CInjin Cain Wrote:yeah, and John Wayne Gacy was a church deacon. The true person hides inside the heart.

Well the 'true person hiding inside the heart' here is a rather kind and mellow woman more likely to give you her food than she is to eat it.

(April 26, 2011 at 8:00 pm)Aerzia Saerules Arktuos Wrote:

CInjin Cain Wrote:yeah, and John Wayne Gacy was a church deacon. The true person hides inside the heart.

Well the 'true person hiding inside the heart' here is a rather kind and mellow woman more likely to give you her food than she is to eat it.

Unless of course theres no more food around to be had and than (by your own admission) you'd sooner kill that person and steal someone else's food to stay alive.

... and that is what I mean by, the true person within.

Cinjin Wrote:Unless of course theres no more food around to be had and than (by your own admission) you'd sooner kill that person and steal someone else's food to stay alive.

Correct. I will eat, but I will postpone my eating. I will not not eat though.

Quote:... and that is what I mean by, the true person within.

You mean the person that you will never see since they exist only in extremes that will never occur?

(April 26, 2011 at 8:07 pm)Aerzia Saerules Arktuos Wrote:

Cinjin Wrote:Unless of course theres no more food around to be had and than (by your own admission) you'd sooner kill that person and steal someone else's food to stay alive.

Correct. I will eat, but I will postpone my eating. I will not not eat though.

Quote:... and that is what I mean by, the true person within.

You mean the person that you will never see since they exist only in extremes that will never occur?

We've already seen that person, just not in her entirety.

Cinjin Cain Wrote:We've already seen that person, just not in her entirety.

Where now? Oh, did my honesty make you feel bad? Despite what some of these people may think they would do in the situation noted in the first hypothetical example... most of them would push that man. It is because they would be different people after years in the gutter

So while they are correct that they would not do so if they were in a position to do so... this question does not concern them but a future form of them that is changed. I'm just more honest about what the future me would do in that situation

(This is a tongue in cheek insult guys, i don't really mean it).

(April 26, 2011 at 8:10 pm)Cinjin Cain Wrote: We've already seen that person, just not in her entirety.

I vote we demand Aerzia show herself to us in her entirety. I am willing to give it at least a look.

(April 26, 2011 at 8:38 pm)Chuck Wrote:

(April 26, 2011 at 8:10 pm)Cinjin Cain Wrote: We've already seen that person, just not in her entirety.

I vote we demand Aerzia show herself to us in her entirety. I am willing to give it at least a look.

She accepts your demands without voting... three years from now. Not today though

Did you miss the clothing threads while people were still posting interesting threads, Chuck?

Aerzia Saerules Arktuos Wrote:You mean the person that you will never see since they exist only in extremes that will never occur?

How can you be so sure.

Actually, I think it would be quite interesting to see you without a computer or games for a while.

Ib.me.ub Wrote:How can you be so sure.

Actually, I think it would be quite interesting to see you without a computer or games for a while.

Easily... but certainty does not imply correctness

I'm the same person with or without the computer. More bored without it though, as the games still left to play are largely board games or ones in the imagination.

So you admit you could be wrong. Excellent.