(August 31, 2015 at 2:45 am)Whateverist the White Wrote: Randy, I know you're out there.  I know you just wanted some appreciation.  But appreciation requires consent.  We didn't ask for your efforts on behalf of our 'eternal souls'.  Your advances were not invited.  So if you sometimes feel like no one understands you or appreciates your good intentions, remember unsolicited good intentions are just annoying.

If you can't accept people on their own terms, maybe you're just not qualified for love and appreciation .. you know?  Anyhow, have a nice break.

>:C yeah i didn't like it at all being pushy won't get you anywhere

(August 31, 2015 at 9:38 am)Redbeard The Pink Wrote: Wow...wander off for a few days, come back and Randy's under the Ban Hammer? I miss all the good shit.

Don't play innocent, Wizard. We know it was you and your arcane ways!

Thank you. Thank you so much.

Randy, protip: you know the old saying "If you go through life thinking everyone else is an asshole, chances are YOU'RE the one that's actually the asshole?" There's a corollary: "If you think that everyone who refutes your assertions, arguments, and evidence simply doesn't understand, chances are it's YOU who doesn't understand."

So, when you come back, drop the attitude and stop acting as though your five 'facts' is some pinnacle of argumentation that is unassailable. It's not.

Randy Carson Wrote:...I have to admit that Randy made a good point when he said...

(Fill in the space below with your answer. Use both sides of the paper if necessary.)

I dunno. What do YOU think was your best point, so good that even a skeptic would have to acknowledge it was well-made, if they were being reasonable?

(August 31, 2015 at 10:25 am)Mister Agenda Wrote:

Randy Carson Wrote:...I have to admit that Randy made a good point when he said...

(Fill in the space below with your answer. Use both sides of the paper if necessary.)

I dunno. What do YOU think was your best point, so good that even a skeptic would have to acknowledge it was well-made, if they were being reasonable?

We all know he'd simply point to his five 'facts'.

My message to our staff: be prepared to alot of whining. The avatar of vengeance will come and reports will be many, towards anything that seems to be the rules to him.

As it was foretold.

What's the over/under on him starting a sock account?

Because he's not staying away two weeks, no way.

(August 31, 2015 at 9:25 am)Homeless Nutter Wrote: That's like a chef taking a huge sh*t on your plate, then asking you to pick out and compliment the sweetcorn...

Was there any in Randy's posts? I mean, to compliment the sweetcorn it has to be there in the first place.

(August 31, 2015 at 12:10 pm)Parkers Tan Wrote: What's the over/under on him starting a sock account?

Because he's not staying away two weeks, no way.

My bet is on him pounding his breast over at CF. He doesn't seem the type for a sock. Too arrogant for that.

(August 31, 2015 at 12:11 pm)abaris Wrote:

(August 31, 2015 at 9:25 am)Homeless Nutter Wrote: That's like a chef taking a huge sh*t on your plate, then asking you to pick out and compliment the sweetcorn...

Was there any in Randy's posts? I mean, to compliment the sweetcorn it has to be there in the first place.

There might have been, for all I know. The point is - I'm not all that bothered to check.

To my best recollection, none of his points struck me as good when he made them. If any of them had, I would have acknowledged, as I have acknowledged the good points of other theist visitors. None of the those points have been contained in their apologetics, but there are other things they can make good points on.