Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: August 18, 2022, 7:44 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
A question
RE: A question
(October 5, 2011 at 11:38 pm)Statler Waldorf Wrote: Shell, googling me was not what was inappropriate, I understand why that had to be done. Using the information you found to supposedly “call me out” is what is grossly inappropriate. I was given full assurance that information would only be used to resolve that one issue. It obviously was not, that’s a serious problem.

I really figured you would single me out. That doesn't make it any less unreasonable. While I completely agree that someone had to call you out, I wasn't the one who did it. I am utterly amused, though.

Quote:No you don’t, that would mean you would know what job I hold and how long I have worked there, but since you claim I was lying about all that then you can’t also claim to know how much I make. Bummer.

Oh, yes. I forgot that I was dealing with a weirdo. Either way, I am not interested in stealing your identity or even so much as revealing it.
Reply
RE: A question
you made up your wife Confusedhock: she would be so ashamed
Reply
RE: A question
So, dilemmas .... which name should I use? I'd really prefer to use the one that most represents the REAL you.
[Image: Evolution.png]

Reply
RE: A question
(October 5, 2011 at 11:41 pm)Shell B Wrote: While I completely agree that someone had to call you out, I wasn't the one who did it. I am utterly amused, though.

Yeah call me out for meeting my wife online...ooooooooo!!! Scary stuff. Nothing I have said on here has been a lie, hence why you have been completely incapable of proving otherwise.

(October 5, 2011 at 11:47 pm)cdog Wrote: you made up your wife Confusedhock: she would be so ashamed

Lol, no I met her online, crazy huh? She is quite real, I assure you.

[Image: zksjet.jpg]
Reply
RE: A question
(October 6, 2011 at 12:18 am)Statler Waldorf Wrote: Lol, no I met her online, crazy huh? She is quite real, I assure you.

Pardon my skepticism, in light of your pathological lying and evasiveness, then.
Slave to the Patriarchy no more
Reply
RE: A question
(October 6, 2011 at 2:24 am)Moros Synackaon Wrote:
(October 6, 2011 at 12:18 am)Statler Waldorf Wrote: Lol, no I met her online, crazy huh? She is quite real, I assure you.

Pardon my skepticism, in light of your pathological lying and evasiveness, then.

Unless you can prove I have lied about anything I suggest you yourself need to stop being dishonest by bearing false witness. Fair minded people see it for what it really is, an attempt to discredit someone you have trouble keeping up with in rational debate.
[Image: zksjet.jpg]
Reply
RE: A question
(October 6, 2011 at 3:05 am)Statler Waldorf Wrote: Fair minded people see it for what it really is, an attempt to discredit someone you have trouble keeping up with in rational debate.

Is that what you have come up with? Honestly, Stat, it would be much easier to get along with you, and trust you, if your hubris wasn't your most obvious quality. You respond to accusations of dishonesty by essentially saying, "Nah, nah, you're just saying that because I'm way smarter than you."

In absolute sincerity, I think your personality needs work. I'm certain mine does too, so you can spare me the retort. I think the difference is that I care to at least attempt to be fair-minded and truly rational. Your idea of rational is saying what you believe to be true and calling everyone who refutes it irrational. It's like a child holding up a vanilla ice cream cone, declaring it chocolate and bullying all of the other kids who say it is not. That is not to say you are always wrong, but your people skills are poor, at best. You would probably say the same about me because, to be frank, I don't go out of my way to be polite with you, as I would someone else. However, I see you that way with literally every person who is not a Christian.

I can't speak for Syn, but the only reason I don't like debating with you is because you assert knowledge about things of which you know nothing. You change definitions proudly and without apology. You move goalposts like it is your job. Now, please don't bother arguing it. These are my observations. Perhaps you will take a step back and learn to be humble. Actually listen to other points of view. Try to see how someone else could come to a different conclusion.

All of that being said, I'm still not entirely sure of you. Whether you are lying or not, you give enough cause for one to believe it. You are pimping yourself. Why, I am not sure.
Reply
RE: A question
I would like to point out (as both a Computer Science and Information Security major) that browser cookies do not work in the way Statler wants you to think they do. I think he knows this; he just expects most of you not to. Neither do registry entries have anything to do with independent HTTP requests to dating sites (or any site for that matter).

Browsers do not make HTTP requests for you. They only do it when you tell them to (i.e. you type in a URL or click on a link).
Reply
RE: A question
(October 6, 2011 at 3:20 am)Shell B Wrote: I'm still not entirely sure of you. Whether you are lying or not, you give enough cause for one to believe it. You are pimping yourself. Why, I am not sure.

Pimping myself? You see, that still bothers me because you can’t possibly know that to be true. Even if I logged into dating sites everyday, which I don’t, but even if I did that in no way proves I even communicate with anyone, that just means I log into them. It was funny, shortly after we got married we logged into my wife’s old account to save some of our emails we had sent back and forth. Now to an outsider this may appear my wife was “pimping herself out”, but of course she wasn’t because we had a perfectly legitimate reason to log into the site. So I just feel you are jumping to conclusions that are unfounded. My wife knows I have old profiles, she knows that they are not active anymore and has no issues with them. I love my wife and she loves me, life is good.

As to the rest of your response, it was a bit harsh and from my point of view a lot of it also applies to you and other posters on here but I will do my best to take it to heart and wok on it.

[Image: zksjet.jpg]
Reply
RE: A question
Stat, a lot of it does apply to me. The difference is that I am utterly aware of my flaws.
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  I have a homosexual question and incest question? KingKong 39 7310 July 6, 2014 at 1:38 am
Last Post: Amalynne0
  "Answer the Question with a Question" Game Rayaan 101 15607 August 14, 2012 at 6:28 am
Last Post: Rayaan



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)