Please tell me if/why you cherrypick morality.

(November 23, 2015 at 5:17 am)ignoramus Wrote:

Good! That means you either accept both as ok, or you reject both as wrong. Otherwise, you have double standards, quite obvious, (and you know it too but won't admit it)

Consensual homosexuality is not wrong, by definition. Consensual bestiality is not possible.

When you have a spare minute from trolling, look up the definition of 'consensual'.

Boru

(November 23, 2015 at 5:29 am)Shaddam IV Wrote: Good! That means you either accept both as ok, or you reject both as wrong. Otherwise, you have double standards, quite obvious, (and you know it too but won't admit it)

If killing an animal is not wrong, then why killing a human is wrong? You either accept both, or you reject both as wrong. Otherwise, you have double standards, quite obvious, (and you know it too but won't admit it)

Animals are animals, humans are humans. Animals don't consent to sh*t. Sometimes we need double standards, because we're talking about two different things.

However, if you want to smear peanut butter on your genitals and have your dog consensually lick it off - hey, who am I to judge? Whatever keeps you from procreating...

(November 23, 2015 at 5:41 am)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: Consensual homosexuality is not wrong, by definition.  Consensual bestiality is not possible.  

When you have a spare minute from trolling, look up the definition of 'consensual'.

Boru

Liar. You're in denial.  Animals are known to hump anything and everything when they get the urge. A lot of them try to hump humans. Here's a **compilation** of Dog's trying to fuck a girl. There are so many videos on youtube of animals having interspecies sex from cats, to goats to even humans. We flagged them all:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=etthVXuOSgw

If you say animal consent doesn't exist now, you are CLEARLY in denial because your "pwecious wittle homo" degeneracy means a lot to you

---

(November 23, 2015 at 5:45 am)Homeless Nutter Wrote:

(November 23, 2015 at 5:29 am)Shaddam IV Wrote: Good! That means you either accept both as ok, or you reject both as wrong. Otherwise, you have double standards, quite obvious, (and you know it too but won't admit it)

If killing an animal is not wrong, then why killing a human is wrong? You either accept both, or you reject both as wrong. Otherwise, you have double standards, quite obvious, (and you know it too but won't admit it)

Animals are animals, humans are humans. Animals don't consent to sh*t. Sometimes we need double standards, because we're talking about two different things.

However, if you want to smear peanut butter on your genitals and have your dog consensually lick it off - hey, who am I to judge? Whatever keeps you from procreating...

That's exactly why I'm against Animal abuse genius. I'm vegetarian too.

Animals cannot give consent for us to have sex with them. And since we're in control of animals in general, we have a responsibility to show respect to them and not take advantage.

Mentally, I think they should be considered children in comparison to us. They can't fully understand what is happening, and even if they hump our leg that should not be considered an invitation to do what we want to it. That's my opinion anyway, I respect and care about animals.

None of this has the slightest thing to do with fully consensual sexual activity between any two particular adults.