Well, the question was, "Who's afraid of terrorism?" I'd say experience is relevant. After all, that's not a question susceptible to judgement bias.

I am not afraid of terrorism.

It mainly seems to be a Middle Eastern situation that has aspirations of spreading its terror further when it clearly does not have the power to do so.

(July 24, 2016 at 12:18 am)Maelstrom Wrote: I am not afraid of terrorism.  

It mainly seems to be a Middle Eastern situation that has aspirations of spreading its terror further when it clearly does not have the power to do so.

Well, it clearly does..

(July 24, 2016 at 12:28 am)Bella Morte Wrote: Well, it clearly does..

Tomayto, tomahto.

Tell that to the 80 dead and 180 injured from Nice!

I'm sure they weren't terrorised! Maybe mildly inconvenienced by a semi driving over them?

(July 24, 2016 at 12:33 am)Maelstrom Wrote:

(July 24, 2016 at 12:28 am)Bella Morte Wrote: Well, it clearly does..

Tomayto, tomahto.

Sometimes you really do talk utter shite. To say that terrorists don't have the power to spread their terror further is fucking ridiculous and quite frankly insulting to those who have died.

(July 24, 2016 at 3:39 am)ignoramus Wrote: I'm sure they weren't terrorised! Maybe mildly inconvenienced by a semi driving over them?

You know, there's a difference between being in a horrible situation and fearing it to happen on an abstract level. If I did, I probably wouldn't leave my house anymore. Truth is, I don't reflect on what could happen. If it happens, I have to deal with it then. But I wouldn't be better prepared if my mind was constantly fixated on all the things that could possibly endanger my life.

Reminds me of the old duck and cover bullshit, the US government spewed back in the 50ies. Wouldn't have saved a single life and only contributed to the mass hysteria of being in immanent danger of being nuked.

I know, I know ... It's a play on the word "terror".
Truthfully, in it's correct definition, yes, I am worried about an imminent terrorist attack in Australia soon.
I'm not worried that I personally will be hurt, and it doesn't change the way I live my life.
It just worries me more in a philosophical sense as in "what the fuck is happening to the world".

(July 24, 2016 at 4:27 am)ignoramus Wrote: I know, I know ... It's a play on the word "terror".
Truthfully, in it's correct definition, yes, I am worried about an imminent terrorist attack in Australia soon.
I'm not worried that I personally will be hurt, and it doesn't change the way I live my life.
It just worries me more in a philosophical sense as in "what the fuck is happening to the world".

Not to downplay the importance of Australia, but on the terror map it's probably the least important country. Only second to Micronesia.

France is a natural target because they're at the forefront of flying airstrikes against ISIS. Belgium is a symbolic target with NATO and the EU having their headquarters there. Turkey, of course. The other European countries, not so much, since they aren't as involved. Britain got attacked in 2005, but that was still Al Quaeda or affiliates, Spain in 2004, if memory serves. That was in response to Iraq and Afghanistan.

Could it happen anywhere? Of course. But, as I said, if I go about fearing imminent attacks, the only thing I stand to gain is a first class neurosis. But would I be safer? Not in the least. And, as I repeatedly said. I grew up with terror. One attack I lived through, as I said and many, many others happened in my vicinity. Munich '72, all the terrorist acts of the 70ies in Germany and Austria, the bombing of the October fest in 1980, the bombing at Bologna, and so on, and so on.

Agree... Our govt is rethinking the way they manage large public gatherings in light of Nice.
I suppose if you make it hard for them to have easy big kills, they'll go elsewhere.