Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: April 29, 2024, 1:33 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Thank you, Sam Harris
#41
RE: Thank you, Sam Harris
I love this man. Sam Harris is Lucifer; he brings the light of truth to the darkness of faith. He also supports Israel.
Reply
#42
RE: Thank you, Sam Harris
I would feel sorry for any woman with boobs like that.
Reply
#43
RE: Thank you, Sam Harris
(December 9, 2013 at 6:59 pm)StrongWaters Wrote: Harris lost that debate completely. The foundation for moral behavior is rooted in the very invariant laws governing nature. Those laws have a governor and anchor holding the weaker force back. The strong nuclear force in physics demonstrates a parallel to the same demands of an invariant God. Laws are symmetric and invariable, just as the physical construct holding them in place. You cannot have unity held in place within a chaotic system apart from the force bringing unity and equilibrium to the system. We have learned nothing from quantum mechanics about the ability of the observer unless we also apply those laws above and below. Nothing can rise above its source.

Aside from seemingly showing ignorance of the problem of induction, you seem to be committing a very obvious fallacy of reification here.
Reply
#44
RE: Thank you, Sam Harris
(December 10, 2013 at 8:17 pm)MindForgedManacle Wrote:
(December 9, 2013 at 6:59 pm)StrongWaters Wrote: Harris lost that debate completely. The foundation for moral behavior is rooted in the very invariant laws governing nature. Those laws have a governor and anchor holding the weaker force back. The strong nuclear force in physics demonstrates a parallel to the same demands of an invariant God. Laws are symmetric and invariable, just as the physical construct holding them in place. You cannot have unity held in place within a chaotic system apart from the force bringing unity and equilibrium to the system. We have learned nothing from quantum mechanics about the ability of the observer unless we also apply those laws above and below. Nothing can rise above its source.

Aside from seemingly showing ignorance of the problem of induction, you seem to be committing a very obvious fallacy of reification here.

Are you all getting enough fiber in your diet? Wink Shades
"There's always a bigger fish."
Qui-Gon Jin (Star Wars)
Reply
#45
RE: Thank you, Sam Harris
(December 9, 2013 at 6:59 pm)StrongWaters Wrote: Harris lost that debate completely. The foundation for moral behavior is rooted in the very invariant laws governing nature. Those laws have a governor and anchor holding the weaker force back. The strong nuclear force in physics demonstrates a parallel to the same demands of an invariant God. Laws are symmetric and invariable, just as the physical construct holding them in place. You cannot have unity held in place within a chaotic system apart from the force bringing unity and equilibrium to the system. We have learned nothing from quantum mechanics about the ability of the observer unless we also apply those laws above and below. Nothing can rise above its source.

A fountain rises above it's source doesn't it? So does a rocket. So does the hot air that comes from your mouth.

The parallels you draw here are just absurd." The foundation of moral behavior is rooted in the very invariant laws governing nature" is it? Is morality rooted in gravity? Does e=mc^2 have a deep moral meaning?

And what evidence are you basing the statement "Those laws have a governor and anchor holding the weaker force back."? What is this governor? Can you dmonstrate that this entity exists? And this 'weaker force' is what? And if it is weaker, what is stronger?

This whole post is just a bit of babble, it reminds me of the crap Deepak came out with; pseudo-scientific BS(the physicist in the audience rebutted him in a rather funny way) wrapped up in a complicated sentence structure and all of this masks your massive and unfounded assumptions. you want to be taken seriously? Back this up with evidence. Else, it is just a waste of the energy needed to power your laptop.
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  "Thank God" after the fact. Brian37 44 2681 June 4, 2021 at 9:30 pm
Last Post: onlinebiker
  Thank you for more of your nonsense, Pat Robertson Foxaèr 22 3455 October 3, 2017 at 4:21 pm
Last Post: Puke Skywalker
  Thank ALLAH that the pagan holiday of CHRISTMAS is over! 21stCenturyIconoclast 62 8461 December 30, 2016 at 1:13 am
Last Post: Joods
Video Sam harris, How the Sausage of faith Is Made Atheistoz 3 2219 November 7, 2015 at 6:51 pm
Last Post: Chad32
  Sam Harris simply destroys William Lane Craig little_monkey 10 6261 July 25, 2013 at 1:03 pm
Last Post: The Reality Salesman01
  Sam Harris Question Phil 8 2829 February 13, 2012 at 9:58 am
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  Sam Harris on 9/11 little_monkey 31 10706 September 10, 2011 at 6:47 pm
Last Post: Erinome
  Ignore the hero - thank God! Welsh cake 15 4098 April 25, 2011 at 10:16 pm
Last Post: Cinjin



Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)