I classify myself as an anti-theist because I see the submission to belief in gods as inherently bad to people and mankind... I got nothing else to add, that's just my position.

(February 4, 2016 at 4:27 pm)Dystopia Wrote: I classify myself as an anti-theist because I see the submission to belief in gods as inherently bad to people and mankind... I got nothing else to add, that's just my position.

And how would you feel about the submission of theists to godlessness?  Just wondering.  Is that something you'd take any way you could get it?

(February 4, 2016 at 12:33 pm)Divinity Wrote: I'm a Deist, but also an anti-theist.  I think religion is pure bullshit.  It teaches people to hate.  So fuck religion.

I'd have a one on one debate and logical discussion on you on Deism vs religion. I think Deism is illogical. I was a Deist for five years.

(February 4, 2016 at 4:50 pm)MysticKnight Wrote:

(February 4, 2016 at 12:33 pm)Divinity Wrote: I'm a Deist, but also an anti-theist.  I think religion is pure bullshit.  It teaches people to hate.  So fuck religion.

I'd have a one on one debate and logical discussion on you on Deism vs religion. I think Deism is illogical. I was a Deist for five years.

But how would we know if your debate would be logical after five years of self imposed illogic?  (Have you had it checked?)

(February 4, 2016 at 4:50 pm)MysticKnight Wrote: I'd have a one on one debate and logical discussion on you on Deism vs religion. I think Deism is illogical. I was a Deist for five years.

Deism is less illogical than Religion.  Religion requires the belief that the people who wrote the religious texts were:

#1. Inspired by god
#2. Completely honest about being inspired by god
#3. Did not add or change anything to what they wrote

Deism is merely the belief that there is a god, and that this god does not intervene.  You're free to point out the lack of logic of Deism, but be warned that you'll turn me Atheist, rather than religious if you manage to change my mind.

(February 4, 2016 at 5:03 pm)Divinity Wrote:

(February 4, 2016 at 4:50 pm)MysticKnight Wrote: I'd have a one on one debate and logical discussion on you on Deism vs religion. I think Deism is illogical. I was a Deist for five years.

Deism is less illogical than Religion.  Religion requires the belief that the people who wrote the religious texts were:

#1. Inspired by god
#2. Completely honest about being inspired by god
#3. Did not add or change anything to what they wrote

Deism is merely the belief that there is a god, and that this god does not intervene.  You're free to point out the lack of logic of Deism, but be warned that you'll turn me Atheist, rather than religious if you manage to change my mind.

Do you want to have one on one debate about it? Not in the mood of facing everyone.

Sure. I'll debate. Never been much of a debator.

(February 4, 2016 at 5:11 pm)Divinity Wrote: Sure.  I'll debate.  Never been much of a debator.

1 introduction, 7 responses each? Official debate in the official debate section?

Is the debate Deism is illogical, or is the debate Deism is more illogical than religion?

(February 4, 2016 at 5:15 pm)Divinity Wrote: Is the debate Deism is illogical, or is the debate Deism is more illogical than religion?

Deism is illogical. Whether there exists a true religion or that there is no such thing as either claims from Deism or religion, is up to you after that. But I can do either. Whatever you want.