A Rebellious People

[Authari]

You're telling me that if I hook up to a 4 year old for 9 months it will save its life? Jesus Christ I'd have to be some kind of monster to say 'fuck you I don't want you connected to me go die you fucking little child you're a worthless piece of shit that should never been born' I don't have to be forced to do anything in this scenario because I'd voluntarily say 'hook me up' if it was to save some kid's life.

After all these pages you still didnt understand a thing.
In YOUR world, its not up to you to decide whats gonna happen. You will not have come to the point where you decide to stay hooked. Your opinion on this will be IRRELEVANT.
Its not about what you choose and why, but about the fact that you can NOT choose.

And no I don't want to give unborn infants any special rights,

Yes you do. Otherwise please tell us in which case person #1 has the right to use the body of person #2, and person #2 has no say in this.
GO!

just the right to life which you and I enjoy, and I do not think that the mother's promiscuity should play a deciding factor in determining whether that unborn child ought to live or not

Bolding mine
And again, i call you out for misogynism, you misogynist peice of shit. Women get pregnant all the time, mosty without being promiscuous.
Your disdain for women really shows. So, fuck you.

, certainly I don't think that just because a woman spread her legs that that gives her the right to terminate the life....

not necessary to proivde yet more evidece of your misogyny.

How did you come to hate all women so much. Was that prevalent before your religion poisoned your mind, or were you a misogynist piece of shit beforehand?

Disdain for women? I'm not the one advocating that a mother should rip the life of her child from her womb in one of the most grotesque ways possible known to man. Also your only response was to call me a misogynist. As for what gives them the right? I've stated it multiple times, because they are a sentient being capable of feeling fear and love, and sentient beings are given the right to life, the mother had she not wanted children could have easily chosen not to welcome that seed into her womb, in the act of her copulation she consented for that life to grow in her because she did invite that seed into her womb. Again you reprobate you should not advocate for the shedding of innocent blood over a childish desire to be free from responsibility, you should mature and grow up and accept responsibility for your actions, as should all women who find themselves mothers to be. Saying that innocent children should be murdered by the hand of their own mother just because society said its acceptable does not make it right, rather it shows the degradation of our society and the lack of respect that is given to human life. How can you call yourself a humanitarian when you advocate to shed innocent blood? When you advocate that a mother should murder their own children. Who really is the misogynist here? Because if you really cared about women you would hold them to a higher standard than the one you currently do. It is the standards we set for ourselves that determines how we live our lives.

You clearly have very low standards if you advocate for a mother to take the life of her own child.

[The Grand Nudger]

Ew, fucking isn't consent for impregnation. Anyway, it's you, you're really the misogynist here. You might think that you're right to be so, but it is what it is.

You decided whether you're a snitch, a goon, or a butcher yet? I guess you could dabble in all three.

[Authari]

Ew, fucking isn't consent for impregnation.  Anyway, it's you, you're really the misogynist here.  You might think that you're right to be so, but it is what it is.

Well you silly billy what do you think coitus makes? It really is an open invitation to get pregnant.

Yes I'm the misogynist here, that's easier for you isn't it? To call me a misogynist rather than try to make a rational counter to my points?

[Fake Messiah]

Yes I'm the misogynist here, that's easier for you isn't it? To call me a misogynist rather than try to make a rational counter to my points?

What else are we supposed to call people who adhere to the torture of women? This is what your sick activism amounts to

[The Grand Nudger]

Ew, fucking isn't consent for impregnation.  Anyway, it's you, you're really the misogynist here.  You might think that you're right to be so, but it is what it is.

Well you silly billy what do you think coitus makes? It really is an open invitation to get pregnant.

Yes I'm the misogynist here, that's easier for you isn't it? To call me a misogynist rather than try to make a rational counter to my points?

Looks like you've got yourself a dilemma.  You want to be a misogynist, you just don't want to be called one.  At some point you'll have to decide which of those two things really matters to you.

[h4ym4n]

Ew, fucking isn't consent for impregnation.  Anyway, it's you, you're really the misogynist here.  You might think that you're right to be so, but it is what it is.

Well you silly billy what do you think coitus makes? It really is an open invitation to get pregnant.

Yes I'm the misogynist here, that's easier for you isn't it? To call me a misogynist rather than try to make a rational counter to my points?

The god you worship is the one that kill babies or orders other people to kill babies, right?

It also raped and knocked up a young virgin, right?


Just want to make sure I know what god you’re pushing.

[Authari]

Well you silly billy what do you think coitus makes? It really is an open invitation to get pregnant.

Yes I'm the misogynist here, that's easier for you isn't it? To call me a misogynist rather than try to make a rational counter to my points?

Looks like you've got yourself a dilemma.  You want to be a misogynist, you just don't want to be called one.  At some point you'll have to decide which of those two things really matters to you.

Is it the misogynist who advocates for women to act like trollops so that they may please him sexually? or to hold fast to the virtue of chasteness?
Is it the misogynist who advocates for a mother to take the life of their own child so that he doesn't have to accept the consequences of his actions? Or does the misogynist instead tell her that they'll work through this together and that he'll take responsibility for the child?



You're still losing even on the misogynist argument, jeez, you can't win at any argument that involves critical thinking can you? Its almost as if... you weren't a critical thinker...

[arewethereyet]

Anyone else smell incel?

[Authari]

Anyone else smell incel?

Ooooh now we're going to go to calling me an incel now that the misogynist route didn't pan out for you? How do you think calling me an incel is going to win this pro-life debate? Oh no I'm sorry that's just your immaturity showing, you never grew up thinking about accepting responsibility did you? No you wanted to stay in your consequence free childhood and that followed you into adulthood, you abandoned God to be free of any consequence of Sin (afterall if there is no God there can't be such a thing as sin meaning you could do whatever you want) and following that you chose 'sexual liberation' following after the carnal desire of the flesh, which the New Testament warns against if you ever bothered reading it, you are cloaked with spiritual leprosy and you would advocate the deepest of abominations that a mother should take the life of her own child.

[arewethereyet]

You are clueless, as usual.