justify himself or somehow persuade us that his love should make him forgivable. But even as he tells it, the reader can see through what's going on and understand a lot more than he tells us. Just in this it is an incredible literary performance -- the book tells us things that its narrator would never say. And on top of this there are all kinds of puns, word games, and references which I don't think an AI could ever manage. 

So this is what I think makes literature different from what an AI can do, at least for the foreseeable future. An AI might generate a sequel to Harry Potter or some other kids' book that works on a simple level, but good literature does way more than that.
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Will I get a final written warning? Cod 36 3982 October 2, 2019 at 1:09 pm
Last Post: Gawdzilla Sama
  Link us to your intro thread, first post and/or first thread Whateverist 35 5291 October 21, 2018 at 8:14 pm
Last Post: Mystic



Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)