Current time: 31st October 2014, 15:50

Our server costs $125 a month to run. Since November 2013 we have raised $280!
Please help keep our community online by donating what you can.
Post Reply 
 
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Votes - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Scientific proof for a theist.
24th August 2011, 00:41
Post: #21
    3 years membership!
RE: Scientific proof for a theist.
Thanks you guys! What you've provided so far should be enough.
Rate user Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
24th August 2011, 01:40 (This post was last modified: 24th August 2011 01:40 by Minimalist.)
Post: #22
Best Member 2012! 20k+ posts! 5 years membership!
RE: Scientific proof for a theist.
(23rd August 2011 22:42)DraxQuin Wrote:  So in short I have a bunch of religious friends, today I explained to them I was an atheist, they then went on a huge rant against me. Now they're against evolution and one of them sent me this link:

Step #1: Send them your own link and tell them to read through it.

http://www.talkorigins.org/origins/faqs-evolution.html


Step #2: Tell them you aren't their fucking secretary.

Step #3: Tell them that anyone who believes in an invisibie sky daddy is too fucking stupid to understand evolution in the first place.

Step #4: Get smarter friends.
[Image: Atheismreality_zps62a2c96a.jpg]
Rate user Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
24th August 2011, 02:20
Post: #23
    3 years membership!
RE: Scientific proof for a theist.
Regarding this website claim that Evolution disagrees with the law of Thermodynamics, what is the explanation for this?
Rate user Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
24th August 2011, 02:36
Post: #24
  17k posts! 3 years membership!
RE: Scientific proof for a theist.
You think there's an explanation for anything that comes out of a theists mouth? That's why it's called faith in the first place.
“I find something repulsive about the idea of vicarious redemption. I would not throw my numberless sins onto a scapegoat and expect them to pass from me" - Christopher Hitchens.
Rate user Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
24th August 2011, 04:08
Post: #25
  6k posts! 5 years membership!
RE: Scientific proof for a theist.
(24th August 2011 02:20)DraxQuin Wrote:  Regarding this website claim that Evolution disagrees with the law of Thermodynamics, what is the explanation for this?


Due to a profound,willful ignorance, apologists often misquote the Second Law of Thermodymamics.That law refers to an ISOLATED SYSTEM,which the earth is NOT. IE we get our energy from an external source: THE SUN.

As I said,it's like trying to communicate with an orangutang,and a pretty thick one at that..


Quote:The second law of thermodynamics is an expression of the tendency that over time, differences in temperature, pressure, and chemical potential equilibrate in an isolated physical system. From the state of thermodynamic equilibrium, the law deduced the principle of the increase of entropy and explains the phenomenon of irreversibility in nature. The second law declares the impossibility of machines that generate usable energy from the abundant internal energy of nature by processes called perpetual motion of the second kind.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_law_...modynamics
Man is not so much a rational animal as a rationalising one.
Rate user Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
24th August 2011, 04:16
Post: #26
    3 years membership!
RE: Scientific proof for a theist.
(24th August 2011 02:20)DraxQuin Wrote:  Regarding this website claim that Evolution disagrees with the law of Thermodynamics, what is the explanation for this?

1. Thermodynamics concerns energy, not complexity.
2. The second law of thermodynamics does state that is impossible for entropy to reduce in a closed system (it is talking about energy entropy, not information entropy, but no matter). The Earth is not a closed system because it takes in energy from the Sun.
3. If evolution violated the laws of physics in the past, why does it not violate them when we observe it in action in the present? Any laws it violates are clearly wrong.
Rate user Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
24th August 2011, 04:22 (This post was last modified: 24th August 2011 04:25 by Rev. Rye.)
Post: #27
  2k posts! 4 years membership!
RE: Scientific proof for a theist.
(24th August 2011 02:20)DraxQuin Wrote:  Regarding this website claim that Evolution disagrees with the law of Thermodynamics, what is the explanation for this?

Here it is from Talk.origins

Claim The second law of thermodynamics says that everything tends toward disorder, making evolutionary development [which is order from disorder] impossible.

FACT: The second law of thermodynamics says no such thing. It says that heat will not spontaneously flow from a colder body to a warmer one or, equivalently, that total entropy (a measure of useful energy) in a closed system will not decrease. This does not prevent increasing order because the earth is not a closed system; sunlight (with low entropy) shines on it and heat (with higher entropy) radiates off. This flow of energy, and the change in entropy that accompanies it, can and will power local decreases in entropy on earth. Entropy is not the same as disorder. Sometimes the two correspond, but sometimes order increases as entropy increases. (Aranda-Espinoza et al. 1999; Kestenbaum 1998) Entropy can even be used to produce order, such as in the sorting of molecules by size (Han and Craighead 2000). Even in a closed system, pockets of lower entropy can form if they are offset by increased entropy elsewhere in the system.
In short, order from disorder happens on earth all the time.

FACT: The only processes necessary for evolution to occur are reproduction, heritable variation, and selection. All of these are seen to happen all the time, so, obviously, no physical laws are preventing them. In fact, connections between evolution and entropy have been studied in depth, and never to the detriment of evolution (Demetrius 2000). Several scientists have proposed that evolution and the origin of life is driven by entropy (McShea 1998). Some see the information content of organisms subject to diversification according to the second law (Brooks and Wiley 1988), so organisms diversify to fill empty niches much as a gas expands to fill an empty container. Others propose that highly ordered complex systems emerge and evolve to dissipate energy (and increase overall entropy) more efficiently (Schneider and Kay 1994).

And, for the record, there's no evidence that John Michael Fischer has any sort of degree. The most information I've been able to find about him on the internet says he is apparently from Alabama. I've done everything short of asking him (His email address is on his home page, but considering all the things I'm going through right now, between getting my basement back in order and all the stuff surrounding my college transfer, I don't feel like getting into a debate with a crank who sees fit to make every discipline of science his bitch), but I seriously doubt he has an actual degree, certainly nothing related to science.
[Image: mybanner4a5bf6f1f1d17.png]
Rate user Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
24th August 2011, 11:55
Post: #28
  7k posts! 4 years membership!
RE: Scientific proof for a theist.
Tell them they need to get a proper education, trying to argue thermodynamics against evolutions just proves that they understand neither. A person capable of correctly understand thermodynamics, certainly is capable of understanding evolution, unless there is a very strong bias toawrds their particular fairy tale.
Rate user Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
24th August 2011, 17:21
Post: #29
  12k posts! 3 years membership!
RE: Scientific proof for a theist.
(23rd August 2011 23:31)Rhythm Wrote:  Invite them to this forum.

x2
WANTED - Evil genius seeks minions to sacrifice their lives in world domination attempt. Must be prepared to work for narcissistic psychopath with long hours and low pay. Applicants face certainty of an unpleasant and messy death. Costumes and death rays provided. NO WEIRDOS. Call 1-800-MWA-HAHA
*** Seven puppies were harmed in the creation of this post ***
Rate user Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Possibly Related Threads...
Thread: Author Replies: Views: Last Post
  Lets question the sanity of theist.. dyresand 2 122 23rd October 2014 20:26
Last Post: dyresand
  The Proof! rtfguy 50 1277 2nd October 2014 21:01
Last Post: TaraJo
  Atheistic Dogma- Scientific Fundamentalism sswhateverlove 315 5452 20th September 2014 20:49
Last Post: whateverist
  A Scientific Response to Creationist on: Kinds Metazoa Zeke 28 660 27th April 2014 13:45
Last Post: Metazoa Zeke
  Proof of the soul? JesusLover1 50 1673 6th March 2014 16:23
Last Post: pocaracas
  UK Now officially mostly non-theist là bạn điên 20 1444 28th December 2013 20:36
Last Post: Stimbo
  Walking the a/theist line with family & friends atheistmama 9 775 5th December 2013 15:09
Last Post: zenblaster
Tongue Looking for a word to describe someone who is not a theist. Ideas? whateverist 18 1336 28th November 2013 01:06
Last Post: whateverist
  I am an Agnostic Theist Flair128512 26 2329 19th October 2013 09:05
Last Post: pineapplebunnybounce
  Highest up former theist? Brian37 9 981 26th September 2013 13:49
Last Post: Doubting Thomas



User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)