Your article is from November, 2014.  Had you done a little research you would have found that the bomb charges were not added until April, 2015.  As far as why, goes?  You'd have to ask the FBI and I doubt they'll tell you.

http://www.stltoday.com/news/local/crime...a044f.html

Quote: Bomb charges added against two men who allegedly wanted to blow up the Gateway Arch

• By Leah Thorsen St. Louis Post-Dispatch
  
• Apr 3, 2015
  

(June 23, 2016 at 10:56 pm)Minimalist Wrote: Your article is from November, 2014.  Had you done a little research you would have found that the bomb charges were not added until April, 2015.  As far as why, goes?  You'd have to ask the FBI and I doubt they'll tell you.

http://www.stltoday.com/news/local/crime...a044f.html

Quote: Bomb charges added against two men who allegedly wanted to blow up the Gateway Arch

• By Leah Thorsen St. Louis Post-Dispatch
  
• Apr 3, 2015
  

My point was that they aren't white and aren't being called terrorists in one article.  What relevance does the date or charges added have?  The term "Terrorist" was still around way back in November 2014

Oh, look. Poor whitey nationalist is attacked again. Warrants some counter action, of course. Can't have that, since we're always that oppressed that it gets hard to breathe.

(June 24, 2016 at 5:19 am)paulpablo Wrote:

(June 23, 2016 at 10:56 pm)Minimalist Wrote: Your article is from November, 2014.  Had you done a little research you would have found that the bomb charges were not added until April, 2015.  As far as why, goes?  You'd have to ask the FBI and I doubt they'll tell you.

http://www.stltoday.com/news/local/crime...a044f.html

My point was that they aren't white and aren't being called terrorists in one article.  What relevance does the date or charges added have?  The term "Terrorist" was still around way back in November 2014

They were initially charged with only technical weapons violations.... probably, and this is just a guess... because the FBI informant who sold them the bomb may have entrapped them or seemed to.  It took quite a while to straighten that out.

I suppose you could ask the reporters and editors why they chose the words they did.

Also I was unable to find a follow up story to the April, 2015 piece.  Probably plea-bargained out.

(June 23, 2016 at 5:54 pm)abaris Wrote: They're usually too stupid to be deserving of the title of terrorist.

As a average KKK member would say 
Them terrorists be brown you see me and my pa and family are warriors or jesus.
Them brown people are warriors of the devil named yaweh and moohamed. 

Both groups are terrible terrible human following a ancient book committing atrocities
in the name of the same god and are just ignorant to no end....

(June 24, 2016 at 6:25 pm)Minimalist Wrote:

(June 24, 2016 at 5:19 am)paulpablo Wrote: My point was that they aren't white and aren't being called terrorists in one article.  What relevance does the date or charges added have?  The term "Terrorist" was still around way back in November 2014

They were initially charged with only technical weapons violations.... probably, and this is just a guess... because the FBI informant who sold them the bomb may have entrapped them or seemed to.  It took quite a while to straighten that out.

I suppose you could ask the reporters and editors why they chose the words they did.

Also I was unable to find a follow up story to the April, 2015 piece.  Probably plea-bargained out.

The charges or the dates have no relevance.

The point is that it's not due to their skin colour that they aren't called terrorists.

The IRA are known as terrorists, the kkk and so on.

For some reason these people get called militia members which can basically be another word for terrorists anyway.

People who commit violence at soccer games often get called hooligans whereas people who commit street crimes may get called thugs.

Terrorist is a negative stereotype of mainly being Muslim these days rather than any skin colour, there are a few notorious white Muslim terrorists.

My guess is as good as anyone else's as to why this group of white people and those two black people didn't get called terrorists in these two articles but

1 it doesn't bother me because it's not like the articles are making the suspects look innocent.

2) the articles are clearly stating that these are members of a militia which plotted to bomb something.

I think it's basically race baiting to look over articles and speculate on racial conspiracies where white people never get called terrorist just on the basis of one news topic.

I suspect the reason why the media calls them militia men and not terrorists is because the media in general likes to consistently use catchy labels and titles for things for headlines, these people have always been known as "those crazy militia members" and the fact that militia can be used interchangeably with terrorists anyway.

It's too simple?

So many of humans (not just Americans) are chose the mainstream media to do the thinking for them. Left is where the mainstream media says so; right is where the mainstream media points at. 

For years, the Mexican drug cartels were carrying on "signature executions" with the method of beheading; the executions hit rival gangs, civilians and women too. But it never got media coverage. Mainstream media never gave that any covering, you never hear about "Los Zetas", you also never hear about "The gulf cartels"; but you always (and always) hear about a Muslim flip-flop wearing, skinny Muslim in the Afghani mountains, or a Muslim faggot who is -ironically- an Afghani also, always in locations which the United States own, invaded, or simply present on.

Beheading wasn't a shock for years, it never gets any coverage except in Hollywood drug movies, but out of a suddin, Liberals (Americans and  non Americans), are crying like whores over "the new, fresh brutality of Muslim terrorists that the world have never, ever, ever witnessed !" !!

Hey..did you see how drug cartels in Mexico execute their victims? it's not beheading only, it also extends to hacking, smashing faces, skinning victims alive, blunt smashing with baseball bats, and it's all recorded, I will not quote links because I'm not stupid enough to get banned.

But that's that. Ignorance is knowledge in this world. Be ignorant, let others do the thinking for you, and you will rule. 
Let others do the thinking for you. Like a sheep, walk the streets saying: "Baaa Baaaa"... Believe the first thing you ever see. That is called "normal life".

White people are so so civilized ! they never -ever- carry on terrorism!
When a white person burns people from a UAV (Drone), it's so civilizied, liberal, democratic  !
But when brown people burn with IEDs (Improved Explisive devices), they are terrorist savages who should be nuked ! NUKE THEM !!

A white person shoots 30 people inside the movies ? it's okay, poor him is crazy, sick..
A brown Muslim shoots 30 people inside a bar? NUKE THE MUSLIM WORLD ! BROWN MONKEYS !!!!

Something bad is coming to this hypocrite world. I'm not defending Muslims, believe me. Arabs, Muslims, aren't angles. See Syria. But the rest of the world is not a paradise.

Keeping your head in the sand and injecting your butt with mainstream-media drugs is just a substitution of headaches; instead of a real headache, you get another one that is evolved around the Kardashians, Paris Hilton, who wants to be a Tranny and when. 

Until the fall comes.
And you just find out, that every penny you could use to escape was robbed by a fat cat (probably the same guy who fooled you via mainstream media and owned it) while you were enjoying one lovely meal of dirt with the worms.

Y'all-Quieda strikes again

(June 23, 2016 at 5:10 pm)The Valkyrie Wrote: White Christians are NEVER terrorists, don't you know that by now?

Pretty sure everybody called Tim McVey a terrorist.

(June 24, 2016 at 11:24 pm)AtlasS33 Wrote: It's too simple?

So many of humans (not just Americans) are chose the mainstream media to do the thinking for them. Left is where the mainstream media says so; right is where the mainstream media points at. 

For years, the Mexican drug cartels were carrying on "signature executions" with the method of beheading; the executions hit rival gangs, civilians and women too. But it never got media coverage. Mainstream media never gave that any covering, you never hear about "Los Zetas", you also never hear about "The gulf cartels"; but you always (and always) hear about a Muslim flip-flop wearing, skinny Muslim in the Afghani mountains, or a Muslim faggot who is -ironically- an Afghani also, always in locations which the United States own, invaded, or simply present on.

Beheading wasn't a shock for years, it never gets any coverage except in Hollywood drug movies, but out of a suddin, Liberals (Americans and  non Americans), are crying like whores over "the new, fresh brutality of Muslim terrorists that the world have never, ever, ever witnessed !" !!

Hey..did you see how drug cartels in Mexico execute their victims? it's not beheading only, it also extends to hacking, smashing faces, skinning victims alive, blunt smashing with baseball bats, and it's all recorded, I will not quote links because I'm not stupid enough to get banned.

But that's that. Ignorance is knowledge in this world. Be ignorant, let others do the thinking for you, and you will rule. 
Let others do the thinking for you. Like a sheep, walk the streets saying: "Baaa Baaaa"... Believe the first thing you ever see. That is called "normal life".

White people are so so civilized ! they never -ever- carry on terrorism!
When a white person burns people from a UAV (Drone), it's so civilizied, liberal, democratic  !
But when brown people burn with IEDs (Improved Explisive devices), they are terrorist savages who should be nuked ! NUKE THEM !!

A white person shoots 30 people inside the movies ? it's okay, poor him is crazy, sick..
A brown Muslim shoots 30 people inside a bar? NUKE THE MUSLIM WORLD ! BROWN MONKEYS !!!!

Something bad is coming to this hypocrite world. I'm not defending Muslims, believe me. Arabs, Muslims, aren't angles. See Syria. But the rest of the world is not a paradise.

Keeping your head in the sand and injecting your butt with mainstream-media drugs is just a substitution of headaches; instead of a real headache, you get another one that is evolved around the Kardashians, Paris Hilton, who wants to be a Tranny and when. 

Until the fall comes.
And you just find out, that every penny you could use to escape was robbed by a fat cat (probably the same guy who fooled you via mainstream media and owned it) while you were enjoying one lovely meal of dirt with the worms.

Was there a point somewhere in that rambling mess?