What are the evidence for no god?

[abaris]

No, it's as beccs said. No fairies or pink elephants. Would be ridiculous to believe in them. But a superior supernatural world creator, no problem. Why can't everybody see the logic?

[I_am_not_mafia]

If matter can be neither created nor destroyed then you don't need to make something out of nothing. It means that the universe has always existed. The Big Bang was just one particular state and we do not know what happened before the Big Bang.


How did this being start it all if it cannot create energy or matter?

You can't create energy or matter so therefore what you call as this being has always existed. 

Why is there a need for an extra being or god when it cannot create or destroy energy or matter and the universe has always existed?

[Edwardo Piet]

Blondie, nature doesn't "have a use" for anything... nature just is... the other monkeys and apes that are around have merely survived and are reproducing and aren't extinct yet.... that's all it is. Most life has gone extinct.... nature doesn't need a reason to keep any life around, it is merely that the creatures that can't survive become extinct and we're left with the ones that can survive... although these species may become extinct in the end. In fact all life may become extinct in the end, including us.

According to the naturalistic view there is no purpose, it's just what is left, it's the process of elimination, it's natural selection.

It makes no sense to say other apes and monkeys have no reason to be around now that we are around: We don't have a reason to be around either. Us, and monkeys, and other apes and all other life is just around because it has survived and reproduced and isn't extinct, at least not yet.

[The Valkyrie]

Blondie. If you truly believe that about evolution then I suggest you go and read some actual science literature on the subject. Not nonsense from creationist websites that you are repeating but REAL science from actual scientists.

[Edwardo Piet]

This "Micro" and "macro" evolution is all creationist bullshit.

There is only micro evolution... over millions and millions of years.

[Thumpalumpacus]

Stimbo

Yeah you first.  Where is your missing link for macro evolution?  Why are there still monkeys?  Wouldn't all monkeys be extinct since they have no use on earth anymore since their human counter parts are here?    Gravity exist.  Please show me I am at least communicating to a half way intelligent person.

Yeah, you're getting my bill for a new irony meter.

If that is what you want to do.  For evolution to be possible, all monkeys, gorillas, etc would be extinct.  Mother nature as atheists would say would no longer have  any use for these creatures.  My self image is that I am a more supreme being than monkeys so no I did not evolve from monkeys.  So therefore macro-evolution is bullcrap.  Micro-evolution, however, I will go along with because every creature adapts to its environment. 

Men re-write religion to suit their needs.  Hence the different splits of religions.

With every post you belie your ignorance. Do get started on your education soon. I feel embarrassed for you.

[I_am_not_mafia]

For evolution to be possible, all monkeys, gorillas, etc would be extinct.  Mother nature as atheists would say would no longer have  any use for these creatures.  My self image is that I am a more supreme being than monkeys so no I did not evolve from monkeys.  So therefore macro-evolution is bullcrap.  Micro-evolution, however, I will go along with because every creature adapts to its environment. 

It has been explained to you in many, many posts now why this is wrong and you keep saying the same thing. This clear evidence that you have no interest in learning or listening to what other people say.

How many times now have people told you have humans did not evolve from monkeys but both evolved from a common ancestor?

You do not explain why monkeys and gorillas have to be extinct if evolution is true.

You ignored my post saying that there is no difference between 'macro-evolution' and 'micro-evolution'. Scientists do not make the distinction between the two. Evolution requires many small changes that accumulate to make big changes over time.

If you believe in micro-evolution then you believe in evolution.

[Blondie]

If the account of Noah's flood isn't true, then how is it possible that we have found Noah's Ark split up into three pieces?

It isn't true, nor have we found any ark split into pieces.

If you're going to make extraordinary claims like this, you need to support them with reputable sources.

Here it is, but you are not going to watch it.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sawWSvHjqEE


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uPRo7Q-7yQQ

[I_am_not_mafia]

apparently I have missed something or public schooling has failed to do their jobs.

Public schooling did not fail you. You failed the teachers trying to educate you. As you later admitted:

You are so the fruits of an American education. So tell me did you just switch off your brain when they taught science or just ignore it and hope it went away.

I didn't want to be fed your propaganda.  I wasn't in the mood the the atheist propaganda you are selling.

[Edwardo Piet]

Blondie is soooooo projecting there! Our atheist propaganda? And he/she is dropping creationist bullshit videos about the 'ark' and going on about 'micro' and 'macro' evolution when those are creationist only terms? If there's any 'propaganda' here it's the indoctrinated creationist bullshit like that being spread around.