Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: February 4, 2025, 1:04 am

Poll: Are there any problems with atheism?
This poll is closed.
There are no problems with atheism
82.76%
24 82.76%
There are some problems with atheism
17.24%
5 17.24%
Total 29 vote(s) 100%
* You voted for this item. [Show Results]

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
No problems with atheism then...
RE: No problems with atheism then...
Pad, as far as zero being difficult to understand. Zero as part of a system of arithmetic is one thing, but having nothing in your hand as opposed to something. Pretty easy. How many ears of corn in your right hand roman farmer? 2, and your left? none. They understood a concept of 0, it just hadn't been found to be useful for arithmetic at that point, or called Zero.
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!
Reply
RE: No problems with atheism then...
(August 23, 2011 at 12:09 am)Rhythm Wrote: The duality of 0? That's idiotic. Every breath you draw to squeeze out thoughts like this is stolen from a worthwhile thought in someone else's head.

Very poetic.

What existed before the Big bang?
Reply
RE: No problems with atheism then...
(August 23, 2011 at 5:38 am)Godnose Wrote: What existed before the Big bang?

A tough question with no definite answer. But, you can expand your knowledge on this from here, at least.

Reply
RE: No problems with atheism then...
(August 23, 2011 at 6:18 am)Rayaan Wrote:
(August 23, 2011 at 5:38 am)Godnose Wrote: What existed before the Big bang?

A tough question with no definite answer. But, you can expand your knowledge on this from here, at least.

I tried that already. No luck! Plus even went a few years back to listen to SH about it here in Embra, and even he didn't have a clue*. But, er, my question was intended to relate to the zero question.

A bit too lateral I guess - particularly for you literal types.

I feel the urge to expand - can't help it. OK ... According to my understanding time (and space) starts at the Big Bang, so actually there is no such thing as "before" the Big Bang, because "before" implies a passage of time and, as I said, time started AT the Big Bang. The answer I was hoping for of course was "Nothing" or "The Void". Then I'd be able to say "Nope", because there weren't even any concepts then - in fact there wasn't even any "then". So that's yet another kind of zero. So now we have three types of zero, all with rather different qualities from each other:

Normal zero (or perhaps "rational" zero is better) ... eg: 1-1, 2-2, 2-1-1, -20+10+5+10-5, etc

Unimaginary zero (or should that be "imaginary zero"?) ... The "thing" to be quantified does not even exist (eg: Vladimarusk the Tamalin - you can't have 1-1 of them if the "them" has never existed).
Voidal zero. ... The kind of zero that exists (or rather doesn't exist) only because there is no context for it to exist within. Wink Shades

Sh1t! Just thought of another one. OK - here goes. The Big Bang is an explosion right, and we are still living in it (the expanding universe!). So, if it's expanding it must have an edge, and if it has an edge then what is beyond that edge? OK, if you follow that through then you probably get to pretty much the same sort of thing as with the Voidal zero, yes? Nope! Because, of the scale. Think about it. The Voidal zero, by definition, is a tiny wee thing, well less than a tiny wee thing really, whereas the one at the edge of the universe is Big. Very very Big. it has to be, because it is "outside" the universe. So, that's my fourth zero:

Big Zero ... like the Voidal Zero, but Very Very Big.
________________________________________________________________
*Actually have to moderate that a bit, not really fair to say SH didn't have a "clue". But only clues, or surmises, no definite facts. Because it's beyond the event horizon... phew! I think I need some solace!
Reply
RE: No problems with atheism then...
Sorry - got confused (duplicated post somehow)
Reply
RE: No problems with atheism then...
That's ok, old son: It keeps you right where we expect you to be.
Trying to update my sig ...
Reply
RE: No problems with atheism then...
(August 23, 2011 at 6:41 am)Godnose Wrote: I feel the urge to expand - can't help it. OK ... According to my understanding time (and space) starts at the Big Bang, so actually there is no such thing as "before" the Big Bang, because "before" implies a passage of time and, as I said, time started AT the Big Bang. The answer I was hoping for of course was "Nothing" or "The Void". Then I'd be able to say "Nope", because there weren't even any concepts then - in fact there wasn't even any "then". So that's yet another kind of zero.

You can't possibly know that there was no "before" the big bang. Just because the way we perceive our time doesn't mean that there wasn't some equivalent or some kind of different time before that that.

I am not necessarily disagreeing with you, but it seems like you are claiming to know that this is so. Which makes you no better than the religious creeps who claim to know God's personality.
Cunt
Reply
RE: No problems with atheism then...
(August 22, 2011 at 7:16 pm)Minimalist Wrote: I'd say that the numerical value of zero is a snap when compared to the mental gyrations needed to come to the conclusion that 3 = 1.

Don't believe 3 = 1 can be done mentally. It has to be physical. Like as to Winston Smith in 1984.
(August 23, 2011 at 7:58 am)frankiej Wrote:
(August 23, 2011 at 6:41 am)Godnose Wrote: I feel the urge to expand - can't help it. OK ... According to my understanding time (and space) starts at the Big Bang, so actually there is no such thing as "before" the Big Bang, because "before" implies a passage of time and, as I said, time started AT the Big Bang. The answer I was hoping for of course was "Nothing" or "The Void". Then I'd be able to say "Nope", because there weren't even any concepts then - in fact there wasn't even any "then". So that's yet another kind of zero.

You can't possibly know that there was no "before" the big bang. Just because the way we perceive our time doesn't mean that there wasn't some equivalent or some kind of different time before that that.

I am not necessarily disagreeing with you, but it seems like you are claiming to know that this is so. Which makes you no better than the religious creeps who claim to know God's personality.

Sorry, that's my understanding - gained both from reading A Brief History of Time and reinforced by the author himself in Edinburgh a few years ago.
Reply
RE: No problems with atheism then...
Yes, but you can't KNOW this for sure, yet you talk like you do. It doesn't matter if it is your understanding, it is rather ignorant to argue the way you are.
Cunt
Reply
RE: No problems with atheism then...
(August 23, 2011 at 5:38 am)Godnose Wrote: What existed before the Big bang?

Theoretically nothing because all of the mass in the universe was contained in one minute point known as a singularity.

The concept of "before" is reliant on the construct of time. Time only became a factor as the universe expanded from this singularity.

In essence the question is ultimately flawed.
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  If God doesnt exist. Then why is Momoko from Ghost Stories Eng Dub so cute RichieSmall 0 170 December 21, 2024 at 12:16 am
Last Post: RichieSmall
  If you're really a spektic then explain this: jasonstackhouse 142 13908 February 24, 2024 at 7:28 pm
Last Post: BrianSoddingBoru4
  Atheists, if God doesnt exist, then explain why Keanu Reeves looks like Jesus Christ Frakki 9 1700 April 1, 2023 at 4:07 am
Last Post: Goosebump
  No soul? No free will and no responsibility then, yet the latter's essential... Duty 33 5403 August 26, 2020 at 4:35 pm
Last Post: HappySkeptic
  [Serious] When God isn't the answer to the question, then what is? Catharsis 55 8691 May 31, 2019 at 1:38 pm
Last Post: SlowCalculations
  Atheism VS Christian Atheism? IanHulett 80 30656 June 13, 2017 at 11:09 am
Last Post: vorlon13
  Serious Problems with Atheism Pulse 300 33485 January 29, 2017 at 4:22 am
Last Post: maestroanth
Video Problems With the Bible pt 8 - Jonah and the Whale Mental Outlaw 0 908 July 26, 2015 at 11:38 am
Last Post: Mental Outlaw
  The Problems with Heaven (besides not existing) Mental Outlaw 0 1194 July 10, 2015 at 10:13 pm
Last Post: Mental Outlaw
Video Problems With the Bible Pt 7 - Moses Mental Outlaw 4 1644 May 24, 2015 at 4:58 pm
Last Post: Minimalist



Users browsing this thread: 27 Guest(s)