Well Steve, like I said, each Christian can just believe whatever they want.

Plenty of people have provided us with that very belief. My original point was to advise you not to generalise, because saying Christians do not believe we get punished for Adam's actions is simply wrong. Some think it, some don't.

How odd, I'm normally asking theists not to generalise atheists. Now I'm asking a theist not to generalise groups of theists. Oh well.

Seriously, a Christian can believe absolutely anything. Who is going to stop them? If they say they're a Christian, you can point and them and tell them they're not, but your validation is not required.

Of course, joining certain individual sects may require some sort of action.

Yeabut they're only a true Christian if they agree with Steve.

(June 11, 2016 at 6:40 pm)robvalue Wrote: Well Steve, like I said, each Christian can just believe whatever they want.
 

That's the problem when discussing anything with Christians, they all argue something different .... I suspect they even change their actual previous beliefs just to win an argument ... arguing against someone that can make stuff up from made up stuff as they go along is so frustrating 

Irrational beliefs are defended irrationally. There's no desire to be consistent, only to blather nothings in response as if any answer spoken is a valid one.

Yeah... sadly they don't win the argument even when they're allowed to make stuff up and change it. Well, as long as they're at least required to have some sort of internal consistency within their beliefs, and correlation with reality. If that's not required of them, they can "win" just by having contradictory beliefs, which cover all situations, and which needn't be troubled by actual evidence.

What they can do is continue to argue until I get fed up and quit.

I'm not aiming this post at anyone in particular.

(June 11, 2016 at 6:45 pm)madog Wrote:

(June 11, 2016 at 6:40 pm)robvalue Wrote: Well Steve, like I said, each Christian can just believe whatever they want.
 

That's the problem when discussing anything with Christians, they all argue something different .... I suspect they even change their actual previous beliefs just to win an argument ... arguing against someone that can make stuff up from made up stuff as they go along is so frustrating 

Have you ever played make believe with a small child?

No actually you can't destroy my evil minions with your laser eyes because you don't have them anymore because you sneezed and now you a bunny with no teeth. No you can't grow new teeth because it's against the new rule I just made that says you can't grow teeth if you're a bunny.

(June 11, 2016 at 6:49 pm)SteveII Wrote:  

To be more precise you have to understand the before and after. Before Adam's sin he was righteous and could stand before God (in his presence) "as-is" blameless, without fault, a perfect being, made in the image of God, higher than the angels. After sin, approaching God is no longer possible--he was tainted. The fall was significant because of how high his status was to start. Adam could not help but pass on that tainted state to his offspring. Therefore we inherit a sin nature--a state that requires some kind of repair if we are to get back to the original state.

In other words:

A bunch of poorly thought out fictional hooey written by some deranged individual.

That's your interpretation Steve. You don't get to speak for all Christians.