(June 24, 2016 at 7:25 am)Disciple Wrote: You know, what we also need is common sense bomb legislation. We also would do good to have some type of murder regulations I think. Laws in place to ban all drugs including alcohol too. If we could just get murder banned then we wouldn't have to even worry about the guns and peoples freedoms to defend themselves in any way they see fit right? Laws don't stop a damn thing is why that all seems absurd. Why is it that so called assault rifles are used in less than 5% of murders but that's what all the anti-gun propaganda is about? Shouldn't you be more worried about handguns? More people are killed with knives and falling in the bathtub than with "assault rifles" each year.  BTW good luck getting all of them off the streets. One gun shop in Georgia in the last week sold 15,000 AR's.  And I would wager, none of them will ever kill a human.  Stop letting our illegitimate government frighten you so easily. They're trying to disarm you.

 That is fucking absurd, "Laws don't stop a damned thing". Not entirely no, of course not. But they are a social contract, and without them you'd either end up with a dictator like Un, or a warlord society like Somalia. Speed limits don't stop speeding either, so why do we still have them?

It is not anti-gun like the paranoid gun nuts think it is. Liberals own gun too, and there is no political party oath litmus test to own one. Bans on certain types or big clips is not saying take away every single weapon. That is a bullshit slippery slope on par with theists saying, "If gay marriage exists, next thing will be making child molesting legal".

It is the same as saying, you can have a car you just cant drive a 5 lane wide monster truck on a public highway. Just like you can have a car, but you cant speed 100mph in a school zone.

And who the fuck says we shouldn't worry about handguns too, yes we should. Because handguns have been used in suicides and accidental and domestic murder, which actually is the majority of gun death. 

Other bad shit happens so do nothing? Nope, sorry, not going to work.

You have been brainwashed into equating "regulation" to "all out ban". Those mean two completely different things.

(June 24, 2016 at 8:20 am)Brian37 Wrote: Ok so the second time in less than a week, I got a gun nutter to say, "no Brian, you should not be allowed to own a gun". Why, because I was cussing and acting crazy. EXACTLY MY POINT YOU DUMBASSES.

So today I was called "irrational" and a "ranting baby'...... They cant have it both ways. It is the same cherry picking you get with theists. They mean what they mean until they mean something different.

YES we should keep guns out of the hands of the "irrational".

But here is where they are wrong. They want to equate rightful anger to death, and a desire to reduce it as the same as being "irrational".

But doesn't matter to me. I agree why the fuck would you trust "irrational" people with firearms? Same bullshit screaming GOP did running away from their own words when Obama modeled the ACA after Romney's state model.

So religious "irrational" people should have or not have access to weapons?

Gun nutters, " No they should not have access to weapons".

Sane people, " We agree, so lets do something about it."

Gun nutters, "NO"

I will donate a gun to you. You need one.

(June 24, 2016 at 11:38 am)KUSA Wrote:

(June 24, 2016 at 8:20 am)Brian37 Wrote: Ok so the second time in less than a week, I got a gun nutter to say, "no Brian, you should not be allowed to own a gun". Why, because I was cussing and acting crazy. EXACTLY MY POINT YOU DUMBASSES.

So today I was called "irrational" and a "ranting baby'...... They cant have it both ways. It is the same cherry picking you get with theists. They mean what they mean until they mean something different.

YES we should keep guns out of the hands of the "irrational".

But here is where they are wrong. They want to equate rightful anger to death, and a desire to reduce it as the same as being "irrational".

But doesn't matter to me. I agree why the fuck would you trust "irrational" people with firearms? Same bullshit screaming GOP did running away from their own words when Obama modeled the ACA after Romney's state model.

So religious "irrational" people should have or not have access to weapons?

Gun nutters, " No they should not have access to weapons".

Sane people, " We agree, so lets do something about it."

Gun nutters, "NO"

I will donate a gun to you. You need one.

What the fuck is that supposed to mean? I haven't touched any fire arm since I was 18 and I am 49 and I have absolutely no desire to ever touch one. Unless you are a cop or military or a security guard, I have no desire to be around any civilian with a firearm. You bring one in my presence I will leave your presence.

Here you go Brian. Will you leave now?

The amusing bit, is that plenty of people will see that image above and think that it's "different" , somehow, than this.....



...and then wonder why nutballs are worried that gun banners are coming after their guns.

(June 24, 2016 at 1:46 pm)Rhythm Wrote: The amusing bit, is that plenty of people will see that image above and think that it's "different" , somehow, than this.....



...and then wonder why nutballs are worried that gun banners are coming after their guns.

Yeah, especially those who know who Charles Whitman was.

(June 24, 2016 at 1:42 pm)KUSA Wrote: Here you go Brian. Will you leave now?

Thanks for proving my point asshole. If in reality your motive is to show off in front of other people to the point of intimidating them, dont fancy yourself as a hero, you are a fucking bully.  Why is it I can walk in public without a firearm but you cant? You too much of a pussy to be seen in public without one?

What's supposed to be intimidating about that squirrel gun?  You can't even hunt deer with it in some states because it's been deemed to be insufficiently lethal...........
(it's because it's black, isn't it...lol ....no, seriously that -is- why, whether you realized that beforehand or not, hence the moniker "the black rifle" for all of the thousands of variants)

(June 24, 2016 at 4:21 pm)Brian37 Wrote:

(June 24, 2016 at 1:42 pm)KUSA Wrote: Here you go Brian. Will you leave now?

Thanks for proving my point asshole. If in reality your motive is to show off in front of other people to the point of intimidating them, dont fancy yourself as a hero, you are a fucking bully.  Why is it I can walk in public without a firearm but you cant? You too much of a pussy to be seen in public without one?

When I am in public, I am not seen with a gun. If you see my gun I expect it is going to be too late for you.

You are the bully though. Look at your foul language and intimidating tone. You want to bully me out of my rights.

You even admit that you are an irrational depressed individual. You should just let smarter better people than yourself figure things out.

Now go let mommy rock you to sleep.