Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 8, 2024, 9:56 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 7 Vote(s) - 1.57 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Proving The Resurrection By the Minimal Facts Approach
RE: Proving The Resurrection By the Minimal Facts Approach
He's O/D'd on the jesus freak Kool Aid.


Quote:The Evidence Demands a Response

Now, all you need is evidence instead of the same old bullshit you've been spewing since the start.
Reply
RE: Proving The Resurrection By the Minimal Facts Approach
(July 24, 2015 at 8:37 pm)Tartarus Sauce Wrote: I'm assuming that somebody already told this guy that some of the earliest copies we've uncovered of the New Testament never made any mention of a ressurection, right?

The following passage of Paul's first Letter to the Corinthians contains a "proto-creed" of the early Church which Paul probably learned from the apostles within five years of the resurrection of Jesus.

Quote:1 Corinthians 15
15 Now, brothers and sisters, I want to remind you of the gospel I preached to you, which you received and on which you have taken your stand. 2 By this gospel you are saved, if you hold firmly to the word I preached to you. Otherwise, you have believed in vain.

3 For what I received I passed on to you as of first importance: that Christ died for our sins according to the Scriptures, 4 that he was buried, that he was raised on the third day according to the Scriptures, 5 and that he appeared to Cephas, and then to the Twelve. 6 After that, he appeared to more than five hundred of the brothers and sisters at the same time, most of whom are still living, though some have fallen asleep. 7 Then he appeared to James, then to all the apostles, 8 and last of all he appeared to me also, as to one abnormally born.

The letter was written before the gospels.

Hope this helps. [Image: ani_tiphat.gif]
Reply
RE: Proving The Resurrection By the Minimal Facts Approach
(July 24, 2015 at 8:47 pm)Minimalist Wrote: He's O/D'd on the jesus freak Kool Aid.


Quote:The Evidence Demands a Response

Now, all you need is evidence instead of the same old bullshit you've been spewing since the start.

Now all you need to do is open some books, learn a few ancient languages, spend 20 years studying the texts...and then, maybe, you will be in a position to even attempt to refute Ehrman & Co.

But you don't have 20 years, do you?
Reply
RE: Proving The Resurrection By the Minimal Facts Approach
I'm not going to waste time dismissing you - actually you have already been dismissed - and your fucking fairy tales.

Just sit back and let jesusism fade away.  It can flush you down the shitter with it.
Reply
RE: Proving The Resurrection By the Minimal Facts Approach
(June 24, 2015 at 9:54 pm)Beccs Wrote: 1. Jesus died by crucifixion

This is a claim only.  Many people were crucified, no doubt some of them with the same name.  There is no evidence that the person referred to in the bible was actually a living, breathing person.

2. Jesus' disciples believed that He rose and appeared to them

Yes they did.  And their accounts of this "event" are contradictory at best.  But then some people claim that Jesus appears to them on toast.  Are we to believe them, just because they make the claim?

3. Saul, the persecutor of the Church, was suddenly changed

People change.  I've known truly devout people in one religion to become truly devout in another. 

4. James, the skeptical brother of Jesus, was suddenly changed

As above.


5. Jesus' tomb was found to be empty

Again, a claim.  See my answer to 1., above

Let's say we find an empty grave now on 2015. Would we suspect a resurrection or grave robbers? Just wondering.
(August 21, 2017 at 11:31 pm)KevinM1 Wrote: "I'm not a troll"
Religious Views: He gay

0/10

Hammy Wrote:and we also have a sheep on our bed underneath as well
Reply
RE: Proving The Resurrection By the Minimal Facts Approach
(July 24, 2015 at 9:50 pm)Minimalist Wrote: I'm not going to waste time dismissing you - actually you have already been dismissed - and your fucking fairy tales.

Just sit back and let jesusism fade away.  It can flush you down the shitter with it.

Jesus loves you, Min.
Reply
RE: Proving The Resurrection By the Minimal Facts Approach
(July 24, 2015 at 10:09 pm)Losty Wrote:
(June 24, 2015 at 9:54 pm)Beccs Wrote: 1. Jesus died by crucifixion

This is a claim only.  Many people were crucified, no doubt some of them with the same name.  There is no evidence that the person referred to in the bible was actually a living, breathing person.

2. Jesus' disciples believed that He rose and appeared to them

Yes they did.  And their accounts of this "event" are contradictory at best.  But then some people claim that Jesus appears to them on toast.  Are we to believe them, just because they make the claim?

3. Saul, the persecutor of the Church, was suddenly changed

People change.  I've known truly devout people in one religion to become truly devout in another. 

4. James, the skeptical brother of Jesus, was suddenly changed

As above.


5. Jesus' tomb was found to be empty

Again, a claim.  See my answer to 1., above

Let's say we find an empty grave now on 2015. Would we suspect a resurrection or grave robbers? Just wondering.

The latter. Unless we had:

1. A promise to rise from the dead beforehand.
2. Verification of death.
3. Witnesses who saw the person alive afterward.
4. Conversion of both skeptics and enemies resulting from appearances.

You know, the kind of stuff Christians have...
Reply
RE: Proving The Resurrection By the Minimal Facts Approach
(July 24, 2015 at 10:28 pm)Randy Carson Wrote:
(July 24, 2015 at 10:09 pm)Losty Wrote: Let's say we find an empty grave now on 2015. Would we suspect a resurrection or grave robbers? Just wondering.

The latter. Unless we had:

1. A promise to rise from the dead beforehand.
2. Verification of death.
3. Witnesses who saw the person alive afterward.
4. Conversion of both skeptics and enemies resulting from appearances.

You know, the kind of stuff Christians have...

No, the kind of stuff Christians claim to have.  There is no corroborating evidence.  

The Bible is the claim; it is not the evidence.
Skepticism is not a position; it is an approach to claims.
Science is not a subject, but a method.
Reply
RE: Proving The Resurrection By the Minimal Facts Approach
I'll be checking the thread periodically from now on, but unless something substantive is posted, there won't be any further need for me to respond.

Thank you all for your non-participation. It has been most instructive.

Oh, and when you go to bed tonight (and you don't forget to NOT say your prayers to a non-existent God), while you're lying there in the dark, just remember that you have no rebuttals for these five facts which point to the resurrection of Jesus.

Sweet dreams. [Image: wink.gif]
Reply
RE: Proving The Resurrection By the Minimal Facts Approach
(July 24, 2015 at 10:09 pm)Losty Wrote:
(June 24, 2015 at 9:54 pm)Beccs Wrote: 1. Jesus died by crucifixion

This is a claim only.  Many people were crucified, no doubt some of them with the same name.  There is no evidence that the person referred to in the bible was actually a living, breathing person.

2. Jesus' disciples believed that He rose and appeared to them

Yes they did.  And their accounts of this "event" are contradictory at best.  But then some people claim that Jesus appears to them on toast.  Are we to believe them, just because they make the claim?

3. Saul, the persecutor of the Church, was suddenly changed

People change.  I've known truly devout people in one religion to become truly devout in another. 

4. James, the skeptical brother of Jesus, was suddenly changed

As above.


5. Jesus' tomb was found to be empty

Again, a claim.  See my answer to 1., above

Let's say we find an empty grave now on 2015. Would we suspect a resurrection or grave robbers? Just wondering.

Hi Losty, I've missed you!

/Backtotopic
Whoever fights monsters should see to it that in the process he does not become a monster. And if you gaze long enough into an abyss, the abyss will gaze back into you

Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Proving evolution? LinuxGal 24 3496 March 19, 2023 at 10:36 pm
Last Post: Ferrocyanide
  What will win the god wars? Faith, Fantasy, Facts, or God? Greatest I am 98 9319 December 28, 2020 at 12:01 pm
Last Post: Greatest I am
  In what way is the Resurrection the best explanation? GrandizerII 159 20696 November 25, 2019 at 6:46 am
Last Post: Abaddon_ire
  Travis Walton versus The Resurrection. Jehanne 61 17830 November 29, 2017 at 8:21 pm
Last Post: Angrboda
  Why do Christians believe in the Resurrection of Jesus but not alien abductions? Jehanne 72 13379 June 27, 2016 at 1:54 am
Last Post: Redbeard The Pink
  We can be certain of NO resurrection - A Response Randy Carson 136 41927 October 2, 2015 at 4:10 am
Last Post: Aractus
  Disproving The Resurrection By The Maximal Facts Approach BrianSoddingBoru4 160 29765 July 5, 2015 at 6:35 pm
Last Post: Jenny A
  Obama and the simulated resurrection professor 116 20752 April 25, 2015 at 10:39 pm
Last Post: Wyrd of Gawd
  MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) His_Majesty 1617 383915 January 12, 2015 at 5:58 pm
Last Post: dyresand
  The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part Ad Neuseum) YahwehIsTheWay 32 7860 December 11, 2014 at 4:58 pm
Last Post: robvalue



Users browsing this thread: 4 Guest(s)