(October 24, 2015 at 1:05 am)Huggy74 Wrote: 5 And the light shineth in darkness; and the darkness comprehended it not

Here it is stating the God WAS the singularity in the beginning in which all things existed.

Don't presume to know what god is composed of, do presume to alter the word of god to suit your own misguided purposes. k then.

(October 23, 2015 at 12:01 pm)Huggy74 Wrote:

(October 23, 2015 at 1:35 am)Minimalist Wrote: I don't have to see it to know creationism is bullshit.

Okay, so give us your version of how the universe came to exist.

So one has to have the actual answer to know that yours is utter tripe? Bullshit, Huggy.  

You may not know how a magician did his latest trick but you can rest assured that it wasn't by actual fucking magic. How would you react to someone telling you it was? I'd imagine in much the same way we react to your bullshit creation story. 

An honest "I don't know", or a presentation of the leading scientific theory for that matter, is a far better answer than an entirely fictitious one starring an ethereal sky-wizard speaking things into being.

(October 23, 2015 at 1:50 pm)Huggy74 Wrote: the reason you can't understand the concept of a "timeless creator", is because you're not spiritual. the bible states that God is a spirit,

Quote:John 4:24
God is a Spirit: and they that worship him must worship him in spirit and in truth.

can you tell me what a "spirit" is made of? If you don't know what a spirit is, how can you understand it's existence? The closest thing you'll get to describing God from a natural point of view, is as light.

Can you tell me what a spirit is made of, Huggy? Because if you can't, according to you, you don't know God. According to you, and the fact that a spirit has never shown itself to be measurable, nobody knows God.

You asked "If you don't know what a spirit is, how can you understand it's existence?" Naturally, I'd want to examine it in order to learn what it is or what it can do, but because its never been observed ever in the world anywhere, it's going to be real hard to understand its existence.

Understanding something's existence usually isn't that hard. You look at the thing as its sitting there existing, and you just sort of intuitively understand that that thing is sitting there existing. Knowing what that thing is or what it can do usually comes later; after you have established that it is, in fact, sitting there existing, not the other way around (unless you have a supported model that allows you to make a prediction, which still needs to be tested).

(October 24, 2015 at 4:41 am)houseofcantor Wrote:

(October 24, 2015 at 1:05 am)Huggy74 Wrote: 5 And the light shineth in darkness; and the darkness comprehended it not

Here it is stating the God WAS the singularity in the beginning in which all things existed.

Don't presume to know what god is composed of, do presume to alter the word of god to suit your own misguided purposes. k then.

What exactly did I alter? The Bible clearly states that in the beginning there was only God, and within him existed all creation. That by definition would make him an singularity.

http://www.thefreedictionary.com/singularity

Quote:singularity (ˌsɪŋɡjʊˈlærɪtɪ)
n, pl -ties
1. the state, fact, or quality of being singular
2. something distinguishing a person or thing from others
3. something remarkable or unusual
4. (Mathematics) maths
a. a point at which a function is not differentiable although it is differentiable in a neighbourhood of that point. See also pole24
b. another word for discontinuity
5. (Astronomy) astronomy a hypothetical point in space-time at which matter is infinitely compressed to infinitesimal volume

The natural realm and the spiritual realm use the same principles. If you take an apple seed for example, every apple that seed will ever produce already exist inside that seed, and once it is planted it will set out to accomplish it's purpose, which is to produce apples.

The WORD (who is God) Is the ORIGINAL seed, in him existed all things, and when that WORD is spoken it will set out to accomplish it's purpose.

Isaiah 55:11
So shall my word be that goeth forth out of my mouth: it shall not return unto me void, but it shall accomplish that which I please, and it shall prosper in the thing whereto I sent it.

(October 24, 2015 at 6:28 am)Starvald Demelain Wrote: So one has to have the actual answer to know that yours is utter tripe? Bullshit, Huggy.

To "know" something implies you have evidence to show that my position is utter tripe... care to present it?

(October 24, 2015 at 8:48 am)Huggy74 Wrote:

(October 24, 2015 at 4:41 am)houseofcantor Wrote: Don't presume to know what god is composed of, do presume to alter the word of god to suit your own misguided purposes. k then.

What exactly did I alter? The Bible clearly states that in the beginning there was only God, and within him existed all creation. That by definition would make him an singularity.

http://www.thefreedictionary.com/singularity

Quote:singularity (ˌsɪŋɡjʊˈlærɪtɪ)
n, pl -ties
1. the state, fact, or quality of being singular
2. something distinguishing a person or thing from others
3. something remarkable or unusual
4. (Mathematics) maths
a. a point at which a function is not differentiable although it is differentiable in a neighbourhood of that point. See also pole24
b. another word for discontinuity
5. (Astronomy) astronomy a hypothetical point in space-time at which matter is infinitely compressed to infinitesimal volume

In the context of the discussion, definition 5 is indicated. Note the lack of such terms as "light" and "darkness;" but you can just keep driving your disingenuous crazy train, I'm sure you will regardless.

Huggy, I am too lazy to back up in this thread to read any of your old posts. Are you a young earth creationist?

(October 24, 2015 at 8:55 am)houseofcantor Wrote:

(October 24, 2015 at 8:48 am)Huggy74 Wrote: What exactly did I alter? The Bible clearly states that in the beginning there was only God, and within him existed all creation. That by definition would make him an singularity.

http://www.thefreedictionary.com/singularity

In the context of the discussion, definition 5 is indicated. Note the lack of such terms as "light" and "darkness;" but you can just keep driving your disingenuous crazy train, I'm sure you will regardless.

As sure as the sun will rise. 

(October 24, 2015 at 8:55 am)Mermaid Wrote: Huggy, I am too lazy to read any of your old posts. Are you a young earth creationist?

No, he's way past "young". It's just an old picture... From the time when he wasn't fat.

(October 24, 2015 at 8:56 am)Homeless Nutter Wrote:

(October 24, 2015 at 8:55 am)Mermaid Wrote: Huggy, I am too lazy to read any of your old posts. Are you a young earth creationist?

No, he's way past "young". It's just an old picture... From the time when he wasn't fat.

The pic is not even a year old

Hey, YEC or not. He's a good lookin dude with a good lookin wife. Must be doing something right.