(June 13, 2016 at 7:45 am)Thomas Kelly252525 Wrote:

(June 13, 2016 at 5:01 am)Constable Dorfl Wrote: Awww, is poor widdle Wooters crying because others are being mean to his delusions?

Well, I got news for you Chad, you're big enough and old enough now that your balls should have dropped and you should be able to take a bit of debate without pissing yor pampers.

Constable Dorfl.

I don't mean this arrogantly.

Is it your intention to use people like a toy in sport ?

Even if I disagree with someone and think their thinking isn't wise, I don't think it's humane to use them like a toy in sport.

Wooters is an arrogant, insulting, ignorant piece of work. I take great pleasure in ripping his sad little delusions apart.

(June 13, 2016 at 3:47 pm)popsthebuilder Wrote: Like I said; grow up.

I totally understand. When you hold an indefensible position, the most rational option is to give up (except for accepting facts of course, but we both know that you're not going to do that).

Oh, well - if you ever come up with anything resembling a coherent argument why omnipotent god can't change the laws of physics at will, or why omniscient god can't do so without your knowledge - let me know...

(June 14, 2016 at 5:56 am)Homeless Nutter Wrote:

(June 13, 2016 at 3:47 pm)popsthebuilder Wrote: Like I said; grow up.

I totally understand. When you hold an indefensible position, the most rational option is to give up (except for accepting facts of course, but we both know that you're not going to do that).

Oh, well - if you ever come up with anything resembling a coherent argument why omnipotent god can't change the laws of physics at will, or why omniscient god can't do so without your knowledge - let me know...

Cool.

When you devise a reason for GOD to do such, let me know.

Also; none of what you have said is fact, at all.
You claiming such is further proof of your deception.

Peace

Faith in selfless Unity for Good.

(June 14, 2016 at 5:45 am)Constable Dorfl Wrote:

(June 13, 2016 at 7:45 am)Thomas Kelly252525 Wrote: Constable Dorfl.

I don't mean this arrogantly.

Is it your intention to use people like a toy in sport ?

Even if I disagree with someone and think their thinking isn't wise, I don't think it's humane to use them like a toy in sport.

Wooters is an arrogant, insulting, ignorant piece of work. I take great pleasure in ripping his sad little delusions apart.

Constable Dorfl,

I hope you will be able to use words in a medicinal way like a doctor working in a hospital, revealing your skills and releasing people from their misleading state of being.

(June 14, 2016 at 9:16 am)Thomas Kelly252525 Wrote:

(June 14, 2016 at 5:45 am)Constable Dorfl Wrote: Wooters is an arrogant, insulting, ignorant piece of work. I take great pleasure in ripping his sad little delusions apart.

Constable Dorfl,

I hope you will be able to use words in a medicinal way like a doctor working in a hospital, revealing your skills and releasing people from their misleading state of being.

Nah, I use them like a retrophrenologist would use his selection of mallets.

(June 13, 2016 at 7:45 am)Thomas Kelly252525 Wrote: Is it your intention to use people like a toy in sport ?

This is an atheist site and it is filled with canines and felines, and a theist is just another chew toy. There are some that are fun and enjoyable to play with, but there are also some that just get ripped apart.

It all depends on how the theist plays. Some come in and, within one post, have put themselves into the 'rip it up" toy slot. Most are just redundantly annoying, presenting 'proofs' that have all been refuted here and elsewhere. A select few have actually tried to participate in intelligent and meaningful conversation.

So, yeah. When you walk in our door, you are already viewed as a chew toy, however, it is up to you to choose the category.

I am a Kittencorn. I don't chew theists ever. Too sour. K

(June 14, 2016 at 6:38 pm)IATIA Wrote:

(June 13, 2016 at 7:45 am)Thomas Kelly252525 Wrote: Is it your intention to use people like a toy in sport ?

This is an atheist site and it is filled with canines and felines, and a theist is just another chew toy.  There are some that are fun and enjoyable to play with, but there are also some that just get ripped apart.

It all depends on how the theist plays.  Some come in and, within one post, have put themselves into the 'rip it up" toy slot.  Most are just redundantly annoying, presenting 'proofs' that have all been refuted here and elsewhere.  A select few have actually tried to participate in intelligent and meaningful conversation.

So, yeah.  When you walk in our door, you are already viewed as a chew toy, however, it is up to you to choose the category.

IATIA,

I think it's right that a person sometimes tell others their thoughts about things to show what their understanding is, including about simple things.  I've had thoughts for a long time of atheists playing with theists.  You might view me as a chew toy right now, people change their minds sometimes.  Your post appeared to be a helpful one.  Maybe it's right to thank you for that.

(June 14, 2016 at 6:38 pm)IATIA Wrote:

(June 13, 2016 at 7:45 am)Thomas Kelly252525 Wrote: Is it your intention to use people like a toy in sport ?

This is an atheist site and it is filled with canines and felines, and a theist is just another chew toy.  There are some that are fun and enjoyable to play with, but there are also some that just get ripped apart.

It all depends on how the theist plays.  Some come in and, within one post, have put themselves into the 'rip it up" toy slot.  Most are just redundantly annoying, presenting 'proofs' that have all been refuted here and elsewhere.  A select few have actually tried to participate in intelligent and meaningful conversation.

So, yeah.  When you walk in our door, you are already viewed as a chew toy, however, it is up to you to choose the category.

I like the chewy kind the annoyng kind go into the do not reply bin.

I like the stuffed ones. Especially feathers. Nothing like a cloud of feathers to make ones day!