Posts: 43162
Threads: 720
Joined: September 21, 2008
Reputation:
132
RE: Gay Marriage: Our Mutual Joy
March 7, 2009 at 6:14 am
Lol. I don't see anything wrong with your reply there fr0d0 (I'm referring to the getting back in the cage).
You just responded to rockpiano.
EvF
Posts: 43162
Threads: 720
Joined: September 21, 2008
Reputation:
132
RE: Gay Marriage: Our Mutual Joy
March 8, 2009 at 7:26 pm
Marriage doesn't really do much apart from the legal differences yeah?
You can totally love someone and not marry them, - and you can hardly love someone and marry them for instance.
I mean, right?
EvF
Posts: 1694
Threads: 24
Joined: August 28, 2008
Reputation:
22
RE: Gay Marriage: Our Mutual Joy
March 9, 2009 at 11:51 am
I agree EvF marriage is just a legality but the only reason it's an issue here in the states especially is because marriage is considered a christian institution established by the Judaeo christian god in the Old Testament.Otherwise I beleive it would not even be an issue.You are right meatball marriage and gay relationships are two different issues but these two issues overlap each other so they really cant be separated.
Rockthatpiano christians are notorious to only take on challenges that would end in their benefit.Separation of church and state is not one of them since if it was up to them they would love nothing short of a theocracy.They would love the opportunity to stuff their beliefs down the worlds throats by force the way they did during the various inquisitions and the crusades.
Posts: 48
Threads: 2
Joined: March 3, 2009
Reputation:
2
RE: Gay Marriage: Our Mutual Joy
March 9, 2009 at 9:44 pm
(This post was last modified: March 9, 2009 at 9:57 pm by Mark.)
For me, homosexual marriage is a civil rights issue, and therefore it is one that admits no compromise. It is just the same with polygamy, polyandry and various other imaginable principles of household constitution. Persons should be free to join in whatever familial associations they desire, and the laws should be sufficiently flexible to support inheritance, shared property, medical visitation and the like, irrespective of mode of household constitution. If God exists and has strong preferences in this regard, the state can do nothing supplant his divine law. But the state can establish practical and legal institutions, whether God likes it or not, and according to republican principles, it should. It is not for the state to be the guarantor, still less the enforcer, of anyone's supposedly God-inspired notions of how people should behave. Their strong effort to establish the contrary is one of the principal evils of the Roman Church and in America, of the Conference of Catholic Bishops.
@chatpilot: "Judeo-Christian" is a conservative political construction and does not describe anything objective in American society. Nobody worships Judeo-Christ, so far as I am aware. Judaism and Christianity are two different religions, and "Judeo-Christian" is merely an attempt to create a reactionary consensus that includes members of both. When it comes to that, Islam is also strongly a religion of "the Book," in many ways more consistent and broadly inclusive than either of the others, and the only reason we do not see "Judeo-Christian-Islamic" is that Jews and conservative Christians revile Islam.
Posts: 1694
Threads: 24
Joined: August 28, 2008
Reputation:
22
RE: Gay Marriage: Our Mutual Joy
March 10, 2009 at 11:05 am
Everyone knows that Christianity is derived from Judaism.They claim the same god Jehova and Jesus is supposed to be an incarnation of that god.These two religions overlap each other as well since christians still hold to some Old Testament laws described in the Pentateuch.