Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: May 17, 2024, 4:07 am

Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 1 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
What would you consider to be evidence for God?
RE: What would you consider to be evidence for God?
(September 25, 2015 at 9:14 am)Stimbo Wrote:
(September 25, 2015 at 3:37 am)Pandæmonium Wrote: ^^

All bollocks.

Give me one reference in the bible to, say, a singularity, or particle physics, or even something that references the billions of years it took to get from hot dense state to people being able to write the bible.

"And God said, “Let there be light,” and there was light."

What more do you need? Like E=MC^2, it tells you everything with unbelievable economy.
A single dimension consisting of infinite density and temperature expanding out without preplanning would be randomized; E=MC^2 wouldn't exist and a universe with less density would not form stars due to an expansion rate that wouldn't provide an opportunity to pull together the gas and dust; whereas, if more density, gas and dust would condense into black holes, or neutron stars.
Atheist Credo: An universe by chance that also just happened to admit the observer by chance.
Reply
RE: What would you consider to be evidence for God?
(October 7, 2015 at 1:20 am)snowtracks Wrote:
(September 25, 2015 at 9:14 am)Stimbo Wrote: "And God said, “Let there be light,” and there was light."

What more do you need? Like E=MC^2, it tells you everything with unbelievable economy.
A single dimension consisting of infinite density and temperature expanding out without preplanning would be randomized; E=MC^2 wouldn't exist and a universe with less density would not form stars due to an expansion rate that wouldn't provide an opportunity to pull together the gas and dust; whereas, if more density, gas and dust would condense into black holes, or neutron stars.

(September 25, 2015 at 6:09 am)houseofcantor Wrote: And you fuckers misusing the anthropic principle to justify your prsuppositional nonsense should be stapled to the wall. 

I must have known you were coming. Dodgy
Reply
RE: What would you consider to be evidence for God?
I don't believe evidence for God is possible due to his unfalsifiablity.
Reply
RE: What would you consider to be evidence for God?
(October 7, 2015 at 7:52 pm)Evie Wrote: I don't believe evidence for God is possible due to his unfalsifiablity.

‘Unfalsifiability’ was not a problem for Antony Flew in his book “There is a God: How the World's Most Notorious Atheist Changed His Mind” - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antony_Flew. God’s reveals Himself in: The Book of Nature, and The Book of written Revelation. The information is out there, you just need to let it in.
Atheist Credo: An universe by chance that also just happened to admit the observer by chance.
Reply
RE: What would you consider to be evidence for God?
And I wonder how much more money this notorious guy made after he wrote that. Me-thinks he is still an atheist and just wanted to make more money.
"Never trust a fox. Looks like a dog, behaves like a cat."
~ Erin Hunter
Reply
RE: What would you consider to be evidence for God?
I have a young fig tree that has yet to produce any fruit. Maybe god could come down and slap it around?
You make people miserable and there's nothing they can do about it, just like god.
-- Homer Simpson

God has no place within these walls, just as facts have no place within organized religion.
-- Superintendent Chalmers

Science is like a blabbermouth who ruins a movie by telling you how it ends. There are some things we don't want to know. Important things.
-- Ned Flanders

Once something's been approved by the government, it's no longer immoral.
-- The Rev Lovejoy
Reply
RE: What would you consider to be evidence for God?
(June 25, 2015 at 11:22 am)Psychonaut Wrote: ...  and that everyone knows that you're really saying

"no, and there really is no way to get evidence for such nonsense".


If we can't get evidence, because evidence (at least by scientific standards) is by it's very nature falsifiable,
(something which the god claim can't provide [currently]) then what would anyone constitute as evidence? Are those who use the "we don't have evidence yet" claim literally, deceived?

Seeing it with our own eyes? How would we know it's not a hallucination?
If by some chance we are provided falsifiability, how would we know we aren't deceived by an alien hallucination inducing device?

unless your open to the possibility to begin with no proof God provides will convince you your limited by your own mind . some people God gives proof to will just assume they are crazy or hallucinating or delusional if the possibility of God is not permitted in their minds .
Imagine there's no heaven It's easy if you try No hell below us Above us only sky Imagine all the people Living for today   FSM Grin   Imagine there's no countries It isn't hard to do Nothing to kill or die for And no religion too Imagine all the people Living life in peace You may say I'm a dreamer But I'm not the only one I hope someday you will join us And the world will be as one  - John Lennon

The easy confidence with which I know another man's religion is folly teaches me to suspect that my own is also  - Mark Twain
Reply
RE: What would you consider to be evidence for God?
(October 14, 2015 at 7:07 pm)jenny1972 Wrote:
(June 25, 2015 at 11:22 am)Psychonaut Wrote: ...  and that everyone knows that you're really saying

"no, and there really is no way to get evidence for such nonsense".


If we can't get evidence, because evidence (at least by scientific standards) is by it's very nature falsifiable,
(something which the god claim can't provide [currently]) then what would anyone constitute as evidence? Are those who use the "we don't have evidence yet" claim literally, deceived?

Seeing it with our own eyes? How would we know it's not a hallucination?
If by some chance we are provided falsifiability, how would we know we aren't deceived by an alien hallucination inducing device?

unless your open to the possibility to begin with no proof God provides will convince you your limited only by your own mind . some people God gives proof to will just assume they are crazy or hallucinating or delusional if the possibility of God is not permitted in their minds .


As many of s responded to you on the other thread, the vast majority of atheists are open to the 'possibility' of the existence of a god.

The only thing that prevents us from believing in the existence of a god, is the continued absence of demonstrable evidence and reasoned argument to support the claim that a god exists.

Atheism is not a dogmatic position, it is a provisional one.

Belief comes from being convinced that a premise or proposition is true. Why should I be convinced that the claim that a god exists is true, before the claim is supported by demonstrable evidence?

You'd believe if you just opened your heart" is a terrible argument for religion. It's basically saying, "If you bias yourself enough, you can convince yourself that this is true." If religion were true, people wouldn't need faith to believe it -- it would be supported by good evidence.
Reply
RE: What would you consider to be evidence for God?
(October 14, 2015 at 12:06 am)snowtracks Wrote:
(October 7, 2015 at 7:52 pm)Evie Wrote: I don't believe evidence for God is possible due to his unfalsifiablity.

‘Unfalsifiability’ was not a problem for Antony Flew in his book “There is a God: How the World's Most Notorious Atheist Changed His Mind” - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antony_Flew. God’s reveals Himself in: The Book of Nature, and The Book of written Revelation. The information is out there, you just need to let it in.

Anthony Flew's credulity is hardly our problem. Don't think we didn't notice the thinly-veiled appeal to authority, either.

Got anything that isn't fallacious?
Reply
RE: What would you consider to be evidence for God?
(October 14, 2015 at 7:25 pm)Simon Moon Wrote:
(October 14, 2015 at 7:07 pm)jenny1972 Wrote: unless your open to the possibility to begin with no proof God provides will convince you your limited only by your own mind . some people God gives proof to will just assume they are crazy or hallucinating or delusional if the possibility of God is not permitted in their minds .


As many of s responded to you on the other thread, the vast majority of atheists are open to the 'possibility' of the existence of a god.

The only thing that prevents us from believing in the existence of a god, is the continued absence of demonstrable evidence and reasoned argument to support the claim that a god exists.

Atheism is not a dogmatic position, it is a provisional one.

Belief comes from being convinced that a premise or proposition is true. Why should I be convinced that the claim that a god exists is true, before the claim is supported by demonstrable evidence?

im sure there are some people who are convinced God does not exist  ... but its good to know many people are open to the possibility these are the people who will one day have a relationship with God when that proof is provided to them .
Imagine there's no heaven It's easy if you try No hell below us Above us only sky Imagine all the people Living for today   FSM Grin   Imagine there's no countries It isn't hard to do Nothing to kill or die for And no religion too Imagine all the people Living life in peace You may say I'm a dreamer But I'm not the only one I hope someday you will join us And the world will be as one  - John Lennon

The easy confidence with which I know another man's religion is folly teaches me to suspect that my own is also  - Mark Twain
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  If you learned that the god of [insert religion] is real, would all bets be off? Sicnoo0 58 4435 February 25, 2024 at 1:04 am
Last Post: Nay_Sayer
  Dear Atheists: what would convince you God/Christ is Real? JJoseph 207 11852 February 12, 2024 at 1:51 am
Last Post: Goosebump
  The Historical Evidence for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ. Nishant Xavier 38 2569 August 7, 2023 at 10:24 pm
Last Post: LinuxGal
  When were the Gospels Written? The External and Internal Evidence. Nishant Xavier 62 3432 August 6, 2023 at 10:25 pm
Last Post: LinuxGal
  Veridical NDEs: Evidence/Proof of the Soul and the After-Life? Nishant Xavier 32 1740 August 6, 2023 at 5:36 pm
Last Post: LinuxGal
  Isaiah 53, 700 B.C: Historical Evidence of the Divine Omniscience. Nishant Xavier 91 4931 August 6, 2023 at 2:19 pm
Last Post: LinuxGal
  Conscience and the Moral Argument as Evidence for the Goodness of God. Nishant Xavier 162 8313 July 9, 2023 at 7:53 am
Last Post: Deesse23
  Signature in the Cell: DNA as Evidence for Design, beside Nature's Laws/Fine-Tuning. Nishant Xavier 54 2940 July 8, 2023 at 8:23 am
Last Post: Fake Messiah
  Why the resurrection accounts are not evidence LinuxGal 5 1067 October 29, 2022 at 2:01 pm
Last Post: LinuxGal
  Can you consider Atheism an ethnicity UniverseCaptain 31 2913 September 27, 2021 at 7:23 pm
Last Post: UniverseCaptain



Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)