Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: June 1, 2024, 6:57 am

Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 1 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
What would you consider to be evidence for God?
RE: What would you consider to be evidence for God?
God poo on the front lawn would convince me.
I'd be like,' oh no, not another one!'
Reply
RE: What would you consider to be evidence for God?
(September 10, 2015 at 9:46 am)Little lunch Wrote: God poo on the front lawn would convince me.
I'd be like,' oh no, not another one!'

Maybe it is there and you are misidentifying it.  I did not realize I have been seeing Wiccan dung for many years until I saw this informative video:



"A wise man ... proportions his belief to the evidence."
— David Hume, An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding, Section X, Part I.
Reply
RE: What would you consider to be evidence for God?
(September 10, 2015 at 11:31 am)Pyrrho Wrote:
(September 10, 2015 at 9:46 am)Little lunch Wrote: God poo on the front lawn would convince me.
I'd be like,' oh no, not another one!'

Maybe it is there and you are misidentifying it.  I did not realize I have been seeing Wiccan dung for many years until I saw this informative video:


That's too funny!  That guy should play Moses.
Reply
RE: What would you consider to be evidence for God?
(September 9, 2015 at 3:00 am)Wyrd of Gawd Wrote: How about having all of the galaxies arrange themselves to write out the entire Catholic Bible across the sky so that everyone can real it at the same time in their own written language?   And if it's Allah who is the big wig then he can have them do the same with the Koran.  Likewise whichever deity is the real deal he can do the same thing with his holy book.  

Or how about giving everyone a minimum IQ of 500,000?

Or how about producing the 969 year-old Methuselah?
Evidence is in the record.
---------------------------------------
Scripture stated creation accurately millenniums before scientific verification.
God -
1. Created the physical universe. *
2. Cleared away the interplanetary debris and partially transformed Earth’s atmosphere so light (non-visible spectrum) from the heavenly bodies could penetrate to the surface of Earth’s oceans primary for photosynthesis.
3. Established the water cycle.
4. Formed ocean basins and continental land masses and then subsequent land plant growth,
5. Transformed the atmosphere from translucent to transparent (visible light).
6. Produced swarms of small sea animals.
7. Created birds and sea mammals.
8. Created land mammals capable of interacting with the future human race which included bi-pedal mammals** as Neanderthals (non-spirit hominid - as is all mammals; and consequently have no existence after bodily death).
9. Created human species (Adam and Eve). Endowed with a spirit (described as ‘made in God’s image’) which gives them many orders-of-magnitude capabilities above mammals; and will have existence after bodily death.

Once the accuracy for the past has been established, the future record can be trusted. God uses this universe to bring an end to evil and suffering; thus sin was allowed to enter this ‘world’ and infect all of us to accomplish this purpose. God only needed one specie - Homo sapiens sapiens. That’s why the SETI Institute is wasting resources.
 
*The first 9 billion years (by) were required to create heavy elements which were a product of stellar heat. These heavy elements are needed for the formation of planets and a requirement for advance life. Then it took around 3.5 (by) for outer-space radiation sources to subside enough for advance life.
**Took around 1 (by) for enough animal and plant deaths to build-up bio-deposits for energy and building elements to launch a high-tech global society.***
***The reason for this society is to provide the resources to fulfill the ’church’s’ mission ’the great commission’ which is that salvation is a free gift to everyone. Once that task has been completed, Christ the Creator will return to earth to wrap-up the conquest and removal of evil (appears evil will be confined dimensionally to Hell - forever sealed of from the New Creation). Scripture gave the scientific timeline for the past universe’s records and also gives the future which is: The ‘now’ current period (most biblical scholars agree this period began when the state of Israel was established, 1948 May, and most agree this period’s outer boundary is 100 years [a biblical generation]; this 100 years would include a 7-year tribulation period culminating in the Return of Christ to earth. Then, 75 days transition period to the Millennium kingdom (an OT promise) followed by the 1000 year reign of Christ on Earth, then the great white-throng judgment where the books are opened. Next followed by destruction of this universe (old creation), and then creation of the ‘new creation’ where evil won’t exist nor even it’s potentiality.
Atheist Credo: A universe by chance that also just happened to admit the observer by chance.
Reply
RE: What would you consider to be evidence for God?
^^

All bollocks.

Give me one reference in the bible to, say, a singularity, or particle physics, or even something that references the billions of years it took to get from hot dense state to people being able to write the bible. What about a reference to other hominids?

Just one reference. You guys and your fairy tales, man. The insanity of what you people actually believe never fails to surprise me.
Love atheistforums.org? Consider becoming a patreon and helping towards our server costs.

[Image: 146748944129044_zpsomrzyn3d.gif]
Reply
RE: What would you consider to be evidence for God?
I had this incredible revelation from God, check it out! All you have to do is take parts of it, repeat them as necessary, and put them in the right order. Those who have the gift will find many secrets. It contains all the knowledge we will ever learn. Are you ready for this? It came to me in a dream, so I'll try and reproduce it as well as I can:


Feel free to send me a private message.
Please visit my website here! It's got lots of information about atheism/theism and support for new atheists.

Index of useful threads and discussions
Index of my best videos
Quickstart guide to the forum
Reply
RE: What would you consider to be evidence for God?
The only evidence for god is god. The only evidence left behind is the prophet. Grab one of them fuckers and run 'em through the lab, you'll find essentially that god is a form of psychosis.

And you fuckers misusing the anthropic principle to justify your prsuppositional nonsense should be stapled to the wall. 

To answer the question simply there is none.
Reply
RE: What would you consider to be evidence for God?
The same sort of evidence that would convince me 1+1=3 all along and for all cases would also convince me God exists. Nothing short of it.
Reply
RE: What would you consider to be evidence for God?
Evidence that I was cracking up and had no idea how reality worked. That would be step one, anyway.
Feel free to send me a private message.
Please visit my website here! It's got lots of information about atheism/theism and support for new atheists.

Index of useful threads and discussions
Index of my best videos
Quickstart guide to the forum
Reply
RE: What would you consider to be evidence for God?
(September 25, 2015 at 3:37 am)Pandæmonium Wrote: ^^

All bollocks.

Give me one reference in the bible to, say, a singularity, or particle physics, or even something that references the billions of years it took to get from hot dense state to people being able to write the bible.

"And God said, “Let there be light,” and there was light."

What more do you need? Like E=MC^2, it tells you everything with unbelievable economy.
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist.  This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair.  Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second.  That means there's a situation vacant.'
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  If you learned that the god of [insert religion] is real, would all bets be off? Sicnoo0 58 4632 February 25, 2024 at 1:04 am
Last Post: Nay_Sayer
  Dear Atheists: what would convince you God/Christ is Real? JJoseph 207 12825 February 12, 2024 at 1:51 am
Last Post: Goosebump
  The Historical Evidence for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ. Nishant Xavier 38 2649 August 7, 2023 at 10:24 pm
Last Post: LinuxGal
  When were the Gospels Written? The External and Internal Evidence. Nishant Xavier 62 3547 August 6, 2023 at 10:25 pm
Last Post: LinuxGal
  Veridical NDEs: Evidence/Proof of the Soul and the After-Life? Nishant Xavier 32 1792 August 6, 2023 at 5:36 pm
Last Post: LinuxGal
  Isaiah 53, 700 B.C: Historical Evidence of the Divine Omniscience. Nishant Xavier 91 5061 August 6, 2023 at 2:19 pm
Last Post: LinuxGal
  Conscience and the Moral Argument as Evidence for the Goodness of God. Nishant Xavier 162 8887 July 9, 2023 at 7:53 am
Last Post: Deesse23
  Signature in the Cell: DNA as Evidence for Design, beside Nature's Laws/Fine-Tuning. Nishant Xavier 54 3031 July 8, 2023 at 8:23 am
Last Post: Fake Messiah
  Why the resurrection accounts are not evidence LinuxGal 5 1077 October 29, 2022 at 2:01 pm
Last Post: LinuxGal
  Can you consider Atheism an ethnicity UniverseCaptain 31 2965 September 27, 2021 at 7:23 pm
Last Post: UniverseCaptain



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)