Posts: 15351
Threads: 118
Joined: January 13, 2014
Reputation:
117
RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
January 16, 2016 at 3:04 am
No. This was action because of his repeated trolling behavior on the forum.
"There remain four irreducible objections to religious faith: that it wholly misrepresents the origins of man and the cosmos, that because of this original error it manages to combine the maximum servility with the maximum of solipsism, that it is both the result and the cause of dangerous sexual repression, and that it is ultimately grounded on wish-thinking." ~Christopher Hitchens, god is not Great
PM me your email address to join the Slack chat! I'll give you a taco(or five) if you join! --->There's an app and everything!<---
Posts: 30974
Threads: 204
Joined: July 19, 2011
Reputation:
141
RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
January 16, 2016 at 3:42 am
If we ever make use of that option, we'll say so.
Posts: 5356
Threads: 178
Joined: June 28, 2015
Reputation:
35
RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
January 16, 2016 at 6:09 am
(This post was last modified: January 16, 2016 at 6:11 am by ErGingerbreadMandude.)
Was he officially given a few warnings by the mods before he was permanently banned?
...I hope he was
Posts: 29107
Threads: 218
Joined: August 9, 2014
Reputation:
155
RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
January 16, 2016 at 6:24 am
(This post was last modified: January 16, 2016 at 6:25 am by robvalue.)
Good decision.
I still think it was a troll. It almost gave me a wink to say as much, but nothing that would count as actual evidence. It was utterly wasting everyone's time and disrupting everything.
Posts: 20476
Threads: 447
Joined: June 16, 2014
Reputation:
111
RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
January 16, 2016 at 8:22 am
On a side note, most referred to Delicate as a "he", others, as a "she"? Bio didn't say. Do we know for certain.
No God, No fear.
Know God, Know fear.
Posts: 13901
Threads: 263
Joined: January 11, 2009
Reputation:
82
RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
January 16, 2016 at 8:28 am
(January 16, 2016 at 8:22 am)ignoramus Wrote: On a side note, most referred to Delicate as a "he", others, as a "she"? Bio didn't say. Do we know for certain.
I seem to remember she said she was a woman in one of the threads. Can't remember which one.
You can fix ignorance, you can't fix stupid.
Tinkety Tonk and down with the Nazis.
Posts: 10470
Threads: 165
Joined: May 29, 2013
Reputation:
53
RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
January 16, 2016 at 9:50 am
I always thought Del was a guy. Never considered otherwise.
"For me, it is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring." - Carl Sagan
Posts: 25314
Threads: 239
Joined: August 26, 2010
Reputation:
156
RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
January 16, 2016 at 10:11 am
(January 16, 2016 at 6:09 am)pool the great Wrote: Was he officially given a few warnings by the mods before he was permanently banned?
...I hope he was
Warnings are private and thus we can't comment on them. However I will refer you to the comment immediately following yours.
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist. This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair. Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second. That means there's a situation vacant.'
