Posts: 46103
Threads: 538
Joined: July 24, 2013
Reputation:
109
RE: Why no Mars
October 6, 2024 at 4:56 am
(October 6, 2024 at 2:02 am)AFTT47 Wrote: (October 5, 2024 at 6:24 pm)HappySkeptic Wrote: Okay, Elon, let's say Skynet destroys humanity, or a planet killer asteroid hits. Your colony of a few hundred people have no way of sustaining their technology without help from Earth. You would need mining, smelting, and heavy manufacturing, energy and air creation facilities, high tech food growing facilities.
Yes, this is the crux of the problem. You may be able to maintain a database with the sum knowledge of humankind up to the present but to actually implement all of that knowledge, to manifest it into a civilization equal to the present one would be a herculean task.
On the other hand, SpaceX has advanced the state of the art in rocketry to a point most engineers thought was impossible just 15 years ago. That's just Falcon 9. Starship is an order of magnitude beyond that. That tech could be used for much more realistic endeavors such as establishing a space-based infrastructure which will eventually lead us to become a true space-fairing civilization. Barring radical life extension tech, it won't give us huge rotating space settlements in any of our lifetimes but it'll allow us to build the foundation for that.
For that reason, many of us support Musk's Mars efforts even while we acknowledge and agree that they are ridiculous. He is building the tools we need to expand into space realistically - when nobody else has the vision, resources and courage to do so.
Why would we need to ‘become a true space-faring civilization’? While I don’t deny that scientific research is serendipitous, Musk’s vision seems like a vanity project unlikely to show practical benefits in either the near or long term.
Boru
‘I can’t be having with this.’ - Esmeralda Weatherwax
Posts: 16939
Threads: 461
Joined: March 29, 2015
Reputation:
30
RE: Why no Mars
October 6, 2024 at 7:43 am
(This post was last modified: October 6, 2024 at 7:44 am by Fake Messiah.)
(October 6, 2024 at 2:02 am)AFTT47 Wrote: Starship is an order of magnitude beyond that. That tech could be used for much more realistic endeavors such as establishing a space-based infrastructure which will eventually lead us to become a true space-fairing civilization.
It isn't. Starship barely made it to orbit once and then exploded. It not only wasn't carrying any cargo with it but it wasn't even under pressure - it had holes. So it was just a hunk of metal that he launched into space.
teachings of the Bible are so muddled and self-contradictory that it was possible for Christians to happily burn heretics alive for five long centuries. It was even possible for the most venerated patriarchs of the Church, like St. Augustine and St. Thomas Aquinas, to conclude that heretics should be tortured (Augustine) or killed outright (Aquinas). Martin Luther and John Calvin advocated the wholesale murder of heretics, apostates, Jews, and witches. - Sam Harris, "Letter To A Christian Nation"
Posts: 8272
Threads: 47
Joined: September 12, 2015
Reputation:
42
RE: Why no Mars
October 6, 2024 at 3:32 pm
(September 30, 2024 at 4:23 pm)bemore Wrote: Having humanity on another planet is a nice back up, should Earth get hit by something from space.
But we're hundreds, if not thousands of years away from doing so.
And frankly Galaxy Brain's way of getting us on the second planet is to destroy our ability to live on the first one.
Urbs Antiqua Fuit Studiisque Asperrima Belli
Home
Posts: 46103
Threads: 538
Joined: July 24, 2013
Reputation:
109
RE: Why no Mars
October 6, 2024 at 3:34 pm
To be as fair as possible, colonizing Mars isn’t a bad idea just because Musk wants to do it. It’s a bad idea, full stop.
Boru
‘I can’t be having with this.’ - Esmeralda Weatherwax
Posts: 35277
Threads: 204
Joined: August 13, 2012
Reputation:
146
RE: Why no Mars
October 6, 2024 at 3:37 pm
I think our first colony on Mars should include...
Donald Trump.
Elon Musk.
Donald Trump's immediate family.
Elon Musk's immediate family (except the daughter he disowned).
All of Donald Trump's MAGA supporters.
Vladimir Putin and friends
And, oh dear, there won't be room for supplies...
Playing Cluedo with my mum while I was at Uni:
"You did WHAT? With WHO? WHERE???"
Posts: 9871
Threads: 21
Joined: September 8, 2015
Reputation:
79
RE: Why no Mars
October 6, 2024 at 4:14 pm
(October 6, 2024 at 3:37 pm)The Valkyrie Wrote: I think our first colony on Mars should include...
Donald Trump.
Elon Musk.
Donald Trump's immediate family.
Elon Musk's immediate family (except the daughter he disowned).
All of Donald Trump's MAGA supporters.
Vladimir Putin and friends
And, oh dear, there won't be room for supplies...
They can eat each other. Problem solved. Trump meat probably smells like a McDonalds "kitchen", though.
If you get to thinking you’re a person of some influence, try ordering somebody else’s dog around.
Posts: 16450
Threads: 127
Joined: July 10, 2013
Reputation:
65
RE: Why no Mars
October 6, 2024 at 4:19 pm
(October 6, 2024 at 3:37 pm)The Valkyrie Wrote: I think our first colony on Mars should include...
Donald Trump.
Elon Musk.
Donald Trump's immediate family.
Elon Musk's immediate family (except the daughter he disowned).
All of Donald Trump's MAGA supporters.
Vladimir Putin and friends
And, oh dear, there won't be room for supplies...
Oh good. My brother needs to be sent somewhere far, far away.
Posts: 3290
Threads: 118
Joined: January 19, 2015
Reputation:
30
RE: Why no Mars
October 6, 2024 at 4:43 pm
(October 6, 2024 at 4:56 am)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: (October 6, 2024 at 2:02 am)AFTT47 Wrote: Yes, this is the crux of the problem. You may be able to maintain a database with the sum knowledge of humankind up to the present but to actually implement all of that knowledge, to manifest it into a civilization equal to the present one would be a herculean task.
On the other hand, SpaceX has advanced the state of the art in rocketry to a point most engineers thought was impossible just 15 years ago. That's just Falcon 9. Starship is an order of magnitude beyond that. That tech could be used for much more realistic endeavors such as establishing a space-based infrastructure which will eventually lead us to become a true space-fairing civilization. Barring radical life extension tech, it won't give us huge rotating space settlements in any of our lifetimes but it'll allow us to build the foundation for that.
For that reason, many of us support Musk's Mars efforts even while we acknowledge and agree that they are ridiculous. He is building the tools we need to expand into space realistically - when nobody else has the vision, resources and courage to do so.
Why would we need to ‘become a true space-faring civilization’? While I don’t deny that scientific research is serendipitous, Musk’s vision seems like a vanity project unlikely to show practical benefits in either the near or long term.
Boru
I don't suppose we do but we will be extremely limited if we don't.
Musk's vision has already shown practical benefits. Falcon 9 is a major advance over previous rockets. A practical orbital system where the booster is routinely and reliably reused at economic benefit is something most engineers thought impossible. When starship is operational, it will reduce the cost of lifting heavy loads to orbit ten-fold.
Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former.
Albert Einstein
Posts: 3290
Threads: 118
Joined: January 19, 2015
Reputation:
30
RE: Why no Mars
October 6, 2024 at 4:49 pm
(October 6, 2024 at 7:43 am)Fake Messiah Wrote: (October 6, 2024 at 2:02 am)AFTT47 Wrote: Starship is an order of magnitude beyond that. That tech could be used for much more realistic endeavors such as establishing a space-based infrastructure which will eventually lead us to become a true space-fairing civilization.
It isn't. Starship barely made it to orbit once and then exploded. It not only wasn't carrying any cargo with it but it wasn't even under pressure - it had holes. So it was just a hunk of metal that he launched into space.
I didn't think I would need to spell it out but I can do that.
Starship is in development. I was speaking of its capabilities when it is finished.
Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former.
Albert Einstein
Posts: 46103
Threads: 538
Joined: July 24, 2013
Reputation:
109
RE: Why no Mars
October 6, 2024 at 5:10 pm
(October 6, 2024 at 4:43 pm)AFTT47 Wrote: (October 6, 2024 at 4:56 am)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: Why would we need to ‘become a true space-faring civilization’? While I don’t deny that scientific research is serendipitous, Musk’s vision seems like a vanity project unlikely to show practical benefits in either the near or long term.
Boru
I don't suppose we do but we will be extremely limited if we don't.
Musk's vision has already shown practical benefits. Falcon 9 is a major advance over previous rockets. A practical orbital system where the booster is routinely and reliably reused at economic benefit is something most engineers thought impossible. When starship is operational, it will reduce the cost of lifting heavy loads to orbit ten-fold.
I wasn’t clear. It’s unlikely to show any practical, non-space travel related benefits. Unlike the Mercury, Gemini, and Apollo programmes - all of which generated massive spinoff technologies - SpaceX is only benefiting manned spaceflight. Something I’m not a fan of.
Boru
‘I can’t be having with this.’ - Esmeralda Weatherwax
|