Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: June 14, 2024, 11:42 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Scientific knowledge versus spiritual knowledge
RE: Scientific knowledge versus spiritual knowledge
(January 8, 2016 at 3:55 pm)Brian37 Wrote:
(January 8, 2016 at 11:21 am)MysticKnight Wrote: What religions claim that? I am not aware of any, so perhaps you can inform me which ones make this claim. I understand the poetic exaggeration so I'm not taking it literally. Which religion claimed people can't be empathetic, loving to one another, good to their parents, respecting to one another, have good manners etc, without religious guidance?

Again, you need to learn the difference between what religion claims, and what it actually produces in reality. The kind motifs religions like to claim, in reality can be done without religion. The empathy as religion sells is not set up to be universal, although it does claim that. The empathy religion sets up in reality is tribal and at best "separate but equal" or is fine with others being a pet our house guest. That is empathy for the tribe, not empathy for all of humanity. The love for outsiders as depicted back then is conditional.

The God/s of Abraham are tribal characters because back when all three of those books were written, humans lived in feudal times and back then the mortality rate was much higher and it was extremely important for your own survival to tow the tribal line. So the love of others back then was for the tribe, those three holy books describe very violent revenge to anyone attacking the tribe. The obeying your parents were not because you were seen as an individual, you obeyed your parents because you were their property. 

Those books put you down even before you are born, teach you to assume the worst and only the sky boss can save you from the game he didn't have to set up. He blames you for the conditions he didnt have to put in place. Those books teach you to kill for the tribe. No, that is not the way the religious in the civil west like to view it, but again, those books were not written with our modern values in mind.

Religious people don't claim those things no, but they are totally unaware of how their false perceptions lead to bad actions. "Sin" is the concept that you are a piece of shit and are doomed to fail even before you do anything wrong. 

Robvalue is right. Religion convinces people they are nothing without it. The truth is if you have to live under promise of reward or threat of punishment, that is a very childlike and ignorant form of regulation. It is immoral to treat an adult as if they need a sky parent. As immoral as Kim Jong Un who will treat you well if you obey and "respect him". Doing the right thing is doing it even when nobody is watching and you don't get rewarded.

If someone needs bribes or threats to self regulate, by all means do it. But to expect others who do the same and do so without threats or bribes is vile. I am an adult and I don't need a sky parent watching me every second of my life or bullying me with threats of hell to do the right thing. And I don't need someone to dangle a cookie in front of me either.
Following what is right within your existence is beneficial to All existence, unless you seek reward.

Any, truly faithful to the One Creator GOD will not act out of greed, as they despise it.

Different times indeed called for different law. And if the law was wholly interpreted and documented without fault then there would have never been a need for the New covenant. Even that though, was intentionally misinterpreted by those who raised to power by force at that time(wholly against the truth of scriptures).

The next testament, or rather universal understanding of the will of GOD without the twisted manipulations of greedy, power hungry man secretly rooted in sin, is indeed needed. And will come. Atheist are not excluded, but rather needed in a way I think. They can grasp universal altruism more readily than most religious. They can also, through honest introspection, begin to grasp the concept of not only the conscience based around what you want, but the selfless conscience. These things, over time with perseverance, I think, will help many. Stepping out of the cycle that society(man) has made for us is also key.

I think many atheist easily have the potential to grasp and attain such things, and as such, perhaps learn of other things for the sake of profitable existence for all(and by profitable I mean like well-being, not money, or greed in any way)

Sorry may be ranting.

Peace



Faith in selfless Unity for Good.
Reply



Messages In This Thread
RE: Scientific knowledge versus spiritual knowledge - by popsthebuilder - January 8, 2016 at 9:03 pm

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Fine Tuning Principle: Devastating Disproof and Scientific Refutation of Atheism. Nishant Xavier 97 7746 September 20, 2023 at 1:31 pm
Last Post: Foxaèr
  Using the word Spiritual Bahana 44 3948 October 4, 2018 at 9:24 pm
Last Post: Lek
  Are there any scientific books or studies that explain what makes a person religious? WisdomOfTheTrees 13 2683 February 9, 2017 at 2:33 am
Last Post: Mirek-Polska
  Is atheism a scientific perspective? AAA 358 62766 January 27, 2017 at 7:49 pm
Last Post: brewer
  Theist ➤ Why ☠ Evolution is not Scientific ✔ The Joker 348 48271 November 26, 2016 at 11:47 pm
Last Post: Amarok
  Cartoons: propaganda versus the giant gorilla Deepthunk 4 1896 October 19, 2015 at 2:33 pm
Last Post: Deepthunk
  Jerry Coyne's new book: Faith Versus Fact Mudhammam 17 6038 August 13, 2015 at 12:22 am
Last Post: smsavage32
  Help: jumped on for seeking scientific proof of spiritual healing emilynghiem 55 18094 February 21, 2015 at 2:54 am
Last Post: JesusHChrist
  Atheism, Scientific Atheism and Antitheism tantric 33 12733 January 18, 2015 at 1:05 pm
Last Post: helyott
  A question about the lifespan of scientific theories. Hammod1612 35 7277 January 16, 2015 at 5:15 am
Last Post: Alex K



Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)