(July 20, 2016 at 10:50 am)purplepurpose Wrote:

(July 20, 2016 at 10:31 am)FatAndFaithless Wrote: What the hell? Where did that come from?  What do you think she thinks about it?

If you start prasing and promoting few first steps of pervertness. Why not go all the way?

I think you mean "perverseness."  What's perverse about two dudes lovin' on each other?  Is anal sex between a man and woman perverse? What about oral sex? How do you define 'perverse'?

Besides, the rule that most (i'd wager all) of the folks here abide by is that as long as it's between consenting adults, then it's okay.

I trust you'll notice how your 'kids and animals' don't fit into "consenting adults."

Yeah, a consenting adult is okay. But I prefer when they beg for it.

(July 20, 2016 at 10:52 am)FatAndFaithless Wrote:

(July 20, 2016 at 10:50 am)purplepurpose Wrote: If you start prasing and promoting few first steps of pervertness. Why not go all the way?

I think you mean "perverseness."  What's perverse about two dudes lovin' on each other?  Is anal sex between a man and woman perverse?  What about oral sex?  How do you define 'perverse'?

Besides, the rule that most (i'd wager all) of the folks here abide by is that as long as it's between consenting adults, then it's okay.

I trust you'll notice how your 'kids and animals' don't fit into "consenting adults."

Years ago, there were moral norms, which were much more strict. If we all love eqality and freedom, why not soften up morale a bit more and promote animal and human couples atleast. We slaughter for meat, happy marriage for animals would be paradise compared to the slaughterhouse.

(July 20, 2016 at 10:59 am)purplepurpose Wrote:

(July 20, 2016 at 10:52 am)FatAndFaithless Wrote: I think you mean "perverseness."  What's perverse about two dudes lovin' on each other?  Is anal sex between a man and woman perverse?  What about oral sex?  How do you define 'perverse'?

Besides, the rule that most (i'd wager all) of the folks here abide by is that as long as it's between consenting adults, then it's okay.

I trust you'll notice how your 'kids and animals' don't fit into "consenting adults."

Years ago, there were moral norms, which were much more strict. If we all love eqality and freedom, why not soften up morale a bit more and promote animal and human couples atleast. We slaughter for meat, happy marriage for animals would be paradise compared to the slaughterhouse.

"Look at what a special little snowflake I am with my slippery slope fallacies!"

(July 20, 2016 at 10:59 am)purplepurpose Wrote: Years ago, there were moral norms, which were much more strict. If we all love eqality and freedom, why not soften up morale a bit more and promote animal and human couples atleast. [...]

Are you asking for permission? It's your dog, if you want to f*ck it - f*ck it. We don't need to know about it, weirdo. Sheeesh...

Dog ?

Goats were specified specifically.

(July 20, 2016 at 10:59 am)purplepurpose Wrote:

(July 20, 2016 at 10:52 am)FatAndFaithless Wrote: I think you mean "perverseness."  What's perverse about two dudes lovin' on each other?  Is anal sex between a man and woman perverse?  What about oral sex?  How do you define 'perverse'?

Besides, the rule that most (i'd wager all) of the folks here abide by is that as long as it's between consenting adults, then it's okay.

I trust you'll notice how your 'kids and animals' don't fit into "consenting adults."

Years ago, there were moral norms, which were much more strict. If we all love eqality and freedom, why not soften up morale a bit more and promote animal and human couples atleast. We slaughter for meat, happy marriage for animals would be paradise compared to the slaughterhouse.

"Consenting adults," purple. Those two words aren't too hard to understand.

And you've yet to provide a definition of perverse - which is odd because you're the one who used that word first.

(July 20, 2016 at 11:26 am)FatAndFaithless Wrote:

(July 20, 2016 at 10:59 am)purplepurpose Wrote: Years ago, there were moral norms, which were much more strict. If we all love eqality and freedom, why not soften up morale a bit more and promote animal and human couples atleast. We slaughter for meat, happy marriage for animals would be paradise compared to the slaughterhouse.

"Consenting adults," purple.  Those two words aren't too hard to understand.

And you've yet to provide a definition of perverse - which is odd because you're the one who used that word first.

Sexual needs become more and more dirty to get satisfaction. And even "consenting adults wall" eventially will be taken down.

(July 20, 2016 at 11:38 am)purplepurpose Wrote:

(July 20, 2016 at 11:26 am)FatAndFaithless Wrote: "Consenting adults," purple.  Those two words aren't too hard to understand.

And you've yet to provide a definition of perverse - which is odd because you're the one who used that word first.

Sexual needs become more and more dirty to get satisfaction. And even "consenting adults wall" eventially will be taken down.

You're trying so hard to not define perverse.  How about defining 'dirty'?

And are you seriously under the impression that homosexuals didn't exist 2000 years ago?  There's nothing 'new' about them.

(July 20, 2016 at 11:40 am)FatAndFaithless Wrote:

(July 20, 2016 at 11:38 am)purplepurpose Wrote: Sexual needs become more and more dirty to get satisfaction. And even "consenting adults wall" eventially will be taken down.

You're trying so hard to not define perverse.  How about defining 'dirty'?

And are you seriously under the impression that homosexuals didn't exist 2000 years ago?  There's nothing 'new' about them.

Sex with animals has the same ancient history, but less intense. Dirty - immoral. But societies moral tastes are constantly changing.