(May 22, 2016 at 3:11 pm)Janice_Spokes Wrote: I just think its best to be plain-spoken as opposed to.. dishonest.

You mean like equivocating the meaning of "baby"?

Troll.

I think this one's a Catholic. They're the ones who're usually addicted to the idea that we suffer in order to learn how to be godly.

While "Poe's Law" is always in effect, I'm pretty sure this one is the real deal. The mimicry of the Christian programmed-thinking language is too perfect.

(May 22, 2016 at 3:20 pm)Cthulhu Dreaming Wrote:

(May 22, 2016 at 3:11 pm)Janice_Spokes Wrote: I just think its best to be plain-spoken as opposed to.. dishonest.

You mean like equivocating the meaning of "baby"?

Troll.

What do you mean it's not a baby? The "fetus" starts growing finger nails, and has a heartbeat within weeks of its conception.

Why is it, that when Princess Kate was pregnant people weren't talking about the "royal clump of cells?"

Why is it that when a woman miscarries (in polite society anyway) people are in sorrow over her lost child, and never tell her "it was a clump of cells, get over it!" Maybe they say that in New York City, but not anywhere I've ever been!

Im just saying, even if it's not an actual baby, its enough of a baby to matter. Its not a clump of hamburger meat, but atheists seem to treat it as such.

(May 22, 2016 at 3:07 pm)Janice_Spokes Wrote: [...]I have 4 children and love them all dearly. Thankfully, none are retarded but I doubt I could ever bring myself to kill one, even if it was.

What do you all think of this practice of "screening" unborn babies before ending them?

Unnecessary. "Retarded" or not - babies all taste the same to me...

That's what's wrong with atheists, they hate pain and suffering...I've never felt so vindicated in my wrongness before...

(May 22, 2016 at 3:19 pm)Janice_Spokes Wrote: Thats what I think atheists are missing. They kind of hate pain and suffering, and think its bad all the time. Pain and suffering isn't a country dance, but it can help you be close to God. In all your pain and sorrow, you can say to yourself "Jesus, I know this is nothing compared to what you went through on calvary. Please help and be with me."

I thought you were here to learn about us?

You've clearly already made up your mind as to who we are, so what's the point of this charade?

(May 22, 2016 at 3:23 pm)Janice_Spokes Wrote: What do you mean it's not a baby?

Not until it's born, no. Buy a dictionary, would ya? Words mean things.

Calling a fetus a baby is nothing but an appeal to emotion.

Oh, and stop trolling.

(May 22, 2016 at 3:23 pm)TheRocketSurgeon Wrote: I think this one's a Catholic. They're the ones who're usually addicted to the idea that we suffer in order to learn how to be godly.

While "Poe's Law" is always in effect, I'm pretty sure this one is the real deal. The mimicry of the Christian programmed-thinking language is too perfect.

Im not a Roman Catholic. I am a Christian and I only believe in the Bible. Not Popes, not Mary, not praying to the dead or "Earning your way to heaven." We are saved by Jesus' love and nothing else.

Still Roman Catholics have something of the spirit of Christ with them. That Pope of theirs seems like a nice guy!

Im talking about my own life. When things get tough, I tend to focus on God more. Thats all.

(May 22, 2016 at 3:23 pm)Janice_Spokes Wrote:

(May 22, 2016 at 3:20 pm)Cthulhu Dreaming Wrote: You mean like equivocating the meaning of "baby"?

Troll.

What do you mean it's not a baby? The "fetus" starts growing finger nails, and has a heartbeat within weeks of its conception.

Why is it, that when Princess Kate was pregnant people weren't talking about the "royal clump of cells?"

Why is it that when a woman miscarries (in polite society anyway) people are in sorrow over her lost child, and never tell her "it was a clump of cells, get over it!" Maybe they say that in New York City, but not anywhere I've ever been!

Im just saying, even if it's not an actual baby, its enough of a baby to matter. Its not a clump of hamburger meat, but atheists seem to treat it as such.

The one time I want to hear from Tibbers about abortion just to shut this woman up hehe

(May 22, 2016 at 3:19 pm)Janice_Spokes Wrote:

(May 22, 2016 at 3:14 pm)downbeatplumb Wrote: Screening is an excellent idea as long as it's used for things that would otherwise lead to long term suffering or other problems. you have 4 children, what if one of them had a condition that demanded 24 hour a day care? the lives of the other 3 would suffer as would you, now what if that could be avoided?

You mean would I cut him/her out of my womb before they were born? No of course not.

So you would inflict lifelong suffering and hardship on multiple individuals purely for your own selfish self righteousness, for shame Janice for shame.