Posts: 1571
Threads: 179
Joined: October 14, 2010
Reputation:
35
RE: Giza pyramids
November 10, 2011 at 6:04 pm
(This post was last modified: November 10, 2011 at 6:09 pm by orogenicman.)
'The difference between a Miracle and a Fact is exactly the difference between a mermaid and seal. It could not be expressed better.'
-- Samuel "Mark Twain" Clemens
"I think that in the discussion of natural problems we ought to begin not with the scriptures, but with experiments, demonstrations, and observations".
- Galileo Galilei (1564-1642)
"In short, Meyer has shown that his first disastrous book was not a fluke: he is capable of going into any field in which he has no training or research experience and botching it just as badly as he did molecular biology. As I've written before, if you are a complete amateur and don't understand a subject, don't demonstrate the Dunning-Kruger effect by writing a book about it and proving your ignorance to everyone else! "
- Dr. Donald Prothero
Posts: 7388
Threads: 168
Joined: February 25, 2009
Reputation:
45
RE: Giza pyramids
November 10, 2011 at 6:15 pm
(November 10, 2011 at 1:11 pm) Howevr,i'l believit wehniseeit.'binny Wrote: Why on earth would someone want to do this? I don't get it.
I don't either,and don't believe it for a second.
The cost would run into billions,and for what,curiosity? I don't think so.
I'll believe it when I see it.
Posts: 69246
Threads: 3759
Joined: August 2, 2009
Reputation:
258
RE: Giza pyramids
November 11, 2011 at 12:57 pm
Quote:In addition, it has been determined unambiguously where the stones came from (they came from the quarry that is located behind the pyramids, a quarry that was not discovered until relatively recently because it had been infilled with the rubble that was used to make the ramps used to place the stones in their respective positions).
Correct. One of the problems with the Japanese tests was that they were assuming the stones were brought in by boat. They found that off loading them up the muddy banks was an impossibility. The discovery of the quarries solves that problem. BUT, the Tura limestone which was used for the casing blocks did come from the east side of the Nile which raises the loading/unloading question again and the huge granite blocks from the inner chambers came from Aswan, far up river. This could all be resolved if there were some sort of harbor/roadway built to facilitate the loading process. All we have to do is find the harbors/roads. Egyptians do not seem to have been big on building either but one cannot rule out the possibility.
Quote:So it is not unreasonable to assume that they were working long hours with little interruption
Agreed, I would accept from dawn to dusk but you still lose on average half the day that way. And it still complicates the math of placing the blocks in the 20 year time frame.
Quote:It has been suggested that the stones were moved using manual human labor, but others have shown that pack animals such as camels and possibly oxen, likely had a major hand in it as well.
Oxen are depicted in tomb art for the Old Kingdom so that is possible but archaeologists have determined that camels were not domesticated until the first millenium.... which upsets the fundies endlessly because they do so want their "Abraham" to have been a camel jockey. We have no representations of pyramid building in Egyptian art. We do have a carving of a New Kingdom obelisk being pulled on a sled by manual labor. More than that is speculation. We have no evidence.
Quote:Finally, the limestone that was used to make the pyramids was relatively soft and so wasn't as hard to process as some have suggested.
Absolutely true, but what is equally true is that their copper tools were soft too. I've seen demonstrations in documentaries of smoothing limestone blocks with hand tools ( even flint scrapers were used) and it does work. But it took a long time to do and it is precision work. And there is no way in hell that you get that kind of performance when it comes to copper tools on the harder stone.
Lastly, there is still the mystery of the ramp system which one engineer called a project even more massive than the pyramid itself. I have a thought but without evidence it is no more valid than the spaceman idea.
Posts: 19789
Threads: 57
Joined: September 24, 2010
Reputation:
85
RE: Giza pyramids
November 11, 2011 at 1:37 pm
(This post was last modified: November 11, 2011 at 1:40 pm by Anomalocaris.)
The Egyptians built more than one canal to connect the nile and the red sea, so I would not be surprised if they built a canal from the Nile to a jetty at the base of each pyramid to facilitate movement of the stones. As to any ramp, I suspect any reasonable efficient technique to build the pyramids must either incoroporate the ramps directly into the structure of the pyramids, ie the unfinished structure of parts of the pyramid acts as ramp for moving material to other parts, or the ramp must be so constructed such that large portion of their material will gradually be dismantled and incorporated into the pyramid as the pyramid is finished.
As to smoothing and polishing casing stones, I wonder if roughly shaped lime stone blocks were primarily not polished with tools, but we're polished against each other? Perhaps roughly shaped blocks were first used as a sort of paving stone, with other similar sized blocks secured by wooden frames and dragged over them, so that stone polish themselves against each other as they are moved to the pyramid and up it's sides?
As this process occurs, the stone flour that would result from stones grounding against each other, when wetted with water, would make a very efficient polishing compound, capable making an almost mirror finish to the stones, as demonstrated by the glacial polish the one finds where glaciers have receded from the stones they polished.
Posts: 69246
Threads: 3759
Joined: August 2, 2009
Reputation:
258
RE: Giza pyramids
November 11, 2011 at 1:59 pm
Quote:I suspect any reasonable efficient technique to build the pyramids must either incoroporate the ramps directly into the structure of the pyramids,
That's pretty much what I see and the problem is obvious. It erases the evidence of its use on the way down. That way, you don't have to build a big ramp, merely a ramp from one course of masonry to the next.
Posts: 39
Threads: 5
Joined: November 5, 2011
Reputation:
0
RE: Giza pyramids
November 11, 2011 at 5:18 pm
I'm looking for a link that says that the egyptians supposedly used copper tools to cut through granite, but that granite can't be cut with such a metal. I don't know if anyone here is familiar with this.
Posts: 69246
Threads: 3759
Joined: August 2, 2009
Reputation:
258
RE: Giza pyramids
November 11, 2011 at 5:36 pm
(This post was last modified: November 11, 2011 at 5:45 pm by Minimalist.)
Posts: 2966
Threads: 124
Joined: May 12, 2011
Reputation:
30
RE: Giza pyramids
November 11, 2011 at 6:01 pm
(November 10, 2011 at 2:15 pm)thesummerqueen Wrote: Heh. If they do, the Jews would FINALLY have a legitimate claim to their kvetching! I'm all for it!
That's when I'll finally change my religious views to "atheist."
And we'd feel so privileged
Posts: 69246
Threads: 3759
Joined: August 2, 2009
Reputation:
258
RE: Giza pyramids
November 11, 2011 at 6:57 pm
Quote:So they put slave masters over them to oppress them with forced labor, and they built Pithom and Rameses as store cities for Pharaoh.
Ex 1:11
More shit that they didn't do, either.
Posts: 1571
Threads: 179
Joined: October 14, 2010
Reputation:
35
RE: Giza pyramids
November 11, 2011 at 7:33 pm
minimalist Wrote:Agreed, I would accept from dawn to dusk but you still lose on average half the day that way. And it still complicates the math of placing the blocks in the 20 year time frame.
It all boils down to manpower. The pyramids were the Apollo moon shot of their day,and I have no doubt that people came from far and wide to work on them.
'The difference between a Miracle and a Fact is exactly the difference between a mermaid and seal. It could not be expressed better.'
-- Samuel "Mark Twain" Clemens
"I think that in the discussion of natural problems we ought to begin not with the scriptures, but with experiments, demonstrations, and observations".
- Galileo Galilei (1564-1642)
"In short, Meyer has shown that his first disastrous book was not a fluke: he is capable of going into any field in which he has no training or research experience and botching it just as badly as he did molecular biology. As I've written before, if you are a complete amateur and don't understand a subject, don't demonstrate the Dunning-Kruger effect by writing a book about it and proving your ignorance to everyone else! "
- Dr. Donald Prothero
|