Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 23, 2024, 8:15 am

Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 1 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Does reading a lot of Wikipedia give people a wrong idea how science works?
RE: Does reading a lot of Wikipedia give people a wrong idea how science works?
Nothing.
"Never trust a fox. Looks like a dog, behaves like a cat."
~ Erin Hunter
Reply
RE: Does reading a lot of Wikipedia give people a wrong idea how science works?
(October 31, 2023 at 4:11 pm)FlatAssembler Wrote: What do you think about Israel loosening its gun control laws in response to terrorist attacks? https://youtu.be/g9fKK_9zVdg?si=_G4L07-H9qUZNfup

I think it’s a knee-jerk reaction that will have no significant impact on terrorists’ activities. I suspect that it will increase the number of accidental shootings - if you give someone a gun and say, ‘This is to protect yourself from terrorists’, they’re going to start seeing militant Islamists everywhere they look.

Boru
‘I can’t be having with this.’ - Esmeralda Weatherwax
Reply
RE: Does reading a lot of Wikipedia give people a wrong idea how science works?
Quote:What do you think about Israel loosening its gun control laws in response to terrorist attacks?
Because they are reacting irrationally Dodgy
"Change was inevitable"


Nemo sicut deus debet esse!

[Image: Canada_Flag.jpg?v=1646203843]



 “No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM


      
Reply
RE: Does reading a lot of Wikipedia give people a wrong idea how science works?
(October 30, 2023 at 11:20 am)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote:
(October 30, 2023 at 10:30 am)FlatAssembler Wrote: That is like asking how high somebody's body temperature has to be before you try bloodletting. You should not try bloodletting until you have solid mechanistic evidence that it works. Similarly, you should not try banning high-tech weapons and preventing mentally ill people from owning a firearm (which is what "gun control" essentially means) before you have solid mechanistic evidence that it would do anything to decrease mass shootings.

Here’s your solid, mechanistic evidence:

-Countries with the strictest gun control measures have the lowest incidence of gun violence.

-Countries with the loosest gun control measures have the highest incidence of gun violence.

Now, get back under your bridge and wait for the goats.

Boru

You don't know what "mechanistic evidence" means, do you?
Reply
RE: Does reading a lot of Wikipedia give people a wrong idea how science works?
(October 30, 2023 at 4:51 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: I’m still trying to grasp why he thinks mental illnesses, including (I presume) things like PTSD, paranoia, and antisocial personality disorder should NOT be a bar to carrying a gun.

Boru

Because people with mental illness are significantly more likely to be victims of violence. So, gun control takes the means of defence out of the hands of the victims.
Reply
RE: Does reading a lot of Wikipedia give people a wrong idea how science works?
(November 4, 2023 at 9:45 am)FlatAssembler Wrote:
(October 30, 2023 at 4:51 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: I’m still trying to grasp why he thinks mental illnesses, including (I presume) things like PTSD, paranoia, and antisocial personality disorder should NOT be a bar to carrying a gun.

Boru

Because people with mental illness are significantly more likely to be victims of violence. So, gun control takes the means of defence out of the hands of the victims.

Citation needed.
[Image: MmQV79M.png]  
                                      
Reply
RE: Does reading a lot of Wikipedia give people a wrong idea how science works?
(November 4, 2023 at 9:54 am)arewethereyet Wrote:
(November 4, 2023 at 9:45 am)FlatAssembler Wrote: Because people with mental illness are significantly more likely to be victims of violence. So, gun control takes the means of defence out of the hands of the victims.

Citation needed.

The first result I got on Google: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK537064/
Reply
RE: Does reading a lot of Wikipedia give people a wrong idea how science works?
That article appears to focus on the mentally ill causing violence toward others, not being victims of violence.

Try again.
[Image: MmQV79M.png]  
                                      
Reply
RE: Does reading a lot of Wikipedia give people a wrong idea how science works?
(November 4, 2023 at 10:36 am)arewethereyet Wrote: That article appears to focus on the mentally ill causing violence toward others, not being victims of violence.

Try again.

OK, here is another one:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1525086/ Wrote:A recent study of criminal victimization of persons with severe mental illness showed that 8.2% were criminally victimized over a four month period, much higher than the annual rate of violent victimization of 3.1 for the general population.
Reply
RE: Does reading a lot of Wikipedia give people a wrong idea how science works?
(November 4, 2023 at 9:43 am)FlatAssembler Wrote:
(October 30, 2023 at 11:20 am)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: Here’s your solid, mechanistic evidence:

-Countries with the strictest gun control measures have the lowest incidence of gun violence.

-Countries with the loosest gun control measures have the highest incidence of gun violence.

Now, get back under your bridge and wait for the goats.

Boru

You don't know what "mechanistic evidence" means, do you?

I do indeed, and it precisely fits what I said above, you ignorant, reality-denying wretch.

Boru
‘I can’t be having with this.’ - Esmeralda Weatherwax
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Google's Mobile-Friendly Test Driving Me Batty: What am I Doing Wrong? Rhondazvous 10 3127 August 14, 2015 at 12:05 pm
Last Post: Longhorn
  Reading redefined! Napoléon 31 3967 April 18, 2014 at 7:15 pm
Last Post: NoraBrimstone
  Please give me link voting english website A-g-n-o-s-t-i-c 4 1736 December 24, 2013 at 2:29 am
Last Post: A-g-n-o-s-t-i-c
  Idea for a service / business. Tiberius 3 1461 April 27, 2012 at 5:17 am
Last Post: frankiej
  Prof. Alan Woodward is Wrong; The Internet is Fine Tiberius 14 5808 March 15, 2012 at 4:49 pm
Last Post: Tiberius



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)