Posts: 29861
Threads: 116
Joined: February 22, 2011
Reputation:
159
RE: Atheism. The UNscientific belief (part two)
October 10, 2015 at 10:29 am
(October 5, 2015 at 9:38 am)Little Rik Wrote: I would have thought that a yogini like you would have a better memory.
About a year ago or so you post similar garbage.
In that instance i explained why AM has such a bad name and considering that your memory fail you i try to help you once again.
In the late 60 and 70 the Indira Gandhi corrupted gov. ask Sarkar to forget about his PROUT political agenda that would put an end to corruption in India.
They said to him.......teach as much yoga and spirituality as much as you like but forget about PROUT.
Sarkar said no and it is here that all trouble started.
Sarkar was accused of several crimes never committed and soon after Indira Gandhi declare a state of emergency better known as the dictatorship of Indira Gandhi.
Not happy with that she order the imprisonment of Sarkar and ask all countries where AM was active to consider AM as a terrorist organisation.
Here in Australia Asio and the security services even organised the Hilton bombing which serve two purposes. One was to please the corrupted dictatorship of Indira Gandhi and the other was to convince the people that there was a problem with terrorism so in this way the security services got more power.
People died and innocent people end up in jail but of course the interests of these criminals came first.
The media got information from these criminals and gullible people like you and the nutter believe what is written in the paper.
Go ahead and keep on posting this garbage if you like.
All you do is getting more and more bad karma.
Oh, by the way, do you know what happen to Indira Gandhi and her son?
Indira was gunned down by her Sikh body guard and her son was blown in pieces by a Tamil suicide bomber.
It appear that when the bad karma get out of control like in the case of the Gandhi family the reactions come very fast indeed.  (emphasis mine)
So your solution to people claiming you belong to a terrorist organization is to make a terroristic threat? Smoooth.
Posts: 4238
Threads: 29
Joined: March 15, 2013
Reputation:
9
RE: Atheism. The UNscientific belief (part two)
October 10, 2015 at 10:39 am
(October 10, 2015 at 10:29 am)Jörmungandr Wrote: (October 5, 2015 at 9:38 am)Little Rik Wrote: I would have thought that a yogini like you would have a better memory.
About a year ago or so you post similar garbage.
In that instance i explained why AM has such a bad name and considering that your memory fail you i try to help you once again.
In the late 60 and 70 the Indira Gandhi corrupted gov. ask Sarkar to forget about his PROUT political agenda that would put an end to corruption in India.
They said to him.......teach as much yoga and spirituality as much as you like but forget about PROUT.
Sarkar said no and it is here that all trouble started.
Sarkar was accused of several crimes never committed and soon after Indira Gandhi declare a state of emergency better known as the dictatorship of Indira Gandhi.
Not happy with that she order the imprisonment of Sarkar and ask all countries where AM was active to consider AM as a terrorist organisation.
Here in Australia Asio and the security services even organised the Hilton bombing which serve two purposes. One was to please the corrupted dictatorship of Indira Gandhi and the other was to convince the people that there was a problem with terrorism so in this way the security services got more power.
People died and innocent people end up in jail but of course the interests of these criminals came first.
The media got information from these criminals and gullible people like you and the nutter believe what is written in the paper.
Go ahead and keep on posting this garbage if you like.
All you do is getting more and more bad karma.
Oh, by the way, do you know what happen to Indira Gandhi and her son?
Indira was gunned down by her Sikh body guard and her son was blown in pieces by a Tamil suicide bomber.
It appear that when the bad karma get out of control like in the case of the Gandhi family the reactions come very fast indeed. (emphasis mine)
So your solution to people claiming you belong to a terrorist organization is to make a terroristic threat? Smoooth.
Are you pessimistic by nature yog?
If you don't believe in karma why then you worry? 
Posts: 29861
Threads: 116
Joined: February 22, 2011
Reputation:
159
RE: Atheism. The UNscientific belief (part two)
October 10, 2015 at 10:52 am
(October 10, 2015 at 10:39 am)Little Rik Wrote: (October 10, 2015 at 10:29 am)Jörmungandr Wrote: So your solution to people claiming you belong to a terrorist organization is to make a terroristic threat? Smoooth.
Are you pessimistic by nature yog?
If you don't believe in karma why then you worry?
I don't.
Posts: 25314
Threads: 239
Joined: August 26, 2010
Reputation:
156
RE: Atheism. The UNscientific belief (part two)
October 10, 2015 at 11:16 am
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist. This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair. Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second. That means there's a situation vacant.'
Posts: 3101
Threads: 10
Joined: September 7, 2015
Reputation:
49
RE: Atheism. The UNscientific belief (part two)
October 10, 2015 at 11:42 am
(This post was last modified: October 10, 2015 at 11:42 am by TheRocketSurgeon.)
(October 10, 2015 at 10:39 am)Little Rik Wrote: (October 10, 2015 at 10:29 am)Jörmungandr Wrote: (emphasis mine)
So your solution to people claiming you belong to a terrorist organization is to make a terroristic threat? Smoooth.
Are you pessimistic by nature yog?
If you don't believe in karma why then you worry?
A Christian told me: if you were saved you cant lose your salvation. you're sealed with the Holy Ghost
I replied: Can I refuse? Because I find the entire concept of vicarious blood sacrifice atonement to be morally abhorrent, the concept of holding flawed creatures permanently accountable for social misbehaviors and thought crimes to be morally abhorrent, and the concept of calling something "free" when it comes with the strings of subjugation and obedience perhaps the most morally abhorrent of all... and that's without even going into the history of justifying genocide, slavery, rape, misogyny, religious intolerance, and suppression of free speech which has been attributed by your own scriptures to your deity. I want a refund. I would burn happily rather than serve the monster you profess to love.
Posts: 4238
Threads: 29
Joined: March 15, 2013
Reputation:
9
RE: Atheism. The UNscientific belief (part two)
October 11, 2015 at 6:58 am
(October 10, 2015 at 11:42 am)TheRocketSurgeon Wrote: (October 10, 2015 at 10:39 am)Little Rik Wrote: Are you pessimistic by nature yog?
If you don't believe in karma why then you worry?
Rocket you must be the saviour and the rescuer of this thread. 
For months and months i desperately tried to find out whether atheism is based on dogma or not. 
Just yesterday i post few statements that atheists usually say like..........
..........the consciousness is a product of the brain.
..........with the physical death everything is over.
..........our consciousness come thanks to previous generations..........and so on.
Now i always believed that atheists got evidence for such statements but unfortunately
so far none of them was able to provide such evidence. 
But wait Rocket.
A reliable source just told me that YOU are the one who can do that. 
What a feeling of relieve Rocket. 
Now the atheism is finally safe because you are the one who finally will come up with solid evidence that such a statement are 100% correct. 
So atheism is not based on dogmas (official truth which are NOT based on evidence).
Well done Rocket.
Let us hear these SOLID evidences. 
Posts: 3541
Threads: 0
Joined: January 20, 2015
Reputation:
35
RE: Atheism. The UNscientific belief (part two)
October 11, 2015 at 7:15 am
(This post was last modified: October 11, 2015 at 7:23 am by Homeless Nutter.)
If you're so smart and your "intuitional b*llocks" are useful for anything - how come all you hindus live in such poverty, in shanty-towns made of garbage, begging, scamming, sh*ting and dying in the streets?
How come you have not a single proof for anything you say, despite alleged thousands of years of hindu "science"? 
How come the whole world thinks F***tard Randan Sarkar was a fraud and a terrorist, who brainwashed a bunch of idiots, in order to sexually abuse them? 
Anybody - even very very stupid and ignorant people - can make up sh*t. If you don't have proof for the sh*t you made up - that sh*t does not exist, as far rationality and science is concerned. 
Science works - magic is just an easy substitute for poor, dumb people, who are incapable of obtaining real, useful, demonstrable knowledge. 
  
You've been schooled...
"The fact that a believer is happier than a skeptic is no more to the point than the fact that a drunken man is happier than a sober one." - George Bernard Shaw
Posts: 25314
Threads: 239
Joined: August 26, 2010
Reputation:
156
RE: Atheism. The UNscientific belief (part two)
October 11, 2015 at 7:21 am
Ok, Rik, I'll put an end to your months of search. Please try to keep up; this is extremely complicated.
Ready? You may have to sit down for this.
Still with me?
Ok.
Here we go.
Is atheism based on dogma?
No.
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist. This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair. Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second. That means there's a situation vacant.'
Posts: 4238
Threads: 29
Joined: March 15, 2013
Reputation:
9
RE: Atheism. The UNscientific belief (part two)
October 11, 2015 at 8:25 am
(October 11, 2015 at 7:21 am)Stimbo Wrote: Ok, Rik, I'll put an end to your months of search. Please try to keep up; this is extremely complicated.
Ready? You may have to sit down for this.
Still with me?
Ok.
Here we go.
Is atheism based on dogma?
No.
Oh, my God! 
That means that my source of information was quite wrong!
It was you and not the Rocket that know how to get the magic evidence that would unlock
the mystery and the solution and turn a possible dogma into golden truth.
Well done mate Stim.
Good, let us hear about the evidence that those atheists statements are based on truth.
Oh, by the way you seem to be an expert on dogma.
Can you please give your version about the meaning of dogma.
I must have been wrong all my life.
I thought that a dogma is an official truth not based on evidence that can not be challenged.
Please Stim help Little Rik to understand.
Posts: 3541
Threads: 0
Joined: January 20, 2015
Reputation:
35
RE: Atheism. The UNscientific belief (part two)
October 11, 2015 at 8:34 am
(October 11, 2015 at 8:25 am)Little Rik Wrote: Oh, my God!
That means that my source of information was quite wrong!
[...]
Indeed. When your primary source of information is your a**e - that's bound to be the case.
"The fact that a believer is happier than a skeptic is no more to the point than the fact that a drunken man is happier than a sober one." - George Bernard Shaw
|
![[Image: extraordinarywoo-sig.jpg]](https://i.postimg.cc/zf86M5L7/extraordinarywoo-sig.jpg)
