Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: June 15, 2024, 5:46 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
A question about the lifespan of scientific theories.
#8
RE: A question about the lifespan of scientific theories.
(January 11, 2015 at 8:12 pm)Hammod1612 Wrote: A quick question to all of the people holding the facts out there:
I'm personally an Atheist, and was recently in a discussion with my Christian friend about God, evolution and so forth.
A thing that bugged me a bit was one of her "facts," which i could not really comment upon since i didn't have the knowledge about it.
Her argument was, that religion had lasted for thousands of years, and apparently (according to her "facts"), scientific theories have an average "lifespan" of about 30 years. Now i know for a fact that it's because science constantly discovers new things to replace the old theories, which i told her, but is this actually a fact, that theories have an average lifespan of 30 years?

Let's just take Christianity.

There are something like 34,000 (yes, that's correct thirty-four thousand) different denominations of Christianity.

Christianity today is nothing like Christianity of 500 CE or earlier

The simple fact that your female friend is able to express an opinion at all is evidence that Christianity has changed, a lot.

If we are going to be so broad in our definitions then all you need to say is the science of combustion (making fire) has been around longer than her religion (2000 years or so), so she needs to stop listening to that old bullshine she is being fed by her religious sources and try using her own brain for a bit.

MM
"The greatest deception men suffer is from their own opinions" - Leonardo da Vinci

"I think I use the term “radical” rather loosely, just for emphasis. If you describe yourself as “atheist,” some people will say, “Don’t you mean ‘agnostic’?” I have to reply that I really do mean atheist, I really do not believe that there is a god; in fact, I am convinced that there is not a god (a subtle difference). I see not a shred of evidence to suggest that there is one ... etc., etc. It’s easier to say that I am a radical atheist, just to signal that I really mean it, have thought about it a great deal, and that it’s an opinion I hold seriously." - Douglas Adams (and I echo the sentiment)
Reply



Messages In This Thread
RE: A question about the lifespan of scientific theories. - by ManMachine - January 11, 2015 at 10:33 pm

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Fine Tuning Principle: Devastating Disproof and Scientific Refutation of Atheism. Nishant Xavier 97 7746 September 20, 2023 at 1:31 pm
Last Post: Foxaèr
  Are there any scientific books or studies that explain what makes a person religious? WisdomOfTheTrees 13 2684 February 9, 2017 at 2:33 am
Last Post: Mirek-Polska
  Is atheism a scientific perspective? AAA 358 62769 January 27, 2017 at 7:49 pm
Last Post: brewer
  Theist ➤ Why ☠ Evolution is not Scientific ✔ The Joker 348 48271 November 26, 2016 at 11:47 pm
Last Post: Amarok
  Scientific knowledge versus spiritual knowledge LadyForCamus 471 73848 February 17, 2016 at 12:36 pm
Last Post: LadyForCamus
  Help: jumped on for seeking scientific proof of spiritual healing emilynghiem 55 18094 February 21, 2015 at 2:54 am
Last Post: JesusHChrist
  Atheism, Scientific Atheism and Antitheism tantric 33 12734 January 18, 2015 at 1:05 pm
Last Post: helyott
  Atheistic Dogma- Scientific Fundamentalism sswhateverlove 315 46600 September 20, 2014 at 3:49 pm
Last Post: Whateverist
  A Scientific Response to Creationist on: Kinds Duke Guilmon 28 8429 April 27, 2014 at 8:45 am
Last Post: Duke Guilmon
  Scientific Morality! It's about time! Magnum 58 23205 August 8, 2013 at 2:01 pm
Last Post: Mister Agenda



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)