(April 16, 2016 at 8:31 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote:

(April 16, 2016 at 8:17 pm)Chad32 Wrote: Hit a child, and it's called discipline. Hit an adult, and it's called assault. I think that's the main reason they pick the rear end to hit as well, because you get a different reaction when you hit a kid in a place where the public can see it.

Tell you what, then - the next time the girl at the shop short-changes you or the waiter spills a drink in your lap, swat them on the bum five or six times.  Let me know the results.

Boru

Not sure what your intention was in this response. Chad is agreeing with you.

(April 16, 2016 at 8:33 pm)Crossless1 Wrote:

(April 16, 2016 at 8:31 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: Tell you what, then - the next time the girl at the shop short-changes you or the waiter spills a drink in your lap, swat them on the bum five or six times.  Let me know the results.

Boru

Not sure what your intention was in this response. Chad is agreeing with you.

Chad's already admitted to hitting his nieces.  I'm not sure how that qualifies as 'agreeing'.  More to the point, adults are allowed to hit children solely because they are children, and Chad's argument seems to be that bum swats are the primary difference.  My point is that if you hit an adult for the same reason and in the same manner as people hit children, the consequences are different.

Boru

(April 16, 2016 at 8:36 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote:

(April 16, 2016 at 8:33 pm)Crossless1 Wrote: Not sure what your intention was in this response. Chad is agreeing with you.

Chad's already admitted to hitting his nieces.  I'm not sure how that qualifies as 'agreeing'.  More to the point, adults are allowed to hit children solely because they are children, and Chad's argument seems to be that bum swats are the primary difference.  My point is that if you hit an adult for the same reason and in the same manner as people hit children, the consequences are different.

Boru

Ah, I'd skimmed through and missed the part about the nieces.

Carry on.

(April 16, 2016 at 8:36 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote:

(April 16, 2016 at 8:33 pm)Crossless1 Wrote: Not sure what your intention was in this response. Chad is agreeing with you.

Chad's already admitted to hitting his nieces.  I'm not sure how that qualifies as 'agreeing'.  More to the point, adults are allowed to hit children solely because they are children, and Chad's argument seems to be that bum swats are the primary difference.  My point is that if you hit an adult for the same reason and in the same manner as people hit children, the consequences are different.

Boru

I am agreeing with you. I'm not saying hitting my nieces is a good thing. I'm just saying my dad was shit at bringing me up in a way that allows me to raise a kid without getting physical.

If you agree with me, then stop hitting your nieces.

Boru

(April 16, 2016 at 8:54 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: If you agree with me, then stop hitting your nieces.

Boru

Ok, deal. I'm just glad I don't have to live with them.

(April 16, 2016 at 11:56 am)Drich Wrote: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t8hvpg43ZyY

This warms the heart to see this little brat being held accountable to his actions. There is hope in those tears IF and only if the parents show the same consistent resolve at home!

If you Spare the rod, You will Spoil (make no good) a Child!

Several comments. First, I was spanked twice as a child. Both times were immediate and a reprisal for nth time time I did the same small irritating thing in a row. Neither did more than sting. Both taught me about trying people's patience. Neither suggested spanking was a good means of child raising.

I watched a teacher spank a second grader in the same immediate way. My sympathy then and now was with the teacher.

But spanking as a regular, let alone formal form of punishment is in effective at best, and abusive at worst.

What your video shows is abusive and counter productive. The spanners are ineffective. They can't even seem go get the job done. The spanking is obviously long after the crime (useless for a child that age). Arbitrary adult abuse is probably the message received.

I noticed that we aren't told what the boy did. I suspect that there is a reason for that.

But my big question is, you find it heart warming? What kind of sadist are you?

(April 16, 2016 at 11:56 am)Drich Wrote: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t8hvpg43ZyY

This warms the heart to see this little brat being held accountable to his actions. There is hope in those tears IF and only if the parents show the same consistent resolve at home!

If you Spare the rod, You will Spoil (make no good) a Child!

You're disgusting, and this video is disgusting, and now I'm convinced you're a troll.   You're an ugly black cloud of hate and negativity on this forum, and I only hope some day you do something which gets you banned.  What a loving witness for Christ you are.

https://youtu.be/FbgLrY8pql8

For context and these people should be sued

Just remember the law:

"These Are The 19 States That Still Let Public Schools Hit Kids"
 
Mar. 28, 2014, 11:55 AM  
"In 19 states, it's legal for teachers or principals to punish public school students by hitting them repeatedly instead of just giving them detention."
http://www.businessinsider.com/19-states...ent-2014-3

"France Is Rebuked Over Corporal Punishment by Parents"
MARCH 4, 2015

"France has gotten a diplomatic slap on the wrist over spanking.

The Council of Europe faulted the country on Wednesday for failing to fully and clearly ban the corporal punishment of children, as it committed to do under a European treaty. The council’s ruling stemmed from a complaint lodged two years ago against France and several other European countries by a British child protection organization.

The ruling is a symbolic one, with no penalty attached, and the French government has no plans to respond with legislation. Even so, it has revived a long debate in France over the propriety of physically disciplining children, a practice banned in the nation’s schools but not in family settings."
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/03/05/world/....html?_r=0

The US is not Russia:

"Banned in 1917. Article 336 of the Labor Code of the Russian Federation states that a teacher who has used corporal punishment to a pupil (even once), shall be dismissed."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/School_cor..._Provinces