What has Christianity truly contributed to humanity

[Nishant Xavier]

Ok, Anom. Let's engage in a little verbal duelling: Firstly, it's dishonest of Militant Anti-Christian Atheists like you not to first of all put up one of your own, a Famous Anti-Christian Atheist, to compare and contrast with our Famous Founder in Teaching, Morality, Life and Example. Whoever it is, it is the easiest thing in the world to show Jesus Christ vastly outstrips him or her in Universal Morality. Thus I took the example of that Famous Anti-Christian Atheist Darwin. He called Christianity a "Damnable Doctrine" through projection. He was a known Racist. So was that Famous Anti-Christian Atheist Marx. Whereas Jesus Christ, a Brown Man from Asia, taught the World to love one's Neighbor as one's own self, and proved by His Great Samaritan Parable that Love for Neighbor must transcend the Boundaries of Race and Religion. He spoke to His Fellow Jews, Asians like Him, on terms of equal love and friendship as He did to Gentile Romans, who were Europeans. His Apostles, taught by His Example and Holy Life, did the same to Africans, unlike those Atheist Racist Thugs Marx and Darwin, as we read in the Acts of the Apostles chapter 8: 

---

30 Then Philip ran up to the chariot and heard the man reading Isaiah the prophet. “Do you understand what you are reading?” Philip asked.
31 “How can I,” he said, “unless someone explains it to me?” So he invited Philip to come up and sit with him.
32 This is the passage of Scripture [i.e. Isaiah 53, the Prophetic Proof of Christianity] the eunuch was reading:
“He was led like a sheep to the slaughter,
    and as a lamb before its shearer is silent,
    so he did not open his mouth.
33 In his humiliation he was deprived of justice.
    Who can speak of his descendants?
    For his life was taken from the earth.”
34 The eunuch asked Philip, “Tell me, please, who is the prophet talking about, himself or someone else?” 35 Then Philip began with that very passage of Scripture and told him the good news about Jesus.
36 As they traveled along the road, they came to some water and the eunuch said, “Look, here is water. What can stand in the way of my being baptized?” [37] 38 And he gave orders to stop the chariot. Then both Philip and the eunuch went down into the water and Philip baptized him. 39 When they came up out of the water, the Spirit of the Lord suddenly took Philip away, and the eunuch did not see him again, but went on his way rejoicing. 40 Philip, however, appeared at Azotus and traveled about, preaching the gospel in all the towns until he reached Caesarea."

---

And that's the Story of the First African Christian, of whom there are now 700 MN. No wonder, given that Christ and His Apostles welcomed them with so much Love and gave them Baptism and thus Salvation if they persevered in Christ, whereas Marx and Darwin hated them, that Marx and Darwin have failed so spectacularly in Africa, while Jesus Christ has succeeded so spectacularly. It was not a Dead Man, misguided Soul, who did this, but the Living God. When will you learn, like the Pharisees who killed Him because they said: "If we let Him go on like this, everyone will believe in Him" (Jn 11:48), that Jesus Christ could never be stopped, not even after His Death? The Good African People know who truly loved them and it was never that Anti-Christian Atheist Marx nor that Anti-Christian Darwin but only that First and Best Christian of all, Jesus Christ.

Jesus Christ is the Solution to the Problems, even Moral Problems, caused by Darwin and Marx, such as Racism, to which the only Solution is Christ's Universal Love for all Peoples, He and His Disciples loved Europeans such as Romans as equally as they loved Africans such as Ethiopians as much as they loved their fellow Jews and Asians. Christianity= +100; Atheism= -100. And that was 2000 years ago, so Darwin and Marx are without excuse for their Racism.

[Fake Messiah]

He was a known Racist.

Darwin was not a racist. A racist is the one who claims that a woman native to Palestine two thousand years ago was white - and that one is you. You are a white supremacist piece of shit.

[h4ym4n]

The Moral Doctrine of Christianity is summed up in Love your neighbor as yourself, and Do unto others as you would have them do unto yourself, 

As long as they believe in the same godthing as you, right?

Fuck everyone else 

[Fake Messiah]

And since we are talking about racism and creationism, guess who is very racist? It is the people behind Nishant's favorite webpage - answers in Genesis - the place from which he learns and pastes everything he knows about creationism.

Here is Ken Ham posing with one of his main funders, Michael Peroutka. This guy donated millions to the creation museum, but he is a member of the League of the South, a white supremacist and white nationalist organization designated by the Southern Poverty Law Center as a hate group.

[BrianSoddingBoru4]

And since we are talking about racism and creationism, guess who is very racist? It is the people behind Nishant's favorite webpage - answers in Genesis - the place from which he learns and pastes everything he knows about creationism.

Here is Ken Ham posing with one of his main funders, Michael Peroutka. This guy donated millions to the creation museum, but he is a member of the League of the South, a white supremacist and white nationalist organization designated by the Southern Poverty Law Center as a hate group.

It's possible that not all creationists are racists, but it's sure as taxes that they've all agreed racism isn't a deal-breaker.

Boru

[Nishant Xavier]

Lol. Not a Racist. Darwin said: "It is very true what you say about the higher races of men, when high enough, will have spread & exterminated whole nations.” Both a false moral teacher and a false Prophet, since that never happened.

Compare him to both Devout British Christians like Missionary to Africa David Livingstone: "However, not all British men and women in the 19th century embraced racism. Some prominent British intellectuals, missionaries, and church leaders believed that black Africans, for instance, were equal to Europeans and only needed the proper education and upbringing to attain the technological sophistication of the Europeans. The famous British missionary and African explorer David Livingstone not only rejected the notion that black Africans were unequal to Europeans, but also devoted his life to showing them love and compassion." as well as some good Non-Christians who were not Militant Atheists. Taken from: https://evolutionnews.org/2022/02/the-ra...darwinism/ Darwinism was born in racist sin and conceived in genocidal iniquity, openly predicting extermination of alleged whole inferior peopls, which actually never happened, as everyone knows some 200 years later.

[Nishant Xavier]

As the above link rightly concludes: "No wonder Livingstone was beloved by Africans and is still fondly remembered by black Africans.9"

Wiki: "David Livingstone FRGS FRS (/ˈlɪvɪŋstən/; 19 March 1813 – 4 May 1873) was a Scottish physician, Congregationalist, and pioneer Christian missionary[2] with the London Missionary Society, an explorer in Africa, who wanted to abolish slavery,[3] and one of the most popular British heroes of the late 19th-century Victorian era. David was the husband of Mary Moffat Livingstone, from the prominent 18th-century missionary family, Moffat.[4] Livingstone had a mythic status that operated on a number of interconnected levels: Protestant missionary martyr, working-class "rags-to-riches" inspirational story, scientific investigator and explorer, imperial reformer, anti-slavery crusader, and advocate of British commercial and colonial expansion."

From: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Livingstone

Hey Darwin, to whom did you ever show Love and Compassion like David Livingstone did, you professing Son of a Monkey, you. Lol. You follow Darwin if you want. I'll follow Christ and those who followed Him well.

[no one]

You get the real good drugs, don't you, nishy?

[BrianSoddingBoru4]

As the above link rightly concludes: "No wonder Livingstone was beloved by Africans and is still fondly remembered by black Africans.9"

Wiki: "David Livingstone FRGS FRS (/ˈlɪvɪŋstən/; 19 March 1813 – 4 May 1873) was a Scottish physician, Congregationalist, and pioneer Christian missionary[2] with the London Missionary Society, an explorer in Africa, who wanted to abolish slavery,[3] and one of the most popular British heroes of the late 19th-century Victorian era. David was the husband of Mary Moffat Livingstone, from the prominent 18th-century missionary family, Moffat.[4] Livingstone had a mythic status that operated on a number of interconnected levels: Protestant missionary martyr, working-class "rags-to-riches" inspirational story, scientific investigator and explorer, imperial reformer, anti-slavery crusader, and advocate of British commercial and colonial expansion."

From: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Livingstone

Hey Darwin, to whom did you ever show Love and Compassion like David Livingstone did, you professing Son of a Monkey, you. Lol. You follow Darwin if you want. I'll follow Christ and those who followed Him well.

For every David Livingstone, there’s a Cecil Rhodes.

Boru

[Nishant Xavier]

Yup, unfortunately there is. Such men are sinners and will be judged by God as the sinners they were. So was that Terrorist Thug "General" Dyer and those he killed in the Jalianwala Bagh Massacre, because he refused to acknowledge Indians have the same inalienable human rights as the Britishers do, in our own Country at that. 

"The massacre caused a re-evaluation by the British Army of its military role against civilians to "minimal force whenever possible", although later British actions during the Mau Mau rebellion in the Kenya Colony have led historian Huw Bennett to comment that the new policy could sometimes be put aside.[9] The army was retrained and developed less violent tactics for crowd control.[10] The level of casual brutality, and lack of any accountability, stunned the entire nation,[11] resulting in a wrenching loss of faith of the general Indian public in the intentions of the United Kingdom.[12] The attack was condemned by the Secretary of State for War, Winston Churchill, as "unutterably monstrous", and in the UK House of Commons debate on 8 July 1920 Members of Parliament voted 247 to 37 against Dyer. The ineffective inquiry, together with the initial accolades for Dyer, fuelled great widespread anger against the British among the Indian populace, leading to the non-cooperation movement of 1920–22.[13] Some historians consider the episode a decisive step towards the end of British rule in India.[14][15] ...

Rabindranath Tagore received the news of the massacre by 22 May 1919. He tried to arrange a protest meeting in Calcutta and finally decided to renounce his British knighthood as "a symbolic act of protest".[68] In the repudiation letter, dated 31 May 1919 and addressed to the Viceroy of India, Lord Chelmsford, he wrote "I ... wish to stand, shorn, of all special distinctions, by the side of those of my countrymen who, for their so called insignificance, are liable to suffer degradation not fit for human beings."[69]"

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jallianwala_Bagh_massacre

Now, one of the good things earlier British Christian Missionaries - unlike Thugs like Dyer - did, and in this they were following Jesus Christ and practicing Universal Love, was the Abolition of Sati and Education against this misguided practice, which ultimately benefited Indian Women. William Carey and William Wilberforce were examples of those who did this and who put pressure on the East India Company to do it.

"The first official British response to sati was in 1680 when the Agent of Madras Streynsham Master intervened and prohibited the burning of a Hindu widow [102][103] in Madras Presidency. Attempts to limit or ban the practice had been made by individual British officers, but without the backing of the East India Company. This is because it followed a policy of non-interference in Hindu religious affairs and there was no legislation or ban against Sati.[104] The first formal British ban was imposed in 1798, in the city of Calcutta only. The practice continued in surrounding regions. In the beginning of the 19th century, the evangelical church in Britain, and its members in India, started campaigns against sati. This activism came about during a period when British missionaries in India began focusing on promoting and establishing Christian educational systems as a distinctive contribution of theirs to the missionary enterprise as a whole.[105] Leaders of these campaigns included William Carey and William Wilberforce. These movements put pressure on the company to ban the act. William Carey, and the other missionaries at Serampore conducted in 1803–04 a census on cases of sati for a region within a 30-mile radius of Calcutta, finding more than 300 such cases there.[91] The missionaries also approached Hindu theologians, who opined that the practice was encouraged, rather than enjoined by the Hindu scriptures.[106][107]"

From: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sati_(practice)