Adam and Eve impossible

[coffeeveritas]

[Minimalist]

so arguing for two literal people doesn't even make sense in terms of the Bible.

You can always tell a fundie, but you cannot tell him much, Coffee.

[Cinjin]

Many people here are irritated I believe in God, it's my assumption that you may be disappointed if your children love something they can't see.

I have a momentary rant that I need to unleash for just a moment ...

Where in the holy hell do you get your information? You should log off this site, go read non-stop for a month and then come back here. Don't listen to your idiot pastor. Don't believe the propaganda you soak in every Sunday. Research for yourself and completely stop assuming. You forget that many of us were once Christians and we have researched long and hard on this subject and there are very good odds that many of us know far more than you do about your Book of Lies.

You honestly do think that we are irritated because you believe in god?!! No one here cares that you or Statler or any other of the brothers-in-christ believe in the christian god - or any other for that matter. I believe in God. My atheists friends don't respect it, but they are not irritated by me.

What is irritating to atheists (and all the non-sheep) is the utterly ridiculous excuses, and the complete disregard for proven science, and your ability to simply ignore all the many parts of the Bible that you simply don't understand and can't explain. Many of your posts are infuriating simply because you have not taken the time to research information for yourself. You say you want to learn. You say you want to understand. You want the truth? Stop getting all your information from a biased religious source. It's bull shit. You want to understand biology, science and evolution - don't go hunting information down from your youth pastor's wife!
Hey everybody, I've studied theology. Whoopdy shit ... I have my whole damn life.

Stop insulting us with your ignorance and get educated on who and what we are. Admittedly you have a far better attitude than some of the other theists we have in here, but don't think for a moment that we haven't heard every single response you've made 1000 times before.


... I really could go on an on, cause I'm revved up for some reason, but I'm ending my rant here. It's just that your last 5 pages of responses have just been mostly idiocy and excuses.

[coffeeveritas]

so arguing for two literal people doesn't even make sense in terms of the Bible.

You can always tell a fundie, but you cannot tell him much, Coffee.

Haha! You know the funny thing about fundies is that fundamentalists get their name from a series of books called "The Fundamentals." The books basically outline what a fundamentalist should believe and it's really where the fundamentalist movement started. The funny thing is, one of those books in "The Fundamentals" series is actually an essay on how evolution is true and does not conflict with the Bible. Evolution is in their roots.

So in order for someone to truly be a good fundamentalist, they should vigorously defend evolution.

[Justtristo]

so arguing for two literal people doesn't even make sense in terms of the Bible.

You can always tell a fundie, but you cannot tell him much, Coffee.

Haha! You know the funny thing about fundies is that fundamentalists get their name from a series of books called "The Fundamentals." The books basically outline what a fundamentalist should believe and it's really where the fundamentalist movement started. The funny thing is, one of those books in "The Fundamentals" series is actually an essay on how evolution is true and does not conflict with the Bible. Evolution is in their roots.

So in order for someone to truly be a good fundamentalist, they should vigorously defend evolution.

I bet most of them don't know that modern "creation science" originated with a Seven Day Adventist. For some reason the SDA's are considered a bit iffy by other Evangelicals.

[The Grand Nudger]

Failed end of the world predictions will do that. Nobodies as flaky as the guy claiming the immenant return of christ for 170 years. Stretches the meaning of the word and our ability to trust them when they use it.
(Pro Tip: SDA felt that by "correcting" church doctrine they were facilitating the coming of christ, similar to starting the timer on a bomb)

[coffeeveritas]

so arguing for two literal people doesn't even make sense in terms of the Bible.

You can always tell a fundie, but you cannot tell him much, Coffee.

Haha! You know the funny thing about fundies is that fundamentalists get their name from a series of books called "The Fundamentals." The books basically outline what a fundamentalist should believe and it's really where the fundamentalist movement started. The funny thing is, one of those books in "The Fundamentals" series is actually an essay on how evolution is true and does not conflict with the Bible. Evolution is in their roots.

So in order for someone to truly be a good fundamentalist, they should vigorously defend evolution.

I bet most of them don't know that modern "creation science" originated with a Seven Day Adventist. For some reason the SDA's are considered a bit iffy by other Evangelicals.

Yeah, there's apparently a group of Christians that ranks denominations based on how good their doctrine is. The Seven Day Adventists got a C-, it's the lowest grade you can get and still be considered a Christian group. Didn't know there was a report card for this kind of stuff, but there you go.

[Minimalist]

Seeing as how the 7th Day Adventists are the remnants of the Millerites of "Great Disappointment" fame I can kind of see that.

[The Grand Nudger]

Burnt Over Belt ftw. You know my family ended up with a decent chunk of land from all of that. Nothing like river bottom at rock bottom prices.

[ThomM]

[/quote]

I bet most of them don't know that modern "creation science" originated with a Seven Day Adventist. For some reason the SDA's are considered a bit iffy by other Evangelicals.
[/quote]

THERE is no such thing as creation science - that has already been established by the courts in the US

Creation is religious MYTH - since it is based on the fairy tales of genesis that are already PROVEN not to be true