(January 25, 2016 at 12:33 pm)Minimalist Wrote: Don't strain your brain, drippy.  You're in over your head.  If we had anything like the documentation for your godboy that we have for Pontius Pilate there would be no discussions on the idea that jesus was a myth.  But we don't.  So the mythicist position is valid and growing.

We do old sport... The same 'historians' who identify Pilate also acknowledge Jesus in their works as well.

Wrong, shithead.

Philo never mentions your godboy and Josephus is a forgery.

(January 25, 2016 at 1:31 pm)Drich Wrote: where did you get "Ysiris"? I read the article and it translates the word in question on the Berlin fragment to be spelled "Ishrael" rather than the Israel of the Merneptah Stele. In the article you posted the Author who has written over 1000 books and articles says the "Berlin fragment's" spelling could be the direct result of the fact their they did not have dictionaries/common spellings in ancient Egypt., plus he points to the Idea this fragment could put "Ishrael" in the 13th century (The same as the movie) which could also account for the different spelling as 'Ishrael'. In that Israel may have simply been known by that name at that time.

Your link your information old sport. Maybe you should read before you post.

I believe Min is referring to two different stelae, the Berlin fragment and the Merneptah stele. Either way, this doesn't help as this is another conquest stele, and we're looking for, "Momuments that Identify Israel/the Jews as slaves in Egypt."

(January 25, 2016 at 2:05 pm)Jörmungandr Wrote:

(January 25, 2016 at 1:31 pm)Drich Wrote: where did you get "Ysiris"? I read the article and it translates the word in question on the Berlin fragment to be spelled "Ishrael" rather than the Israel of the Merneptah Stele. In the article you posted the Author who has written over 1000 books and articles says the "Berlin fragment's" spelling could be the direct result of the fact their they did not have dictionaries/common spellings in ancient Egypt., plus he points to the Idea this fragment could put "Ishrael" in the 13th century (The same as the movie) which could also account for the different spelling as 'Ishrael'. In that Israel may have simply been known by that name at that time.

Your link your information old sport. Maybe you should read before you post.

I believe Min is referring to two different stelae, the Berlin fragment and the Merneptah stele.  Either way, this doesn't help as this is another conquest stele, and we're looking for, "Momuments that Identify Israel/the Jews as slaves in Egypt."

I understand that.
What I was saying was that the Stalae monument's mentioning of the jews was translated "Israel"
and the berlin fragment was translated "IsHrael"
Per his own source material.

That link further explains that the berlin fragment probably dates to the 13th century (which is the time period the movie identifies as the time of the exodus) which was the probable reason for the difference in spelling (Change in pronunciation/dialect)

the "Ysiris or Isiris" or whatever he referenced is a nonsense term he made up, or got from one of his nut bag bloggers he likes to quote. I googled it and the only reference english or egyptian reference I found in 10 pages to that word was his old posts claiming the same thing, being backed up by nothing.

(January 25, 2016 at 1:46 pm)Minimalist Wrote: Wrong, shithead.

Philo never mentions your godboy and Josephus is a forgery.

:Roflol: says a man who quotes guys who claim the 'problem with 'Merica is the constitution!"

Maybe you should wander back to the shallow end of the pool old sport, and try and defend the hot mess you have already made, before you go and make yourself another.

The problem with 'murrica IS the constitution, asswipe.  Although you are far too stupid to understand why.

That xtian shithead ascribes...or tries to ascribe...the spelling difference to changes in the language over a couple of hundred years.  He conveniently ignores the fact that the inscription on the Berlin pedestal is broken which might be an even easier observation if he didn't have an agenda to push.  ( He's trying to push the exodus back to the mid 15th century BC c 1450), which is what fundies insist on, not your Rohl horseshit.

Ever notice how xtian asswipes...Drippy, I'm talking about you...seize on the Merneptah stele as ironclad "proof" of their precious fucking Israel but ignore the rest of the line which says they were utterly destroyed?  Talk about cherry picking!


Jorm, you may find the attached interesting. Unlike Drippy, you'll be able to understand it.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Merneptah_Stele

There is a translation of the hieroglyphs for the line in question.  People seem to use "y" and "i" interchangeably.  Remember, we are dealing with Egyptian, here.

(January 25, 2016 at 4:20 pm)Drich Wrote: the "Ysiris or Isiris" or whatever he referenced is a nonsense term he made up, or got from one of his nut bag bloggers he likes to quote. I googled it and the only reference english or egyptian reference I found in 10 pages to that word was his old posts claiming the same thing, being backed up by nothing.

It's right there in the Wikipedia article on the stele.

Drippy should be an expert on nonsense with all that time he wastes reading that stupid fucking bible.

What he knows about archaeology could dance on the head of a pin.....along with his fucking angels.

(January 24, 2016 at 4:01 pm)Drich Wrote:

(January 24, 2016 at 3:57 pm)Brakeman Wrote: I keep waiting for Drich's "reliable scientific sources" to announce the finding of his god's magic fairy dust bag that he used while making all of these exodus miracles.  It'll be so amazing when the nuclear physicists discover the awesome nuclear power of the magic walking stick moses used.  Virologists will be amazed when the discover the RNA of the 0ne night lifespan epidemic that for "Science reasons" only affected firstborn males without blood over their doorway. Biologists will be amazed how frogs can reproduce beyond their food sources. Yep any day now, the completely dumb-ass story is going to be vindicated by Drich's awesome sources..

Did you not read the OP? I pointed to the source material there.

OOOOooooh! Sparkly magic sources!!! Woohoo!

The magic sources must have magically fallen off your post!

It must have looked like this:

 
and here must be your source you were referring to:



ROFL!

Oh! I hear they found moses' magic staff and his magic tiara!

(January 25, 2016 at 9:09 pm)Brakeman Wrote:

(January 24, 2016 at 4:01 pm)Drich Wrote: Did you not read the OP? I pointed to the source material there.

OOOOooooh! Sparkly magic sources!!! Woohoo!

The magic sources must have magically fallen off your post!

It must have looked like this:

 
and here must be your source you were referring to:



ROFL!

Oh! I hear they found moses' magic staff and his magic tiara!

^