And things are going further insane;

there was a serious discussion on POTUS or Patriot (Sirius/XM) tonite on POEs working in the Trump campaign that are engineering for his defeat and Hillary's win.

Additionally Levin is either paranoid or brilliant, he's convinced there will be a rule fight at the start of the RNC Convention to allow (or disallow, Levin is hard to follow sometimes) Trump's delegates to bolt. There is further weirdness in certain 'pubs not being allowed to address the convention since they won't endorse Trump and other 'pubs not supporting Trump being asked to address the convention.

Hell if I know what to make of all this crapulence . . . .

(July 8, 2016 at 12:38 am)Losty Wrote: I hope he doesn't. I feel like...I get too emotionally involved in this stuff.

Politics is "meh" to me. I do not become involved even though I realize I should care as equally about it as religion.

However, I become too emotionally involved with religion.

Good to know the State Department is re-opening the investigation. Hilary isn't out of the woods yet. If I was in Bernie's position right now I wouldn't endorse Hilary. The DNC is doing whatever it can to help Donald get elected anyway.

I got a lot of abuse for pointing out that Hilary is incompetent, so it's been good to know the FBI agreed with my assessment of Hilary. Will people dispute the FBI findings I wonder? The outcome was the worst outcome for the Clinton Campaign short of indictments being recommended.

(July 8, 2016 at 2:20 am)MrNoMorePropaganda Wrote: Good to know the State Department is re-opening the investigation.

Link?

(July 8, 2016 at 2:21 am)Maelstrom Wrote:

(July 8, 2016 at 2:20 am)MrNoMorePropaganda Wrote: Good to know the State Department is re-opening the investigation.

Link?

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/election-us-2016-36742095

(July 8, 2016 at 2:25 am)Bella Morte Wrote: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/election-us-2016-36742095

She didn't pay them enough?

(July 8, 2016 at 2:26 am)Maelstrom Wrote:

(July 8, 2016 at 2:25 am)Bella Morte Wrote: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/election-us-2016-36742095

She didn't pay them enough?

Thoughtt of this, don't know if it's exculpatory for Comey, but it might have been my take had I been in his shoes;


he was faced with possibly being a solitary individual with the power to (possibly) veto a president, something someone who believes strongly in democracy might be loathe to do.

Hence his use of accurate synonyms to describe Hillary's actions, but since they are synonyms, he has an 'out' for reaching his conclusion, but nevertheless, they are accurate synonyms for the precise wording that would have resulted in an opposite recommend from him.

He's put it in the voters laps, we have all we need to either vote our conscience or vote our politics.


I'd hope perhaps if I realized beforehand it's up to me to select, on behalf of everyone else, 2 profoundly different timelines, I might 'punt' too, let the people decide, fuck my oath, this is where I draw the line.

What now, though? My conscious and my politics both tell me that we cannot allow a Trump presidency. Hillary shouldn't even be the nominee. If you break the law on purpose and put the security of the entire nation at risk but you might not be sophisticated enough to know that that is illegal, you shouldn't even be allowed to run for president.

True, the thing is with Trump is he's even more of a danger because he can be a corrupt bastard without getting caught.

I agree Hilary is very unfit for present. Trump however is very very very very unfit for president

Very disgusting metaphor:

If you have a choice between two bowls of shit, choose the one that smells better.